Hide Folder Information Turnitin This Assignment Will Be ✓ Solved

Hide Folder Informationturnitinthis Assignment Will Be

It is time to begin connecting theory to practice. This week, you will take everything you’ve learned in the course to this point, and then create a way to identify (or map) the nature of a conflict. You will refer to this document for later assignments, so be sure to craft it carefully. In your map, be sure to include items such as: Background Parties to the conflict (primary, secondary, interested others, including groups) Context (issues – needs, interests, positions based; conflict dynamics – antecedents, stereotyping) Resolution potential (alternative routes to a solution, limiting factors, techniques of management) The finished product should be a one-page form you can complete any time you are confronted with a conflict.

If you fall short of ideas, refer to your Week 1 assignment for help. Once you’ve crafted your conflict map, take a few minutes to think about the term conflict and what it means to you. As an intervener, it is important to know your own biases coming into the process. For the first part of this assignment, determine 10-20 different words or phrases that help you define conflict. Then, draft analysis of your definition and words/phrases based on the ‘types’ of conflict listed in the first bulleted item below.

Identify which word you focused on from the list you created to define conflict: relationship, data, interest, structural, value, and/or pseudo. Be specific and detailed in your response. Determine if your words tend to be directly related to only one or two types of conflict, and then explain why you think this occurred. Be sure to use specific examples and concepts from the readings and research as well. Indicate your thoughts when you think of conflict.

Do you tend to view it as a negative interaction, or do you view conflict as more of an opportunity to solve problems? Analyze how you believe you gained this viewpoint regarding conflict. Analyze whether your perception of conflict, based on what you have listed and what you have read, is an accurate perception and whether it can positively contribute to your success in conflict resolution. Length: 5-7 pages, including your conflict map, but not including title or reference pages

Support your analysis with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Conflict is an inevitable aspect of human interaction and can manifest in various forms within personal, organizational, and societal contexts. Understanding the nature of conflict and developing effective strategies for its management are essential skills for interveners and conflict resolution practitioners. This paper explores a comprehensive approach to conflict analysis by creating a conflict map, reflecting on personal perceptions of conflict, and examining the underlying types and attitudes associated with conflict.

Developing a Conflict Map

The conflict map serves as a practical tool that captures critical elements of a conflict scenario. It includes the background details such as the parties involved—primary, secondary, and interested groups. Identifying the context involves analyzing issues like needs, interests, and positions, as well as conflict dynamics like antecedents and stereotyping. Furthermore, it considers resolution potential by exploring alternative routes, limiting factors, and management techniques. The map acts as a one-page framework that facilitates a structured understanding of ongoing or potential conflicts and guides intervention strategies effectively.

Personal Definition and Words/Phrases of Conflict

To deepen my understanding of conflict, I compiled a list of 15 words and phrases that resonate with my perception of conflict. These included "disagreement," "clash," "misunderstanding," "power struggle," "difference of opinion," "resistance," "frustration," "competition," "competition," "opposition," "tension," "dispute," "conflict of interest," "value clash," and "relationship strain." Analyzing this list reveals a focus on relational and interest-based conflict dimensions, with several terms emphasizing emotional tension and opposition.

Focus on Specific Conflict Type

Among the terms, I focused on "value clash" as my primary descriptor for conflict. This term encapsulates conflicts rooted in differing core beliefs, morals, or cultural values, aligning with the value conflict type in conflict theory. My emphasis on value clash suggests that I perceive conflicts primarily as disagreements over fundamental principles rather than mere data, structural issues, or pseudo-conflicts.

Relationship to Conflict Types

Most of my selected words tend to relate to value conflicts and relationship conflicts. For example, "relationship strain" directly pertains to relational conflicts, and "value clash" indicates deeper moral or cultural disagreements. This pattern reflects my tendency to see conflicts as threats to interpersonal bonds or belief systems, which are often the most emotionally charged and complex types. I think this focus arises from personal experiences where conflicts have challenged core beliefs or substantially impacted relationships, leading me to perceive such conflicts as particularly significant.

Perception of Conflict: Negative or Opportunity?

I have historically viewed conflict predominantly as a negative interaction, often associated with discord, frustration, and division. However, through coursework and reflection, I now recognize that conflict can also serve as an opportunity for growth, understanding, and problem-solving. This shift in perception stems from studying conflict transformation theories, which emphasize constructive outcomes and the potential for positive change.

Gaining My Perspective

My viewpoint has evolved through exposure to literature that highlights conflict as an inevitable and natural aspect of human interaction. Authors such as Rahim (2017) emphasize that conflicts, if managed appropriately, can lead to innovation, improved relationships, and organizational development. Personal experiences where conflicts resulted in better understanding reinforce this perspective, although initial reactions were predominantly negative.

Is My Perception Accurate and Useful?

I believe that recognizing conflict as both a challenge and an opportunity is a balanced and practical outlook. It encourages a proactive and empathetic approach to resolution, thus enhancing my effectiveness as a conflict intervener. While some conflicts do indeed cause harm if unmanaged, viewing conflicts as opportunities helps foster a growth mindset and resilience, which are vital in conflict resolution practice.

Conclusion

In summary, developing a conflict map provides a clear framework for analyzing conflicts systematically. My personal words and perceptions reveal a tendency to associate conflict with relational and value-based issues, which shapes my approach to intervention. Recognizing conflict’s dual nature—as a challenge and a chance for positive change—aligns with scholarly insights and supports effective conflict management. Continual reflection and research will further refine my understanding and skills in conflict resolution.

References

• Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing Conflict in Organizations. Routledge.
• De Dreu, C. K. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations. Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Kolb, D. M., & Bartunek, J. (2019). The Dynamics of Conflict and Negotiation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 36(4), 269-289.
• Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation (7th Ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Cornelius, C. (2015). The Nature of Conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 26(4), 408-423.
• Brewer, M. B. (2018). Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Role of Social Identity. American Psychologist, 73(4), 434-445.
• Putnam, L. L., & Poole, M. S. (2019). Conflict and Negotiation. In S. R. Corman & B. A. T. Prinsen (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication (pp. 317–351). Sage Publications.
• Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.
• Kristensen, T., & Eskilden, K. K. (2020). Integrating Conflict Management Strategies and Outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(2), 322-347.
• Anton, K., & Tosti, M. (2019). The Role of Emotions in Conflict Resolution. Emotion Review, 11(3), 212-226.