Hi Wisline, You've Made Changes In The Essay And Chen Arti

Hi Wisline Youve Made Changes In The Essay And The Chen Article See

Hi Wisline. You've made changes in the essay and the Chen article seems like a useful addition. And it is still apparent that you are making the point that our privacy is becoming more and more compromised with the new technologies in use and the fact that old data never seems to die. However, as noted here and on the prior draft, work is still needed to introduce and integrate sources effectively. You give Tolentino's chapter title and her full name, but do not do this with the other sources.

And, there is a brief attempt to tell the reader what her chapter covers, but this doesn't happen with the other authors. If we can somehow discuss this this week, it might help. Otherwise, please see the examples I give in the "Basic MLA" handout and other handouts in Course Information in BB and the Purdue OWL website for help with this going into the 3rd draft, which will be the final draft of this essay in your portfolio.

Paper For Above instruction

The ongoing evolution of digital technology has profoundly impacted privacy norms, making personal data increasingly vulnerable and difficult to secure. This essay explores the ways in which technological advancements have contributed to the erosion of privacy, emphasizing how old data persists and is used in new contexts. Central to this discussion is the analysis of contemporary scholarly perspectives, particularly the insights of Jia Tolentino and other key authors who examine the societal implications of digital data retention and misuse.

The core argument centers on the notion that privacy is no longer a static concept but a fluid aspect of modern life subjected to constant technological intrusions. Tolentino, in her chapter titled "The Age of Data," examines how digital footprints shape individual identities and influence societal structures. Her exploration highlights that once information is digital, it becomes nearly impossible to fully erase, thus perpetually exposing individuals to potential harm. This persistence illustrates a crucial aspect of modern privacy concerns: the permanence of old data and its capacity to resurface in new and unintended ways (Tolentino, 2019).

Other scholarly sources reinforce this perspective by discussing the mechanisms through which data is collected, stored, and exploited. Solove (2021) outlines the legal and ethical challenges faced by individuals and policymakers in protecting privacy rights amidst widespread data commodification. Similarly, Zuboff’s (2019) examination of surveillance capitalism underscores how corporations accumulate vast amounts of personal data to predict and influence consumer behavior, often without explicit consent.

While Tolentino provides a detailed analysis of digital footprints and personal identity, other authors contribute insights into the broader societal and economic frameworks enabling privacy erosion. Julia Angwin (2018) explores how data breaches and corporate practices compromise transparency and accountability. Conversely, Bruce Schneier (2020) argues for the necessity of robust encryption technologies to safeguard individual privacy in a digitally connected world.

To effectively convey these complex issues, the essay must integrate sources seamlessly, providing clear context for each author's contribution. For instance, introducing Tolentino’s chapter as a key exploration of digital permanence offers a foundation to discuss other perspectives. Including concise summaries of other works — such as Solove’s focus on legal challenges or Zuboff’s critique of surveillance capitalism — helps create a comprehensive narrative that illustrates the multifaceted threats to privacy.

This integrated approach enhances the argumentative coherence of the essay, emphasizing that the erosion of privacy is multifactorial—driven by technological innovation, corporate interests, and insufficient legal protections. Additionally, adopting effective citation strategies, as demonstrated in the “Basic MLA” handout and Purdue OWL resources, ensures scholarly credibility and clarity. Properly attributing sources not only strengthens the argument but also demonstrates academic rigor.

Looking ahead, revising the essay by explicitly introducing and summarizing each source — with consistent referencing of authors’ full names and chapter titles — will further improve clarity and scholarly integrity. Crafting well-structured paragraphs that connect each author's ideas to the central thesis will bolster the essay’s persuasiveness. Engaging critically with the sources, rather than merely listing their viewpoints, will showcase the writer’s analytical skills.

In conclusion, the synthesis of diverse scholarly perspectives underscores a critical reality: in the digital age, privacy is increasingly fragile, with old data continually resurfacing to threaten individual autonomy and security. By improving the integration of sources, clarifying each author’s contributions, and adhering to scholarly citation standards, the essay can effectively communicate the complex interplay between technological innovation and privacy degradation. Such a nuanced approach not only enhances academic quality but also raises awareness of vital societal issues in our increasingly digital world.

References

Angwin, J. (2018). Dragnet Nation: A quest for privacy, security, and freedom in a world turned upside down. St. Martin's Press.

Schneier, B. (2020). Data and Goliath: The hidden battles to collect your data and control your world. W. W. Norton & Company.

Solove, D. J. (2021). Understanding Privacy. Harvard University Press.

Tolentino, J. (2019). The Age of Data. Harper Collins.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.