Him 500 Module Three Activity Guidelines And Rubric

Him 500 Module Three Activity Guidelines And Rubric This Activity W

This activity will introduce you to the electronic health record (EHR), the types of information in an EHR, how the records are used, and who uses them. For this activity, complete the following:

1. Complete the MindTap Quick Check for Chapters 4 and 5 in Essentials of Health Information Management: Principles and Practices.

2. Complete the MindTap Learning Lab for Chapters 4 and 5 in Essentials of Health Information Management: Principles and Practices.

3. Answer the following questions:

• What is an EHR?
• What types of information are found in an EHR?
• Who manages an EHR?
• How is it used?
• Does an EHR follow the patient to other health facilities? Explain.

Note on the MindTap activities: Click on the Cengage MindTap link to access this resource.

Guidelines for Submission: Complete the MindTap activities within MindTap.

The answers to the questions should be in a Word document and should be a minimum of 1 page in length. All sources should be cited using APA style.

Paper For Above instruction

Electronic health records (EHRs) are digital versions of patients’ paper charts that streamline and enhance healthcare delivery by providing comprehensive, accessible, and up-to-date patient information. EHRs serve as an integrated repository of patient health data, facilitating communication among various healthcare providers, improving care coordination, and supporting clinical decision-making. Their purpose is to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of healthcare by offering accurate and timely information that guides treatment and management of patients (Hersh, 2017).

An EHR contains a multitude of information types, including demographic data (such as name, date of birth, and insurance details), medical history, medication lists, allergies, immunizations, laboratory test results, diagnostic imaging, progress notes, treatment plans, and discharge summaries. These data elements help providers make informed decisions, track health trends over time, and ensure continuity of care (Häyrinen, Saranto, & Nykänen, 2008). Additionally, EHRs may include billing information and administrative data, which facilitate the operational and financial aspects of healthcare institutions.

Management of an EHR is typically the responsibility of healthcare providers, such as physicians, nurses, and healthcare administrators, who are authorized to input, update, and access patient data. Health information management (HIM) professionals often oversee the organization and security of EHR systems, ensuring compliance with privacy laws like HIPAA and maintaining data integrity. In many healthcare facilities, dedicated IT staff also support the technical functioning of EHR systems and troubleshoot issues (Menachemi & Collum, 2011).

EHRs are designed to be accessible across multiple healthcare settings, enabling the patient's health information to follow them as they move between providers, specialists, laboratories, and hospitals. This portability enhances care coordination, reduces duplicate testing, and minimizes medical errors. When a patient receives care at different healthcare facilities, their EHR can be shared electronically with authorized providers, ensuring continuity of care. However, this depends on interoperability standards and the specific health information exchange capabilities of the facilities involved. In facilities with integrated EHR systems, the patient's records can be continuously updated and accessed regardless of the location, thus supporting a more holistic and patient-centered approach to healthcare (Vest & Gamm, 2010).

In conclusion, EHRs are essential tools in modern healthcare, improving clinical efficiencies, supporting better health outcomes, and ensuring seamless information flow across different healthcare providers and settings. Their management involves a combination of clinical, administrative, and technical personnel working collaboratively to safeguard patient privacy and ensure data accuracy and accessibility. As healthcare continues to evolve, the importance of interoperable and patient-centered electronic health records will only increase, shaping the future landscape of healthcare delivery.

References

• Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., & Nykänen, P. (2008). Definition, structure, content, use, and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 291–304.
• Hersh, W. R. (2017). A stimulus to define informatics and health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(2), 237–239.
• Menachemi, N., & Collum, T. H. (2011). Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 4, 47–55.
• Vest, J. R., & Gamm, L. D. (2010). Improved health information technology exchanges: How do we know they are making a difference? Medical Care Research and Review, 67(3), 259–272.
• Häyrinen, K., et al. (2008). Definition, structure, content, use, and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 291-304.
• Hersh, W. R. (2017). A stimulus to define informatics and health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(2), 237–239.
• Menachemi, N., & Collum, T. H. (2011). Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 4, 47–55.
• Vest, J. R., & Gamm, L. D. (2010). Improved health information technology exchanges: How do we know they are making a difference? Medical Care Research and Review, 67(3), 259–272.
• Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., & Nykänen, P. (2008). Definition, structure, content, use, and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 291–304.
• Hersh, W. R. (2017). A stimulus to define informatics and health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(2), 237–239.