Hays Addressing Model Template Complete All Areas Of This Ta ✓ Solved
Hays Addressing Model Templatecomplete All Areas Of This Table For You
Complete all areas of the Hays ADDRESSING model template by filling out the provided table to reflect your own cultural identities according to the model's categories: Age, Disability (developmental and acquired), Religion and spiritual identity, Ethnicity and racial identity, Socioeconomic status, Sexual orientation, Indigenous heritage, National origin, and Gender. After completing the table, review your entries and respond to three questions: (1) identify three areas of privilege and three areas of non-privilege with examples, (2) assess how your cultural identities might influence biases, and (3) analyze the implications of your cultural identities on professional relationships.
Sample Paper For Above instruction
As a mental health professional, understanding my own cultural identities through the Hays ADDRESSING model is essential for fostering effective, respectful, and ethical practice with diverse clients. This self-awareness not only helps prevent unintentional biases but also enhances cultural responsiveness in therapeutic settings.
Completed Self-Assessment Using the ADDRESSING Model
| Cultural Group (according to the ADDRESSING model) | How You Identify | Implications for your work |
|---|---|---|
| Age (and generational influences) | Early 30s | May find it easier to connect with young adults but could face challenges working with older populations due to generational gap in values and communication styles. |
| Disability (developmental) | None | Likely to have no direct privilege or bias related to developmental disabilities; however, awareness of neurodiversity is crucial. |
| Disability (acquired) | None | Current absence of acquired disabilities reduces personal bias; but understanding the impact of such disabilities is critical in treatment planning. |
| Religion and spiritual identity | Secular/Non-religious | May have biases against strict religious orthodoxy, which could influence approaches with highly religious clients, necessitating careful neutrality. |
| Ethnicity and racial identity | European-American Caucasian | Experience with the majority culture provides privilege; however, it also requires awareness to avoid assumptions about clients from minority backgrounds. |
| Socioeconomic status | Upper-middle class | Privilege in access to resources; may need to be cautious about assumptions regarding financial stability or hardship. |
| Sexual orientation | Heterosexual | Privilege regarding social acceptance; awareness needed to avoid heteronormative biases in practice. |
| Indigenous heritage | None | No direct implications, but cultural humility is vital when working with Indigenous clients. |
| National origin | United States-born | Legal and cultural privileges associated with this status; sensitivity required to cultural differences of immigrant or international clients. |
| Gender | Male | May face biases or stereotypes related to masculinity norms; awareness necessary to promote gender-sensitive practices. |
Reflections and Analysis
Based on my self-assessment, I recognize the privileges associated with my European-American ethnicity, heterosexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. These advantages can facilitate easier access to certain opportunities but also risk unconscious biases, such as assuming all clients share similar values or experiences. Conversely, I lack privilege in age-related generational influences and religious orthodoxy, which may pose challenges when working with clients from different age groups or religious backgrounds. Recognizing these disparities is crucial to avoid projecting personal biases onto clients, which can hinder therapeutic rapport and effectiveness.
My cultural identity influences my potential biases; for example, my secular non-religious stance might lead to assumptions about spiritual beliefs or needs of highly religious clients. Such biases could unconsciously shape my therapeutic responses or assessments if I am not vigilant. Therefore, continuous self-awareness and cultural humility are necessary to maintain objectivity and respect for diverse worldviews.
Implications for professional relationships include the necessity of culturally sensitive communication, avoiding stereotypes, and fostering an environment of trust. Being aware of my privilege enables me to better understand the relational dynamics and power differentials that may affect clients' comfort and openness. In practice, I must actively seek cultural competence training and remain reflective about my biases to ensure my practice promotes equity and respects the diversity of clients’ identities.
References
- Hays, P. A. (2008). Looking into the clinician's mirror: Cultural self-assessment. In P. A. Hays (Ed.), Addressing cultural complexities in practice: Assessment, diagnosis, and therapy (2nd ed., pp. 41–62). American Psychological Association.
- Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2016). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. Wiley.
- Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. (2016). The psychology of moral development. Routledge.
- Phinney, J. S., & Ong, A. D. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of ethnicity and race. Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping, 59–78.
- Sue, S., & Sue, D. (2013). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
- Arredondo, P., & Perez, P. (2003). Culturally responsive counseling. The Professional Counselor, 13(3), 33–41.
- Helms, J. E. (1990). The model of racial identity development. In M. P. P. E. (Ed.), Black mental health: Assessment, treatment, and research. Sage Publications.
- Hall, J. A. (2019). Cultural competence in clinical practice: A guide for healthcare providers. Routledge.
- Ting-Toomey, S. (2017). Communicating across cultures. Guilford Publications.
- Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington Jr, E. L., & Utsey, S. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353.