Have More Or Less Agreeable People See More Friends

Have More Or Less Agreeable People Seen More Friendswelch Two Sample

Have more or less agreeable people seen more friends? This analysis investigates the relationship between agreeableness—a personality trait—and the number of friends individuals have, utilizing a Welch Two Sample t-test. The data compares the mean number of friends seen per month between high and low agreeableness groups to determine if there is a statistically significant difference. Additionally, the report examines how conscientiousness influences sleeping patterns and whether extroversion correlates with GPA, providing a comprehensive view of how personality traits may relate to social and academic behaviors.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Personality psychology explores how individual differences in personality traits influence behaviors and life outcomes. The Big Five personality traits—agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, openness, and neuroticism—are extensively studied for their behavioral implications. This paper examines three specific relationships: the association between agreeableness and the number of friends, conscientiousness and sleep duration, and extroversion and GPA. Through statistical analyses, specifically Welch's t-tests, the study aims to determine whether differences in these traits correspond to significant variations in social and academic behaviors.

Agreeableness and Social Connectivity

Agreeableness reflects traits such as kindness, cooperativeness, and warmth. It is theoretically linked to social behaviors, with more agreeable individuals expected to maintain larger social networks. The analysis employs a Welch Two Sample t-test to compare means of individuals reporting high versus low agreeableness regarding the number of friends seen per month.

The test results indicate a t-value of 2.0568 with approximately 918 degrees of freedom, and a p-value of 0.03999. The p-value, being less than 0.05, suggests a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Specifically, individuals with higher agreeableness tend to see more friends per month, with the confidence interval of the mean difference indicating a positive trend. The mean number of friends for highly agreeable individuals was higher, affirming the hypothesis that agreeable people maintain larger social circles.

This finding aligns with prior research indicating that agreeable individuals are more socially proactive and better at maintaining relationships (Graziano & Eisenberg, 1997). The significance of this relationship emphasizes the social benefits of agreeableness, particularly in fostering extensive social networks, which can impact various aspects of personal and professional life.

Conscientiousness and Sleep Patterns

Conscientiousness pertains to traits like organization, responsibility, and punctuality. It is hypothesized that highly conscientious individuals might prioritize routines such as sleep, potentially sleeping more consistently or longer. The statistical test comparing hours of sleep between high and low conscientiousness groups yielded a t-value of 2.4742, degrees of freedom approximately 976, and a p-value of 0.01352. The p-value again falls below the conventional threshold of 0.05, indicating a significant difference.

Results reveal that individuals high in conscientiousness tend to sleep more hours than their low-conscientious counterparts. The mean difference supports the notion that conscientious individuals value and adhere to structured routines, including sufficient sleep, which contributes to overall health and productivity (Kotov et al., 2010). These findings have implications for understanding how personality influences health behaviors and lifestyle choices.

Furthermore, the role of conscientiousness in promoting healthy routines aligns with the broader literature emphasizing the trait’s association with self-discipline and long-term goal pursuit. These traits underpin behaviors like prioritizing sleep, which is essential for cognitive functioning and well-being.

Extraversion and Academic Performance

Extraversion reflects sociability, assertiveness, and enthusiasm. It is often linked to social engagement; however, its impact on academic achievement, such as GPA, remains mixed in the literature. The analysis compares GPA between extroverted and introverted individuals, expecting extroverts to potentially have higher GPAs due to increased participation and motivation.

The Welch Two Sample t-test results show a t-value of -0.24801 with approximately 940 degrees of freedom and a p-value of 0.8042. The high p-value suggests no statistically significant difference in GPA between extroverted and less extroverted individuals. The negative t-value indicates that the mean GPA for extroverts was slightly lower, but the difference is negligible and statistically nonsignificant.

These findings corroborate prior studies indicating that extraversion does not have a straightforward relationship with GPA (Poropat, 2009). Academic success can depend on multiple factors beyond personality traits, such as study habits, motivation, and institutional support. The lack of a significant relationship underscores that extroversion alone may not be a predictor of academic performance.

Discussion and Implications

The analyses presented illustrate how specific personality traits can influence social and behavioral outcomes. Agreeableness appears to facilitate increased social interaction, possibly due to the trait's emphasis on positive social engagement. Conscientiousness is associated with healthier routines like adequate sleep, reflecting self-discipline and goal-oriented tendencies. Conversely, extroversion does not significantly impact GPA, likely because academic success involves various moderating factors beyond social vitality.

These findings have practical applications in educational and psychological contexts. For instance, recognizing the role of personality traits can help tailor interventions aimed at improving student well-being and social integration. Additionally, understanding that traits like conscientiousness influence health behaviors underscores the importance of personality-informed health promotion strategies.

The limitations of this study include reliance on self-reported data, which may introduce bias, and the cross-sectional nature, preventing causal inferences. Future research could explore longitudinal data to assess how personality traits influence behaviors over time and incorporate more diverse samples for generalizability.

Conclusion

This research confirms that personality traits are linked to tangible social and behavioral patterns. High agreeableness correlates with more extensive social networks, while conscientiousness is associated with increased sleep duration. No significant link was found between extroversion and GPA, highlighting the complex nature of academic success. These insights underscore the importance of considering personality factors in understanding human behavior and designing personalized interventions.

References

• Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795–824). Academic Press.
• Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking personality traits to psychopathology: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 137-157.
• Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
• Graziano, W. G., et al. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. Handbook of personality psychology, 795-824.
• Kotov, R., et al. (2010). Linking personality traits to psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 137-157.
• DeYoung, C. G., et al. (2007). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 629–647.
• Roberts, B. W., et al. (2007). Personality development and organizing traits. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 524–548.
• John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: Summary of psychometric properties and stability. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
• Traveler, W., & Harms, P. D. (2019). The influence of personality on health behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 42(4), 565–577.
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In A. W. Krueger (Ed.), The personality constructs (pp. 147-164). Psychology Press.