HAP 412 Information Systems Case One ✓ Solved

HAP 412 Information Systems Case One Hap 412 Information Systems Cas

HAP 412 Information Systems Case One Hap 412 Information Systems Cas

HAP 412 Information Systems Case One. HAP 412 Information Systems Case One. No due date Spring : Information Systems Case One In this assignment you will select a health information system topic from the list below: 1 Implementation of an EMR. 2 Using voice recognition 3 Decision support tools 4 E-pharmacy 5 Telehealth 6 Hospital patient information interoperability 7 Population health data collection 8 Mobile device usage 9 Integration of external physicians 10 Interoperability of an Accountable Care Organization 11 Other: You decide—approval required. Select the topic and determine what you want to explore and discuss.

You determine the topic. Write your paper from an investigation of the topic and consider problems or issues associated with the topic. You need to select a PROBLEM to explore and create a clear problem statement. Example: Physician acceptance of an EMR is hindered by inadequate training. Then set out to define and provide backing to your statement of the issue.

You will support your statement of a problem. Content: Complete an abstract of the HIS issue that provides a brief description of the issue, a brief synopsis of the information you uncovered and an explanation of the solution/objectives you want to project. Provide a thorough review of your paper. Body of paper: 1 Background information of the topic/issue. Provide details of the topic.

Describe the core aspects of the topic and any applicable points that you need to explain. Provide any pertinent information to explain what you need to regarding our understanding of the topic. 2 Description of problem: Identify the major problems. Provide some detail of the causes and effects of the problem. Identify and link the symptoms and root causes of the problems. Differentiate short term from long term problems. 3 Analysis of problem: Provide a detailed analysis of the problems identified in the Statement of the Problem. In the analysis, apply theories and models from the text and/or readings. Support conclusions and/or assumptions with specific references to the case and/or the readings 4 Decision Criteria and Alternative Solutions: Identify criteria against which you evaluate alternative solutions (i.e. time for implementation, tangible costs, acceptability to management). Include two or three possible alternative solutions. Evaluate the pros and cons of each alternative against the criteria listed. E.. Recommended Solution, Implementation and Justification: Identify who, what, when, and how in your recommended plan of action that addresses the problem. Writing Expectations: Provide at least four external sources (in addition to your textbook) should be referenced to back up your recommendations or to identify issues. This information would be ideally sourced in current journals, magazines and newspapers and should reflect current management thought or practice with respect to the issues identified. Paper needs to have a clear introduction (purpose and preview, body and conclusion). College level writing expected. Your case analysis should: • Include the five sections listed above and include the abstract • Be double spaced and the pages should be numbered • Have 1inch margins – top bottom left and right • Use 12 point font size • Be free of spelling errors • Use an established referencing system 5-7 pages. Contact me at any time on this case. If you have any questions about a topic or sub-topic, please let me know.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The integration of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) into healthcare settings has revolutionized patient data management, offering improved efficiency and patient outcomes. However, despite their advantages, many healthcare institutions face significant challenges in implementation, often due to resistance from clinicians, lack of training, and interoperability issues. This paper explores the problem of physician acceptance of EMRs hindered by inadequate training and proposes solutions to improve adoption rates.

Background

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) are digital versions of paper charts used in medical practices to store patient information. They facilitate quick access to patient histories, improve accuracy, and support decision-making. The core aspects include data entry, storage, retrieval, and sharing among healthcare providers. Despite the widespread recognition of their benefits, many physicians are reluctant to fully utilize EMRs due to factors such as usability concerns, workflow disruptions, and insufficient training (Koppel & Kreda, 2014).

Problem Description

The primary problem identified is physician resistance to adopting EMRs, primarily caused by inadequate training and support. This resistance leads to underutilization of EM features, data entry errors, and ultimately, compromised patient care. Short-term effects include decreased productivity and increased frustration, while long-term issues involve reduced quality of care, financial losses, and technological obsolescence (Wright & Sittig, 2015).

Analysis

Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), resistance is linked to perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Lack of effective training diminishes perceived ease, leading to reluctance (Davis, 1989). Furthermore, The Diffusion of Innovations theory emphasizes the importance of proper training and support in facilitating technology adoption (Rogers, 2003). Studies indicate that targeted training programs and ongoing support significantly improve acceptance rates (Berg et al., 2012).

Decision Criteria and Alternatives

Evaluation criteria include implementation cost, time, user acceptance, and impact on workflow. Alternatives include: (1) intensive hands-on training sessions, (2) peer mentoring programs, and (3) incorporating usability improvements through user-centered design. The first option offers immediate results but has higher costs; the second promotes peer support but requires time; the third involves software customization to enhance usability.

Recommended Solution and Implementation

The preferred solution is to implement a comprehensive training program combined with ongoing support and mentorship. This involves scheduling regular workshops, creating a helpdesk, and establishing peer mentor roles. The implementation should begin within three months, targeting all physicians, with evaluation through feedback surveys and usage metrics. Leadership should allocate resources and assign responsibilities to ensure successful adoption (Adler-Milstein et al., 2017).

Conclusion

Addressing physician training barriers is critical for the successful implementation of EMRs. By investing in tailored training and support, healthcare organizations can enhance user acceptance, improve data quality, and bolster patient outcomes. Future research should focus on innovative training methods, including simulation and virtual support environments, to further facilitate adoption.

References

• Adler-Milstein, J., DesRoches, C. M., & Jha, A. K. (2017). Health information technology in U.S. hospitals: Progress and challenges. Health Affairs, 36(5), 859-866.
• Berg, M., Pluye, P., & Loignon, C. (2012). Understanding resistance to electronic health records in health care organizations. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 81(2), 161–170.
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
• Koppel, R., & Kreda, D. (2014). Medical but confusing: The layout and usability of electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(2), 353–359.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
• Wright, A., & Sittig, D. F. (2015). A framework and taxonomy of electronic health record functionality. Implementation Science, 10(1), 11.