Heinonline Citation 25 Current Issues In Criminal Justice

Heinonlinecitation 25 Current Issues Crim Just 5592013content Downl

Heinonlinecitation 25 Current Issues Crim Just 5592013content Downl

HEINONLINE Citation: 25 Current Issues Crim. Just. Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline ( Wed Oct 30 21 :59:252013 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: &operation=go&searchType=O &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo= http: Review Courting Kids: Inside an Experimental Youth Court by Carla J Barrett New York University Press, 2013, 209 pp (ISBN: ) Sarah Ciftci * Historically, the juvenile justice system in the US was guided by the parens patriae philosophy, which acknowledged the need for alternative measures for responding to child offenders to those offered in the criminal courts. This concept emphasised rehabilitative and individualised models of justice in order to divert law-breaking children from a life of crime and allow their transition to adulthood free from the stigma of a criminal record (p 4). Following a racialised moral pan ic around youth violence and an ideological sh ift towards a system which valued retributive justice, the 1990s marked a new era of juvenile justice in the US, where draconian 'transfer laws ' either allowed or demanded the trying of children as adults by transferring children out of juvenile courts and into criminal courts. In the state of New York, however, such laws have operated since passage of the Juvenile Offender Law of 1978 (p 26). In her book, Courling Kids, Carla J Barrett provides an articulate and intelligent ethnographic study of the Manhattan Youth Part, an experimental court championed by Judge Corriero and dedicated to the prosecution of youths as adults in New York City . Primarily, this work explores the creative strategies employed by the Youth Part to simultaneously manage complex and problematic legislative requirements and the needs of the children who came before it, and asks us to reassess the current system, which is a constant source of frustration and contradiction for those working in and around it. To achieve this , Barrett adopts a qualitative mixed-methods approach consisting of observations, in-depth interviews and 'court narratives', a methodology that is detailed, justified and in line with immersion in the law in action . Collectively, this ethnography produces a rich analysis of the chosen phenomena as seen from the inside (Walter 2006:321). The presentation and interpretation of 'court narratives', in particular, allows Barrett to effectively portray the tactics of the Youth Part and Judge Corriero , and underlines the importance of such tactics to the achievement of justice. For example, Barrett details the case of ' Jeffrey' and the lengthy dialogue in which he and the Judge engaged over many court appearances (p 106). In this instance , the author engages the reader to form an understanding about how purposeful delay was exercised as a means for the Judge to accumulate evidence about a child's capacity for rehabilitation. Traditional views of time delays in the courtroom as an obstacle to justice are challenged. This is just one example of the effective mobilisation of courtroom narratives demonstrating calculated judicial discretion, an innovative courtroom culture and the individualised justice approaches exercised by Judge Corriero and the Youth Part. • PhD Srudem, Socio-Legal SlUdies , Departmem of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Sydne y. 560 CURRENT ISSUES IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE VOLUME 25 NUMBER I Further, through identifying and discussing the key inherent contradictions that arise from the prosecution of children as adults, Barrett offers a comprehensive and well-grounded critique of the Juvenile Offender Law and of transfer laws generally. Barrett suggests that the most fundamental contradiction at play is the inconsistency between a young offender's legal labelling as an adult while retaining the social status of a child (p 130). This raises issues around the simultaneous prosecution of young offenders in the family and criminal courts, as well as instances where young offenders might be considered 'child victims' by the law. [t allows Barrett to move seamlessly into her final chapter, where she argues that transfer laws simply do not work in terms of deterrence or public safety. Instead, they serve to criminalise and demonise young people who, by their adolescence, should be afforded differential treatment before the law. She aptly puts forward this question for further debate: If transfer laws create sllch convoluted and contradictory challenges for case processing, which in turn require court actors to develop special strategies that work to ignore, sidestep, circumvent, reinvent" or accommodate the intent of those laws, then might not the legitimacy of the routine prosecution of youths as if they were adult be suspect? (p 151). For this reader, one of Barrett's most salient points is made when she attempts to evaluate the success of the Youth Part, Here she notes that too much attention is given to recidivism rates, Although considering such rates is a common method of evaluation, focusing solely on them overlooks important court functions other than deterrence. As such, Barrett utilises the concept of procedural justice - a concept she highlights as being particularly relevant given its focus on a subjective sense of fairness with the process itself, rather than mere outcomes (p 157). This is a valuable point for two reasons. First, it enforces her qualitative, interpretivist epistemology. Second, it holds the potential to inform future naturalistic, evaluative research of projects, programs and experiments in the context of social and legal justice. To this end, she advocates that the Manhattan Youth PaJt was highly successful as it gave children and their families a voice in court by creating an alternative court culture that was less adversarial and found spaces within the law in order to re-imagine the philosophy of parens patTiae. The concluding sentences cement this socio-Iegal writing as a triumphant piece of scholarly activism that wastes no words. Barrett recommends reform to transfer laws and powelfully states: ' True success of the work of the Manhattan Youth Part would be passage of new state legislation that would simply render the court unnecessary ' (p 168). Her work fills a void in ethnographic research into the criminal prosecution of children as adults and calls for further research to be conducted. This delimited book is a timely examination of a subject worth exploring and is a must-read for scholars, practitioners and any person interested in the area of juvenile justice the world over. Statute NY Juvenile Offender Law, 1978 NY Laws ch 481 Reference Walter M (2006) Social Research Methods: An Australian Perspective, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 2006 Book Review Project Produce 4- 5 page review of the book. Please just use the book as source no outside source thank you. Please add a reference page of the citation of the book Provided a SAMPLE of a book review. Please just use the book as source no outside source thank you.

