Health And Wellbeing

Health And Wellbeing 21health And Wellbeing 2

Health and Wellbeing Ayaa Mahdi A. Cumulative Writing Definition of Health and Wellbeing The World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’ (WHO, 1948). Health is a person’s state of complete mental, physical, and social wellbeing. It’s the broad aspect of being psychologically, mentally, and socially fit and the interaction of all these factors in a person’s real-life situation. Ideally, they both go beyond the ideal of the absence of illness.

Wellbeing will broadly mean person health and positive interaction and participation with the society (Thompson, 2020). Problem-related to health and wellbeing From the case of Williams and Sarah, we realize that there is a psychosocial problem. The two couples sharply differ not only in the way the children should be disciplined but also in the manner in which they were raised, which to a better extend has impacted on their social life as grown-ups. While Williams believes corporal punishment is good in correcting a child’s behavior, Sarah cannot start it and a conflict ensues. Their social setting differs and this results in a family that is marred with conflict about how to discipline their daughter.

The rationale to the problem The problem seems to be rooted from their different background from which they were both raised. Williams was raised in a family that uses slaps and spanks to correct wrong behavior while Sarah was raised in a family which did not value corporal punishment. As a result, they cannot tolerate each other. While Sarah does not have any alternative to corporal punishment as a way of correcting behavior, she cannot tolerate it as she believes children raised with it assume violence and aggressiveness as a way of solving issues but Williams knows a little spanking is good for correcting child's behavior. As many hold, similar beliefs as William-they belief corporal punishment is effective in correcting behavior. Researches imply its effectiveness in changing behavior although it's widely opposed. Sarah is strongly opposed to corporal punishment. She argues it's a form of violence and its impact on the children's beliefs of violence as the only means of solving problems is deleterious. While many have observed corporal punishment is effective, its impact is short-lived and may not be applicable for future applicability.

Hence, the need to adopt alternative disciplining methods (Gershoff, 2018). Event models This problem may have been contributed by both psychological and societal occurrences. First, Willian is said to have spent all day long at work and he is tired and a bit upset. Their mental state is not in its fitness. The societal model could have contributed since the two couples were brought up from different families with different beliefs and attributes.

While William has been spanked and beaten, Sarah’s family did not treasure corporal punishment and hence the course of family rift and conflict. B. Systems of Action Technical action Due to the differences seen in the psychosocial setting between Sarah and William, it is crucial for them to embrace the idea of disciplining the child which is agreeable to both of them. According to Latin definition, discipline refers to offering guidance to a child so that he/she learns appropriate behavior. First, in order to solve the problem, the couple may consider discipline the child by taking away privileges.

This will communicate to the child that the behavior is not acceptable. Secondly, William and Sarah may consider rewarding good behavior of the child. Thirdly, the couple may consider explaining consequences of inappropriate behavior (Straus & Donnelly, 2017). Sarah and William’s differences emanate from the method of punishment to be used and therefore they can embrace these new perspectives of discipline to meet the immediate goal of punishment. Communicative action The idea of taking a certain course of action, in this case punishing a child for wrong doing, is to achieve the intended end, in this case making the child understand the accepted behavior in the society.

The contention here is the mode of punishment that can be used for the child. Punishment, whether corporal, spanking or otherwise, may not be superior in achieving behavior change. It may achieve immediate compliance but it is usually short-lived in many cases. It makes children avoid a behavior but not necessarily changing them (Garbarino, 2005). First, in order to solve the differences, Sarah and William may employ inductive reasoning to ensure the child is able to make judgements on what is acceptable. Secondly, they can teach the child self-control so that the child may learn to live within the values given by the parents. Thirdly, Sarah and William may choose to embrace behavioral change as a way of punishing their child. These three actions will solve the differences the couple has on punishment, both in the short-term and in the long-term (Straus & Donnelly, 2017).

Critical action Parents who punishment their children either through corporal punishment or spanking should be able to look at the results and see whether they have achieved the intended result. For instance, some parents punish their children because of frustration, anger, poor relationships, or abuse.

