Hints And Guidelines For Case Analysis - General Micro Incor

Hints And Guideline For Case Analysisgeneral Micro Incorporatedcase N

It is a case to be bought. And, you are responsible for buying your own case. This is an individual work. You should not collaborate with anyone in this case. You should submit your own words, not to be found in Google, turn-in or any other sources.

Please cite properly whenever it is appropriate. This is a case so you are free to put your own analysis. I would like to encourage that. However, at the minimum I am expecting following from you in the case.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

This case analysis focuses on the quality control and process capability assessment of General Micro Incorporated’s manufacturing process, as well as designing an experiment to optimize key process parameters affecting pull strength. The main objectives include constructing statistical process control (SPC) charts, interpreting process control status, evaluating process capability, and suggesting improvements based on experimental analysis.

Part 1: SPC Diagram and Process Control Interpretation

The first task involves drawing an SPC (Statistical Process Control) chart, typically a control chart for variables such as diameter, weight, or other measurements relevant to process quality. Since the case references Exhibit 6, which provides the necessary data, the chart can be constructed using data points plotted over time with control limits calculated based on process data. The control chart helps determine if the process is in statistically stable condition, indicated by points falling within control limits and exhibiting a random pattern. Conversely, patterns such as trends, cycles, or points outside control limits suggest special causes and an out-of-control process.

Interpreting the SPC diagram involves analyzing these patterns to assess performance. If all data points lie within control limits with no identifiable patterns, the process can be considered stable or "in control." Any deviations or violations imply that special causes are present, requiring investigation and corrective actions. Consistently in-control processes tend to produce predictable product quality, reducing variability and defects.

Part 2: Process Capability Analysis

Next, the process capability is evaluated to determine whether the process consistently produces products within specified limits. Since the case indicates there is only a Lower Specification Limit (LSL), the capability formula needs to be adjusted accordingly. Traditional capability indices like Cp and Cpk require both Upper Specification Limit (USL) and LSL, but in this scenario, capability must be assessed considering only the LSL.

The modified capability index can be calculated as:

Capability = (Mean - LSL) / (3 * standard deviation)

This measures how many standard deviations the process mean is above the LSL. A higher index indicates a capable process with less probability of producing out-of-specification units below the LSL.

Based on the data, the mean and standard deviation are computed from historical process data. If the index exceeds 1.33 (industry standard for acceptable capability), the process is considered capable at a 3-sigma level. If it reaches 2.0 or higher, it can be deemed six sigma capable, implying very minimal defect levels. Conversely, an index below 1.0 suggests the process does not meet the specification consistently.

Part 3: Design of Experiment and Optimization

The third part involves designing an experiment to optimize process parameters such as power, time, force, and temperature with the goal of maximizing pull strength. Exhibit 8 contains test data illustrating how these factors influence pull strength. A systematic approach, such as Design of Experiments (DOE), can identify the optimal combination of parameters.

To simplify the analysis, multiple regression analysis can be employed, especially if familiar with this method. This involves fitting a statistical model to predict pull strength based on the four factors. The regression equation, derived from the experimental data, enables estimation of the effects and interactions between variables, guiding toward the parameter set that yields maximum pull strength.

If conducting DOE, a factorial or fractional factorial design can be used to evaluate main effects and interactions efficiently. Proper randomization and replication improve the robustness of conclusions. After analysis, the optimal levels of power, time, force, and temperature can be identified as those that produce the maximum predicted pull strength, considering process constraints and cost implications.

Conclusion

This analysis integrates control charting, capability assessment, and experimental design to enhance process understanding and improvements at General Micro Incorporated. Using SPC and capability analysis ensures process stability and meets quality standards, while DOE facilitates the optimization of process parameters to maximize product performance. Such systematic quality management approaches are essential in manufacturing to reduce variability, defects, and costs, ultimately delivering higher customer satisfaction.

References

• Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
• ISO. (2019). ISO 22514-1:2019, Statistical methods in process management — Capability and performance — Part 1: General principles. International Organization for Standardization.
• Dean, J., & Voss, D. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments (3rd ed.). Springer.
• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Educational Services.
• Levin, R. I. (2018). Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement. Pearson.
• Boudreaux, D. (2008). Process Capability Analysis in Manufacturing. Quality Progress, 41(3), 45-50.
• Taguchi, G., & Chowdhury, S. (2019). Robust Engineering Methods. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ryan, T. P. (2019). Modern Engineering Statistics. John Wiley & Sons.
• Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (2005). Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery (2nd ed.). Wiley-Interscience.
• NIST. (2021). Engineering Statistics Handbook. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/