Paper For Above instruction

Carla J. Barrett’s book, "Courting Kids: Inside an Experimental Youth Court," provides an insightful ethnographic examination of the specialized Manhattan Youth Part, a court dedicated to trying youth offenders as adults in New York City. Through this detailed qualitative study, Barrett delves into the complex interplay between legislative mandates, judicial discretion, and the realities faced by young offenders and court actors. The book challenges conventional perceptions of juvenile justice by highlighting the nuances of courtroom practices and the implications of transfer laws, which aim to prosecute minors as adults but often produce contradictory and unintended consequences.

One of the core strengths of Barrett’s work lies in her methodology, which combines observations, in-depth interviews, and court narratives. This approach offers a richly detailed inside view of the court’s daily functioning and captures the tactics used by Judge Corriero and other courtroom actors to navigate legal complexities while striving to deliver individualised justice. For instance, Barrett vividly recounts the case of Jeffrey, illustrating how judicial discretion and strategic delays serve as tools to assess a child's capacity for rehabilitation. This counters traditional views that perceive delays as merely obstructive and underscores the importance of judicial tact and procedural justice.

In her analysis, Barrett emphasizes the inherent contradictions in the legal treatment of youth prosecuted as adults. The most fundamental contradiction is the juxtaposition of a young person’s classification as an adult criminal while socially remaining a child. This duality results in overlapping jurisdictional issues, where youths are simultaneously subject to criminal and juvenile court processes. Barrett argues that these conflicting legal identities generate confusion and inconsistent treatment, often leading court actors to develop creative strategies to circumvent or reinterpret the law’s intent. This situation underscores the problematic nature of transfer laws, which Barrett suggests are ineffective in promoting public safety or deterrence.

Furthermore, Barrett critiques the efficacy of transfer laws by asserting they serve primarily to criminalize and demonize youth rather than protect the public. She points out that the supposed deterrent value of trying children as adults is questionable, as such laws often exacerbate the stigmatization and marginalization of young offenders. Instead of promoting rehabilitation, transfer laws tend to reinforce a punitive approach that criminalizes adolescence. Her examination reveals that the real success of the Youth Part lies in its ability to create a less adversarial, more participatory courtroom environment where youth and families can have a voice—aligning with the principles of procedural justice.

Barrett’s discussion of procedural justice is particularly compelling, emphasizing that perceptions of fairness within the courtroom are crucial for legitimacy and effective justice. She suggests that her ethnographic findings demonstrate that giving youth a voice and fostering an environment less dominated by adversarial tactics can improve compliance and reduce recidivism in the long term. This perspective marks a significant departure from traditional focus solely on deterrence and recidivism rates, broadening the scope of evaluating juvenile justice practices.

The book’s conclusion advocates reforming or abolishing transfer laws altogether, proposing that the best outcome would be to create a legal system that does not require such measures. Barrett envisions a future where the juvenile justice system focuses on rehabilitation and procedural fairness, potentially rendering specialized courts unnecessary. Her work is a call for reimagining juvenile justice along more humane, equitable lines—an essential contribution to debates on juvenile law reform.

Overall, "Courting Kids" is a vital ethnographic contribution that challenges misconceptions about youth offenders and offers practical insights into courtroom strategies, legal contradictions, and innovative justice practices. Barrett’s detailed narrative and nuanced analysis make this a crucial read for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers interested in juvenile justice reform. The book underscores that transformative change in youth justice relies on understanding the lived realities of court actors and creating systems rooted in fairness, dignity, and rehabilitation.

References

• Barrett, C. J. (2013). Courting Kids: Inside an Experimental Youth Court. New York: New York University Press.
• Walter, M. (2006). Social Research Methods: An Australian Perspective. Oxford University Press.