Healthcare Is A Fundamental Right Rooted In Ethics 374484

Healthcare Is A Fundamental Right Rooted In The Ethic

Healthcare is a fundamental right rooted in the ethical principle of justice: “The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition” (WHO, 2017). Viewing healthcare as a right ensures equitable access to necessary services for all individuals, regardless of socio-economic status. This perspective aligns with the deontological ethical framework, which emphasizes duties and principles over outcomes. From a deontological standpoint, the rights and needs of individuals must be prioritized to achieve moral obligations. This approach ensures that everyone has access to healthcare, addressing individual rights and needs while supporting public health systems by preventing widespread disease and promoting overall societal well-being.

Balancing individual rights with public health needs can be challenging, but it is essential to create a fair and just healthcare system (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019). Understanding individuals' rights and access to healthcare is crucial in health policy decisions. Policies must be designed to protect these rights and ensure equitable access, which can reduce health disparities and improve population health outcomes. When policymakers actively consider and apply ethical principles, they are better equipped to develop laws and regulations that serve the best interests of all stakeholders, thereby reinforcing the importance of these principles in shaping healthcare policies (Gostin, 2016). Using a deontological model impacts stakeholders' influence on health policy by emphasizing moral duties and rights.

This approach ensures that policies are evaluated based on their adherence to ethical standards, promoting fairness and justice in healthcare. Stakeholders, including patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers, are not just encouraged, but empowered to advocate for policies that uphold these ethical principles. This empowerment can lead to a more equitable healthcare system, underscoring the potential impact of their actions (Daniels, 2001).

Paper For Above instruction

Healthcare as a fundamental right is a concept deeply embedded in ethical philosophy and human rights frameworks. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2017) explicitly states that the highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental human right, emphasizing that access should not be determined by race, religion, political beliefs, or socio-economic status. This assertion reflects the ethical principle of justice, advocating for equitable access to healthcare services for all individuals regardless of their background or economic circumstances. It posits that health is not merely a privilege but an inherent entitlement, which demands that healthcare systems be designed to uphold these rights and eliminate disparities.

Deontological ethics, rooted in Kantian principles, supports this view by emphasizing duty and moral obligation over consequences alone. From this perspective, society has a duty to ensure that every individual’s rights to health are fulfilled, regardless of cost or outcome. Deontologists argue that healthcare providers and policymakers have a moral obligation to prioritize individuals’ rights to health, advocating for policies that uphold these duties and protect vulnerable populations. The emphasis on duties and principles offers a moral compass that prioritizes human dignity and fairness, aligning with the core tenets of justice in healthcare (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019).

However, balancing individual rights with public health needs presents practical and ethical challenges. Policies must navigate the tension between respecting individual autonomy and securing collective well-being. For example, during health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, public health mandates like mask-wearing and vaccination campaigns exemplify the intersection of deontological duty (protecting individual rights and adhering to moral obligations) and utilitarian goals (maximizing overall health and safety). Such policies demonstrate how ethical principles inform real-world health decisions—aiming to protect both individual rights and societal interests (Gostin, 2016).

Effective health policy requires careful consideration of ethical principles to promote fairness and justice. Policymakers must craft legislation that protects individual rights while ensuring equitable access. For instance, programs like Medicare and Medicaid exemplify efforts to bridge the gap between healthcare as a right and the practical realities of delivery. These programs reflect an underlying moral commitment to health equity, which is fundamental to social justice (Daniels, 2001). Furthermore, stakeholder engagement is vital; patients, providers, and community members should have a voice in shaping policies that impact their rights and access. Such inclusive participation enhances the legitimacy and fairness of healthcare systems.

Ethically, viewing healthcare solely as a commodity or privilege leads to disparities and social injustices. Pavlakis and Roach (2021) argue that when healthcare is treated merely as a market commodity, it becomes vulnerable to profit-driven motives that prioritize financial gains over patient well-being. This commodification undermines the moral obligation to provide care based on need rather than ability to pay. Conversely, framing healthcare as a fundamental right imposes duties on society to ensure access and quality—a moral imperative grounded in the principles of justice, beneficence, and respect for persons. Such a perspective aligns with the care ethics approach, emphasizing compassion and relational responsibilities inherent in healthcare provision.

In conclusion, the ethical foundations of healthcare as a right emphasize justice, duty, and fairness. These principles guide policy and practice towards designing equitable and inclusive health systems that respect human dignity. While challenges remain in balancing individual rights and public health, applying deontological ethics provides a moral framework that emphasizes duties and obligations to all persons. Moving forward, policies should prioritize human rights, uphold moral duties, and foster stakeholder engagement to ensure that healthcare remains a fundamental right for everyone, transcending market forces and social inequalities.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Daniels, N. (2001). Justice, health, and healthcare. American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 2–16.
• Gostin, L. O. (2016). Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint (3rd ed.). University of California Press.
• Pavlakis, S., & Roach, E. (2021). Follow the money: Childhood health care disparities magnified by covid-19. Pediatric Neurology, 118, 32–34.
• World Health Organization. (2017, December 10). Health is a fundamental human right. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/health-as-a-human-right
• Greene, J. D. (2023). The dual-process theory of moral judgment does not deny that people can make compromise judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(6).
• Klunk, C. (2022). Health care: Neither right, privilege nor commodity. Pediatric Neurology, 128, 75.
• Mandal, J., Ponnambath, D., & Parija, S. (2016). Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine. Tropical Parasitology, 6(1), 5.