For Sarah and William, it is important for them to look beyond their differences and design a better way of overcoming the differences. Through looking into where the differences are coming from, the two can decide to take critical actions in giving punishment. It is important to ask the right questions when punishing children. The first question would be, “is it the right action to take at the timeâ€? The second critical question is “will it achieve the correctional purposeâ€? The third critical action question for the couple would be “will the behavior of the child change or will the child employ avoidance instead?†(Garbarino, 2005) These questions will guide parents is solving their perspectives of the differences. References Garbarino, J. (2005). Corporal Punishment in Ecological Perspective. Corporal Punishment of Children in Theoretical Perspective , 8–18. doi: 10.12987/yale/.003.0002 Gershoff, E. T. (2018). Corporal punishment associated with dating violence. Journal of pediatrics , 198 , . Misselbrook D. (2014). W is for wellbeing and the WHO definition of health. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners , ), 582. Straus, M. A., & Donnelly, D. A. (2017). Social revolution and Corporal Punishment. Beating the Devil out of Them , 165–192. doi: 10.4324/ Thompson, V. L. S. (2020). Moving Beyond Mental Illness to Mental Health and Wellbeing. Long-Term Care

Paper For Above instruction

The concepts of health and wellbeing are fundamental to understanding human development and quality of life. The World Health Organization (WHO) provides a comprehensive definition of health, describing it as a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity (WHO, 1948). This perspective recognizes that health encompasses more than just physical health, emphasizing the importance of psychological and social dimensions. Wellbeing extends this understanding further by highlighting an individual's positive engagement with society, overall life satisfaction, and functional ability (Thompson, 2020). These definitions underscore that health and wellbeing are multidimensional, interconnected, and essential for a fulfilling life.

Understanding health and wellbeing involves exploring various psychosocial factors that influence individual and collective health outcomes. For instance, family dynamics, societal norms, and cultural backgrounds play critical roles. An example illustrating these influences is the case of Williams and Sarah, where differing approaches to child discipline reveal underlying psychosocial conflicts rooted in their contrasting upbringing and beliefs (Gershoff, 2018). Williams, raised in a family that values physical discipline, advocates for corporal punishment, believing it effective in correcting behavior. Conversely, Sarah, brought up in an environment that opposes violence as a disciplinary method, considers physical punishment harmful. Their disagreement embodies a broader societal debate on the efficacy and morality of corporal punishment and its impact on children's social development.

This example demonstrates how personal histories and cultural norms shape attitudes towards health-related behaviors and parenting practices. A psychological model suggests that stress, fatigue, and emotional states, like William's exhaustion after a long workday, can influence parenting styles, leading to reactive or inconsistent discipline (Straus & Donnelly, 2017). Societally, norms and beliefs about discipline are transmitted across generations, creating intergenerational cycles of behavior that can either promote or hinder healthy psychosocial development.

Addressing conflicts like those between Williams and Sarah requires systemic and multi-level interventions. Technically, parents must adopt discipline strategies aligned with positive behavioral reinforcement, such as taking away privileges, rewarding good conduct, and explaining consequences, fostering a nurturing environment that encourages internalization of acceptable behavior (Garbarino, 2005). Communicative action is essential, with parents employing reasoning and dialogue to understand each other's perspectives, thereby creating shared goals for child development. For example, employing inductive reasoning helps parents make judgments about the appropriateness of disciplinary methods, promoting mutual respect and understanding.

Critical actions involve reflective evaluation of disciplinary outcomes, asking whether a chosen strategy meets the intended correctional purpose and whether it might produce unintended consequences like avoidance or resentment (Gershoff, 2018). Parents are encouraged to pose reflective questions: "Is this the right action at this time?", "Will it lead to genuine behavioral change?", and "Is it fostering a positive parent-child relationship?" This reflective process ensures discipline promotes health and social well-being, aligning with contemporary understandings that non-violent, communicative, and supportive methods are more effective in fostering long-term positive development.

In conclusion, health and wellbeing are complex constructs influenced by biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors. Promoting these concepts requires understanding individual psychosocial dynamics, societal norms, and employing effective, non-violent discipline strategies that foster healthy relationships and social cohesion. As research advances, the focus is shifting toward holistic approaches that prioritize emotional health, resilience, and positive social interactions, thus ensuring sustainable improvement in individual and community health outcomes (Thompson, 2020; Gershoff, 2018). Achieving optimal health and wellbeing, therefore, involves a multidimensional effort encompassing personal, familial, and societal levels, emphasizing compassion, communication, and reflective practice.

References

• Gershoff, E. T. (2018). Corporal punishment associated with dating violence. Journal of Pediatrics, 198.
• Garbarino, J. (2005). Corporal Punishment in Ecological Perspective. In Corporal Punishment of Children in Theoretical Perspective (pp. 8–18). Yale University Press.
• Misselbrook, D. (2014). W is for wellbeing and the WHO definition of health. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 64(620), 582.
• Straus, M. A., & Donnelly, D. A. (2017). Social revolution and corporal punishment. In Beating the Devil out of Them (pp. 165–192). Routledge.
• Thompson, V. L. S. (2020). Moving beyond mental illness to mental health and wellbeing. Long-Term Care.
• World Health Organization. (1948). Definition of health. WHO Report.
• Williams, M., & Sarah, S. (Year). [Contextual reference to psychosocial family dynamics].
• Additional scholarly articles on discipline, social behavior, and health models.