Hello, I Need Assistance With This PowerPoint 3011 Group

Hello I Need Assistance With This Power Pointism 3011 Group Assignmen

Hello I need assistance with this power point. ISM 3011 Group Assignment 2/ Project 2 As a group, select an article written in 2018 on a new technology (excluded topics: games, tablets, cell phones). Then, prepare a ten-slide proofread PowerPoint presentation summarizing the new technology, explaining how it works, describing its advantages and disadvantages, stating the cost, and explaining why it is a useful technological invention. The slide before the references should contain a copy of the selected article (not just the link). The presentation must cite at least two sources. The first slide should include the full names of all group members, the professor's name, the semester, and the date. The last slide should include only the references. All students must upload the PowerPoint file by the deadline to receive credit for the group project.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Technological innovation continues to shape the modern world, impacting various sectors such as healthcare, manufacturing, transportation, and communication. The rapid development and implementation of new technologies require awareness and understanding of their functions, benefits, and drawbacks. This paper presents a detailed overview of a groundbreaking 2018 technological invention, specifically focusing on the development of Biohybrid Robots—a promising field that merges biological components with robotic systems, offering transformative potential in multiple applications.

Overview of the Technology

Biohybrid robots represent an integration of living tissues with robotic structures, enabling devices that can operate using biological functions. The core concept involves engineering living muscle tissues, or biological cells, that can actuate mechanical movements, thereby creating autonomous or remotely controlled robots (Shukla & Karmakar, 2018). These biohybrid systems harness advantages of both biological and robotic components—biological tissues provide flexible, energy-efficient actuation, while robotic frameworks offer structural support and control capabilities. Scientists develop these systems using tissue engineering techniques, integrating neuronal and muscular tissues onto flexible substrates and employing bioelectronic interfaces for control (Vogel & Peppas, 2018).

How the Technology Works

Biohybrid robots operate through a combination of biological processes and electronic control mechanisms. The biological tissues, such as muscle cells derived from stem cells, are cultivated and aligned on flexible scaffolds. Once matured, these tissues contract in response to electrical stimuli, mimicking natural muscle movements (Shukla & Karmakar, 2018). These contractions generate mechanical motion, which can be utilized for locomotion or manipulation tasks. External electronic controls modulate electrical signals sent to the biological tissues, enabling precise movement commands. In some cases, neural interfaces are embedded to enhance control and responsiveness, mimicking natural neuromuscular pathways (Vogel & Peppas, 2018). These systems often incorporate sensors to monitor tissue health and environmental responses, allowing for real-time adjustments.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages

Biohybrid robots offer several compelling benefits. First, their biological components provide high energy efficiency and adaptability, allowing them to function for extended periods with minimal energy input (Shukla & Karmakar, 2018). Second, they can operate in environments unsuitable for traditional robots, such as within the human body, facilitating minimally invasive medical interventions like targeted drug delivery or tissue repair (Vogel & Peppas, 2018). Third, their ability to regenerate and heal, akin to living tissues, can potentially increase durability and lifespan compared to conventional mechanical systems.

Disadvantages

Despite their promise, biohybrid systems face significant challenges. One primary concern is maintaining tissue viability and preventing degradation over time, which affects performance and reliability (Shukla & Karmakar, 2018). The complex processes involved in cultivating and integrating biological tissues increase manufacturing costs and technical complexity. Additionally, ethical considerations arise regarding the use of biological materials and the potential for unintended biological interactions (Vogel & Peppas, 2018). Finally, achieving precise and scalable control mechanisms remains an ongoing research challenge, limiting current applications mostly to laboratory or experimental stages.

Cost Implications

The development and production of biohybrid robots are currently costly due to the specialized materials, equipment, and expertise required (Shukla & Karmakar, 2018). Costs encompass tissue engineering processes, bioelectronic interface development, and sterile laboratory environments necessary for cultivating living tissues. As research advances and manufacturing techniques improve, costs are expected to decrease, making these technologies more accessible for practical applications. Nonetheless, at present, biohybrid robots are primarily in experimental and prototype phases, with limited commercial availability.

Why It Is a Useful Technological Invention

Biohybrid robots represent a significant leap forward in robotics and biomedical engineering. Their ability to mimic biological functions enables applications in medicine, such as targeted therapy, regenerative medicine, and bio-sensing (Vogel & Peppas, 2018). Furthermore, their energy efficiency and adaptability make them ideal candidates for soft robotics—a rapidly growing field addressing tasks in complex, unstructured environments. The potential for autonomous healing and regeneration extends their utility beyond traditional robots, promising innovations in long-term deployment and sustainability. As research progresses, biohybrid systems could revolutionize healthcare, environmental monitoring, and industrial automation, marking them as one of the most promising technological inventions of the 21st century.

Conclusion

Biohybrid robots exemplify cutting-edge innovation at the intersection of biology and robotics. Their unique ability to combine living tissues with mechanical systems offers numerous advantages, including energy efficiency, adaptability, and novel applications in medicine and environmental sciences. While challenges persist, ongoing research and technological advancement promise to overcome current limitations, leading to more practical and widespread deployment. As such, biohybrid robotics stand to make profound impacts across various sectors, embodying the potential of interdisciplinary scientific progress.

References

- Shukla, S., & Karmakar, S. (2018). Biohybrid robots: Design, control, and applications. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 102, 1-14.

- Vogel, V., & Peppas, N. A. (2018). Biohybrid systems: Biological and synthetic materials for next-generation robotics. Science Advances, 4(9), eaaq0512.

- Kim, J., et al. (2019). Advances in biohybrid robot development: Principles and applications. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine, 4(2), e10148.

- Matsuoka, H., et al. (2020). Tissue engineering for biohybrid robotics. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 10.

- Costa, P., & Russo, R. (2021). Ethical considerations in biohybrid robotics. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 369-382.

- Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Energy efficiency in biological-robotic systems. Energy & Environmental Science, 15(4), 1673-1685.

- Lee, D., et al. (2021). Scalability challenges in biohybrid systems. Biotechnology Advances, 48, 107724.

- Singh, R., & Patel, S. (2022). Medical applications of biohybrid robots. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 18(2), e2382.

- Zhang, L., et al. (2023). Future prospects of biohybrid robotics in environmental monitoring. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(2), 711-720.

- Ahmed, S., & Basu, S. (2017). The biology and biomechanics of muscle tissue engineering. BioMed Research International, 2017, 1-10.