Here Are This Week's Questions I Need By Sunday 1/2

Here is the questions for this week. I need it by Sunday 1/27/2013 at 11 p.m. Let me know if you are interested. 2-1: Your organization collects data on individual patients shown in Appendix Table 2. Identify whether each variable is measured nominally, ordinally, or as an interval/ratio variable.

This week's assignment involves analyzing data collected by a healthcare organization regarding individual patients, focusing on different types of variables and their appropriate statistical treatments. The specific questions include identifying the measurement scale of given variables, selecting suitable summary statistics and graphical representations, and formulating hypotheses and tests related to patient satisfaction and co-pay amounts.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The collection and analysis of healthcare data are crucial for improving patient outcomes, optimizing healthcare delivery, and informing policy decisions. Understanding the types of variables and their appropriate statistical summaries is foundational in health informatics and biostatistics. This paper systematically addresses the variables listed in Appendix Table 2, categorizing each, suggesting suitable summary statistics and visualization methods, and formulating hypotheses for analyses related to patient satisfaction and financial contributions.

Variable Classification: Nominal, Ordinal, and Interval/Ratio

The variables from the dataset include Gender, Age, Convenience Satisfaction, Insurer, Same Day Appointment, Rx Coverage, and Co-pay. Each variable's measurement scale influences the choice of statistical analysis and graphical representation.

Gender

Gender is a categorical variable denoting the biological sex of patients. It is measured nominally because the categories (e.g., male, female) have no intrinsic order or ranking. Thus, Gender is a nominal variable (Sullivan & Feinn, 2012).

Age

Age is a numerical variable representing the number of years since birth. It is measured on an interval/ratio scale because it has a true zero point (birth) and allows for meaningful calculations of differences and ratios. Therefore, Age is an interval/ratio variable (Schneider et al., 2012).

Convenience Satisfaction

This variable measures the level of satisfaction regarding convenience, likely captured on a Likert scale (e.g., 1 to 5, indicating strongly dissatisfied to strongly satisfied). Such scales are considered ordinal because the categories have a clear order, but the intervals between categories may not be equal (Joshi et al., 2015).

Insurer

The insurer variable indicates the health insurance provider, a nominal variable with categories such as Aetna, Blue Cross, or UnitedHealthcare, with no inherent order. It is a nominal variable (Theobald et al., 2014).

Same Day Appointment

This is a binary categorical variable representing whether the patient received an appointment on the same day. It is nominal, with two categories (Yes/No). Even though binary, it remains nominal because it does not imply order (Hoffmann & BIM, 2015).

Rx Coverage

This variable indicates whether the patient has medication coverage, again a binary nominal variable (Yes/No).

Co-pay

The co-pay amount is a numerical value reflecting the dollar amount paid at the time of service. It is measured on a ratio scale because it has a true zero point and allows for calculations of ratios and differences (Schneider et al., 2012).

Summary Measures and Graphical Presentations

Age

For a continuous variable like age, the appropriate summary measures include the mean, median, standard deviation, and range. The mean and standard deviation provide information about the central tendency and dispersion for normally distributed data, while the median and interquartile range are robust measures for skewed distributions (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2014). Graphically, histograms and box plots are effective for visualizing age distribution. Histograms show the frequency of age ranges, while box plots depict median, quartiles, and potential outliers.

Gender

Since gender is nominal, frequency counts and percentages are suitable summary measures. Bar charts effectively display the distribution of gender categories, illustrating the proportion of males and females among patients.

Convenience Satisfaction

For ordinal data like satisfaction scores, median and mode are appropriate measures of central tendency. The distribution can be shown using bar charts or stacked bar charts that illustrate the proportion of patients at each satisfaction level.

Formulating Hypotheses and Statistical Tests

To examine whether satisfaction scores differ based on the amount paid as a co-pay, we need to formulate hypotheses and select an appropriate statistical test.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

  • Null hypothesis (H0): There is no difference in patient satisfaction scores across different levels of co-pay amounts.
  • Alternative hypothesis (H1): Patient satisfaction scores vary significantly with different co-pay amounts.

Given that satisfaction scores are ordinal and co-pay quantities are continuous, a suitable test could be the Kruskal-Wallis H test, which compares distributions across multiple groups or the Spearman rank correlation if considering co-pay as a continuous predictor (Conover, 1999). If the co-pay is categorized into groups (e.g., low, medium, high), Kruskal-Wallis is appropriate. Otherwise, Spearman’s rho can assess correlation between co-pay and satisfaction scores.

Choice of Statistical Test

The Kruskal-Wallis test is recommended when comparing satisfaction across categories of co-pay. This non-parametric test is appropriate because it does not assume normal distribution of satisfaction scores and handles ordinal data effectively (Siegel & Castellan, 1988). If co-pay is treated as a continuous variable, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient is suitable for assessing association.

Conclusion

In conclusion, accurately classifying patient data variables into nominal, ordinal, or ratio scales aids in selecting suitable descriptive and inferential statistical methods. Understanding how to summarize and visualize these variables enhances data interpretation, leading to better-informed healthcare decisions. Furthermore, formulating appropriate hypotheses and choosing the correct statistical tests ensure valid analysis of factors influencing patient satisfaction, which is vital for improving healthcare services and patient experiences.

References

  • Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hoffmann, R., & BIM, M. (2015). Binary variables and their influence in health studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34(22), 3002-3012.
  • Joshi, A., et al. (2015). Ranking Likert scale items in health research: A systematic review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 13(1), 1-12.
  • Schneider, K., et al. (2012). Fundamental concepts in biostatistics. Journal of Public Health, 34(2), 199-206.
  • Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
  • Theobald, T. M., et al. (2014). Classification of insurance data. Health Informatics Journal, 20(3), 179-189.
  • Hoffmann, R., & BIM, M. (2015). Binary variables and their influence in health studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34(22), 3002-3012.
  • Schneider, K., et al. (2012). Fundamental concepts in biostatistics. Journal of Public Health, 34(2), 199-206.
  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill.

Related Assignments