Hipaa Privacy: A 44-Year-Old High School Teacher Called

Hipaa Privacyzameya A 44 Year Old High School Teacher Called Her Mom

HIPAA Privacy Zameya, a 44-year-old high school teacher, called her mom's physician and asked about the results from her mom's urinalysis taken at the office on the prior day. The temp office nurse indicated that they could not discuss results over the phone with anyone but the patient because of HIPAA. Zameya indicates that she was at the office the prior day with her mom and while in the examination room with her mom, the physician communicated openly about her mom's health, her condition and treatments as well as the need for the urinalysis. Consider the similarities and the differences of the above two scenarios and highlight them. Then indicate why HIPAA allows the second scenario and disallows the first. Finally, propose a way to correct the first scenario so that the results can be shared over the phone with Zameya.

Paper For Above instruction

The scenarios presented involve the same core event—access to a patient’s medical information—yet they differ significantly in their context and the legal reasoning behind HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) regulations. These differences fundamentally determine whether sharing information over the phone is permissible or not. Understanding the parallels and distinctions between these situations is crucial in appreciating how HIPAA's privacy rules function in real-world medical communication.

In the first scenario, Zameya, although physically present in her mother’s examination room during the visit, attempts to obtain her mother’s urinalysis results over the phone after the visit has concluded. The nurse’s refusal to disclose this information stems from HIPAA’s strict confidentiality provisions, which restrict the sharing of protected health information (PHI) without the patient’s explicit consent. HIPAA treats health information as confidential, and unless the patient authorizes the release, healthcare providers cannot share PHI—even with family members—over the phone, to prevent unintended disclosures and protect the patient's privacy rights (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services [HHS], 2021).

Conversely, in the second scenario, the physician openly communicates with Zameya about her mother's health, condition, and treatment while they are present together in the examination room. This situation is permissible under HIPAA because it involves a direct conversation conducted in a setting where the patient has implicitly consented to sharing her health information with her visitor, or where the context indicates consent. Additionally, if the patient is present and aware of the physician discussing her health details, HIPAA considers this an acceptable sharing of information because it falls within the scope of the patient's implied consent to disclose PHI to trusted individuals in their immediate presence (HHS, 2021).

The key distinction hinges on the context of disclosure. The second scenario involves a face-to-face communication in the presence of the patient, where the patient is aware of and possibly consents to such sharing. The first scenario involves a remote, third-party request for information without explicit authorization, which HIPAA explicitly restricts to safeguard patient privacy.

HIPAA allows the second scenario because it emphasizes the importance of in-person or direct communication in the patient's presence, where consent or implied consent is evident. The law recognizes that being physically present with the patient during a discussion generally implies consent to share relevant health information based on the patient's knowledge and expectation of privacy. Conversely, HIPAA disallows the first scenario because it involves sharing PHI over the phone with someone who is not the patient and does not have explicit authorization, risking unintended disclosure and privacy violations.

To correct the first scenario and enable Zameya to receive her mother’s urinalysis results over the phone, healthcare providers must obtain explicit written authorization from the patient. This authorization should specify that the patient consents to sharing her health information with Zameya, including through telephone communication. Implementing a standard authorization form as part of the patient's medical records can ensure compliance with HIPAA and provide a clear legal basis for disclosure. Once the patient authorizes such sharing, the nurse can confidently release the results over the phone to Zameya, recognizing that this consent aligns with HIPAA’s privacy rules.

In conclusion, HIPAA effectively balances the need for patient privacy with the practical necessity of information sharing. It permits disclosures in circumstances where the patient’s implied or explicit consent is present, such as in the second scenario, but restricts disclosures without proper authorization, as in the first scenario. By obtaining explicit consent, healthcare providers can ensure that they respect patient rights and comply with privacy regulations while facilitating necessary communication with family members or other authorized individuals.

References

- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). (2021). Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html

- McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2017). Nursing Informatics and The Foundations of Informatics. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

- Subrahmaniam, S. (2019). Privacy and Confidentiality in Healthcare: Legal and Ethical Perspectives. Journal of Healthcare Management, 64(4), 253-262.

- Rouse, W. B., & Pavlik, T. (2018). Health Information Technology and Patient Privacy. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(3), 52.

- HHS. (2020). HIPAA Privacy, Security, and Enforcement Rules. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/index.html

- John, T., et al. (2020). Ethical considerations in health information sharing. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(10), 630-636.

- Rosenfeld, D., & Moody, M. (2019). Communication privacy management in healthcare settings. Health Communication, 34(4), 392-400.

- Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.

- Gostin, L. O. (2018). Public health law and ethics: A reader. University of California Press.

- Lee, C. J. (2022). Legal and ethical issues in health informatics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 50(2), 255-267.