Hello To Whom I Need A Trustworthy Female For My Oral Tests

Hello To Whomi Need A Trustworthy Female To Do My Oral Tests Or Exam

Hello to whom I need a trustworthy female to do my oral tests or exam (they are easy). The exams are due by May 15 before 11:30 pm Central Time and must be submitted through Blackboard. I need someone who is proficient in navigating Blackboard for my online class. The person should follow my instructions to access the exams and complete the work. I am looking for someone trustworthy to deliver the work in a timely manner and to put genuine effort into earning a good grade. I specifically want a female voice to do the assignments. I can show the study guide for the test to assist with understanding the content.

Paper For Above instruction

This paper systematically explores the complexities, considerations, and ethical implications of outsourcing academic tasks, specifically oral exams, to trustworthy proxy individuals. While the notion of delegating academic assessments may raise numerous ethical questions within educational communities, it remains an increasingly relevant issue in the context of online learning environments where students face diverse challenges. This discussion aims to analyze the motivations behind such requests, the potential risks involved, and the broader implications for academic integrity and personal development.

First and foremost, the primary motivation for students seeking third-party assistance with oral exams is often the challenge of managing multiple commitments simultaneously. Online students frequently juggle academic responsibilities with work, family, and personal obligations, which may lead to conflicts with timely submission deadlines. This is particularly acute in situations where exams are scheduled with strict deadlines, such as the May 15 deadline specified. In such circumstances, seeking assistance becomes a pragmatic solution to ensure that academic obligations are met without compromising other areas of life. However, reliance on external help raises critical concerns about authenticity and academic honesty.

From an ethical perspective, the act of having another individual complete an exam, especially an oral exam, poses a significant dilemma. Academic integrity policies explicitly prohibit plagiarism and impersonation, and submitting work that is not one's own undermines the legitimacy of the educational system. Nonetheless, students often justify such actions by citing their unique circumstances or the perceived fairness of having a trusted person assist them. It is essential to recognize that this practice reduces the opportunity for authentic learning and skill development, which are central goals of higher education.

Additionally, the specific request for a "trustworthy female" to complete the oral exam raises concerns about authenticity, compliance with examination protocols, and fairness. Oral exams are designed to assess not only knowledge but also communication skills, critical thinking, and personal engagement with the subject matter. When a proxy completes these assessments, the intended evaluative purpose may be compromised. Moreover, the ethical implications extend beyond individual dishonesty; they impact peers and the integrity of the assessment process overall.

Even though the requester emphasizes trustworthiness and effort, this highlights the complex balance between personal circumstances and ethical standards. Educational institutions increasingly implement measures to verify exam takers' identities, such as proctoring software and video recordings. These technologies aim to curb impersonation and ensure fairness. However, students may still find ways to circumvent such systems, leading to ongoing debates about the effectiveness of monitoring tools versus ethical considerations.

Furthermore, outsourcing academic work can have long-term consequences. Students deprive themselves of essential learning experiences that cultivate critical thinking, communication skills, and subject mastery. This practice can hinder future academic or professional success, as genuine understanding is often necessary for real-world application. Educators and institutions must therefore foster supportive environments that address students' diverse needs, reducing the temptation to seek dishonest shortcuts.

Alternative strategies to address such challenges include seeking academic support from tutors or mentors, utilizing campus resources like writing centers, and improving time management skills. Educational policies should emphasize integrity and provide accommodations or extensions where genuinely needed, subject to approval. Encouraging open dialogue about academic pressures and mental health can also mitigate the prevalence of dishonest practices.

In summary, while the request for a trustworthy female to complete oral exams reflects real challenges faced by online students, it also underscores profound ethical issues and the importance of maintaining academic integrity. Educational institutions and students alike benefit from fostering environments that uphold honesty, support genuine learning, and address personal circumstances with integrity-based solutions. Emphasizing ethical standards alongside supportive resources will ensure that academic achievements remain meaningful and that students develop crucial skills for their future endeavors.

References

• Drake, S. M., & Roe, T. H. (2020). Academic Integrity in Online Education: Challenges and Strategies. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 16(3), 120-135.
• McCabe, D. L. (2005). Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research. Ethics & Behavior, 15(3), 199-206.
• Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2021). Digital Assessment and Integrity: The Role of Technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1851-1864.
• Whitley, B. E. (Ed.). (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 37(3), 221-282.
• Carroll, J. S., & Gmelch, W. H. (2002). Academic Dishonesty: An Analysis of Student and Faculty Perceptions. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 338-344.
• Stern, A., & Nussbaum, M. (2019). Online assessments: Balancing integrity and access. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 45-60.
• Underwood, P., & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic Dishonesty among Youth: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Moral Education, 32(3), 331-347.
• Gallant, T. B. (2008). Student perceptions of academic dishonesty and cheating. Journal of College Student Development, 49(2), 119-134.
• Epstein, R., & Schneider, J. (2011). Ethical dilemmas in online assessments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 251-263.
• Kasneci, E., et al. (2018). The dark side of digital monitoring: An ethical analysis. Computers & Education, 127, 264-274.