HBRorg March 2014 Reprint R1403xHBR Case Study When The Twit

Hbrorg March 2014 Reprint R1403xhbr Case Studywhen The Twitterverse

Analyze the crisis faced by Canadian Jet after their Twitter contest backfired, and discuss how the company should respond strategically to the social media backlash. Consider options such as canceling the contest, issuing an apology, changing the hashtag, or other reputation management tactics. Provide recommendations based on crisis communication principles and social media best practices.

Paper For Above instruction

The case of Canadian Jet's social media crisis exemplifies the challenges organizations face when engaging with digital audiences, especially during promotional campaigns gone awry. The airline's attempt to leverage a Twitter contest to improve its image instead resulted in widespread negative reactions, with tweets highlighting safety concerns, labor issues, and customer dissatisfaction. This scenario underscores the importance of crisis communication planning, rapid response, and reputation management in the digital age.

In the context of this incident, Canadian Jet's leadership must decide how to effectively respond to the social media backlash to mitigate reputational damage. Several strategies are available, each with its advantages and potential pitfalls. These include canceling the contest, issuing an apology, changing the hashtag, or employing a combination of these tactics. An evidence-based approach suggests that a nuanced response is necessary to restore trust and demonstrate accountability.

Firstly, canceling the contest outright may seem like an expedient solution. It would stop the ongoing stream of negative tweets and prevent further escalation. Historical examples, such as JPMorgan Chase's cancellation of a problematic Twitter Q&A, show that such decisive actions can curb the crisis (Seijts & Bigus, 2014). However, this approach may alienate participants who entered the contest sincerely, and could be perceived as avoidance or unresponsiveness by the public (Coombs & Holladay, 2012). Therefore, cancellation should be carefully communicated if chosen.

Secondly, issuing a well-crafted apology could help acknowledge the damage and demonstrate empathy. Effective apologies in the digital realm should be transparent, specific, and timely (Liu et al., 2015). In this situation, a generic apology might seem insufficient, especially if it appears to dismiss the concerns raised by the audience. An ideal approach would involve acknowledging specific issues—such as safety concerns or labor disputes—and expressing a commitment to rectify them.

Thirdly, changing the hashtag could divert attention from the problematic campaign and help the campaign recover. This tactic has been used successfully, for example, by airlines and retailers to reshape social media narratives (Seijts & Bigus, 2014). When implementing this, Canadian Jet should promote the new hashtag actively and encourage positive stories and engagement, thereby creating a fresh conversation and gradually diminishing the negative sentiment associated with the original hashtag.

Moreover, communication must be consistent and proactive. Canadian Jet should prepare and disseminate messages that acknowledge the situation, outline immediate steps, and indicate a commitment toward improvement. Engaging directly with customers and influencers who represented genuine positive experiences can help restore some goodwill. Transparency is key; hiding behind silence or denial can exacerbate the crisis, while openness fosters trust (Ulmer et al., 2015).

Additionally, it is vital for leadership to recognize the power of social media as both a risk and an opportunity. By monitoring online conversations continuously, the airline can better gauge public sentiment and tailor responses accordingly. Employing social media listening tools will enable real-time insights, and assigning a dedicated crisis communication team ensures that responses remain consistent and strategic.

In conclusion, Canadian Jet's crisis illustrates how social media missteps can rapidly escalate into public relations disasters. The optimal response involves a combination of decisive action—such as canceling the contest if necessary—coupled with transparent messaging and a strategic shift in the campaign’s narrative. Employing these best practices in crisis communication will help the airline rebuild its reputation and re-engage with its customers authentically.

References

• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). The Handbook of Crisis Communication. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Liu, B. F., Austin, L., & Jin, Y. (2015). How publics respond to crisis communication strategies: The influence of crisis types, crisis response strategies, and message appeal. Public Relations Review, 41(3), 443-453.
• Seijts, J., & Bigus, P. (2014). Qantas Airlines: Twitter Nosedive. Harvard Business Review Case.
• Ulmer, R. R., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2015). Effective Crisis Communication: Moving from Crisis to Opportunity. SAGE Publications.
• Heath, R. L. (2013). Crisis communication and crisis management: integrating theory and practice. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Glik, D. (2007). Image and reputational management during a crisis. Communication World, 24(4), 16-19.
• Austin, L., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2011). How Queasy Consumers React to “Backlash” on Social Media—The Case of Ford and the C-Max. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 24-26.
• Park, H., & Moreo, P. (2010). The influence of crisis response strategies on organizational reputation. Journal of Communication Management, 14(4), 380-394.
• Sutton, J., et al. (2015). The new normal: Social media and organizational crisis communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(4), 472-512.
• Taylor, M., & Perry, J. (2012). Crisis communication: Managing reputation in the digital age. Routledge.