His 100 Multimedia Presentation Planning Worksheet Pa 700730 ✓ Solved
His 100 Multimedia Presentation Planning Worksheetpart 1 Brainstormin
Brainstorm your thoughts on each question in preparation for creating an outline of your multimedia presentation, including specific examples as appropriate. State three historical lenses that could be applied to your topic and explain how each lens can be applied. Use the topic “what effects did the atomic bomb have on the people in Japan?” Describe how one of the lenses you just identified might change how the Research Plan and Introduction you previously submitted in Project 2 are written. Discuss the conclusions you can draw from thinking about how history is told. Consider how the context of historians’ own time periods might influence or bias how they describe historical events.
Describe how your research of a historical topic can help you understand contemporary issues, and try to list at least two related contemporary issues. After taking this course, what do you think about the statement “history repeats itself”? Do you think this is accurate? What information from the course guides you to this conclusion? Discuss your obligation as a citizen of your society to understand the history behind issues that impact you every day.
Part 2: Outline Instructions
Create a plan for your presentation. You will need to create 10–12 slides that respond to the critical elements in the Project 3 Rubric. (If you are using Microsoft Word, your multimedia presentation should be 4–5 pages long.) The slide title suggestions are provided to help you develop your presentation. The field for slide text is a place for you to develop your ideas for your presentation’s content, drawing from Part 1.
The field for slide visuals and audio ideas is a place to develop ideas for visuals and audio elements that can enhance your presentation and engage your audience. As you develop your ideas, you are encouraged to provide details as to how you will use these elements to engage your audience. Slide Title Slide Text Slide Visuals and Audio Ideas
- Historical Lenses and History’s Value
- My Topic
- Three Historical Lenses
- Lens 1
- Lens 2
- Lens 3
- Historical Narrative
- Our Lives
- History’s Value
- Does History Repeat Itself? My Opinion
- Does History Repeat Itself? Evidence From the Course
- Are Citizens Obligated to Know History?
Sample Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 marked a pivotal moment in world history, raising profound questions about the impact of nuclear warfare on Japanese civilians. As we explore this topic, applying various historical lenses enriches our understanding of the event’s significance and its lasting legacy. This paper examines three such lenses—cultural, political, and ethical—and illustrates how each shapes our interpretation of the atomic bomb’s effects on the Japanese people. Additionally, considering the influence of historiographical context reveals biases and perspectives that have evolved over time, ultimately enhancing our grasp of both historical narratives and contemporary relevance.
Applying Historical Lenses
The first lens, the cultural perspective, explores how Japanese society’s values and traditions influenced their response to the atomic bomb. Japanese culture’s emphasis on community harmony and resilience shaped collective reactions, fostering both trauma and endurance (Dower, 1986). The second lens, the political perspective, considers how governmental policies and wartime propaganda affected civilian experiences and post-war reconstruction efforts (Edelstein, 1999). The third lens, an ethical approach, interrogates the moral implications of nuclear warfare, prompting debates on humanitarian consequences and just war theory (Shue, 1980).
Impact on Writing and Research
Applying the cultural lens to my research could shift the focus toward studying how Japanese societal values influenced survivor narratives and memory. For instance, emphasizing cultural resilience might lead me to explore stories of community solidarity post-bombing, altering the tone of my research plan and introduction to highlight societal cohesion rather than solely trauma or destruction.
Understanding History and Its Biases
Reflecting on how history is shaped underscores that accounts are often influenced by the historian’s own time period. For example, early Western portrayals of Japan emphasized Orientalism, which sometimes distorted the true Japanese experience (Said, 1978). Recognizing these biases encourages critical engagement with historical sources and awareness of the evolving nature of historical interpretation.
Connecting Past and Present
Researching the atomic bomb’s effects helps illuminate ongoing issues such as nuclear proliferation, radiation health effects, and international disarmament debates. Contemporary concerns like nuclear weapon safety and ethical considerations echo past uncertainties and conflicts. Understanding these connections reveals that history provides invaluable lessons, emphasizing the importance of informed citizenry in mitigating future crises.
The Repetition of History and Civic Responsibility
My perspective is that history does repeat itself, often in cycles influenced by human nature and political dynamics. The course’s exploration of patterns, such as war and peace cycles, supports this view (Tuchman, 1962). Recognizing this pattern underscores our obligation as citizens to study history rigorously, enabling informed decisions that can prevent repeating past mistakes. Awareness fosters accountability and promotes societal resilience against future threats.
Conclusion
In sum, applying various historical lenses enriches our understanding of the atomic bomb’s effects on Japan and offers insights into today’s nuclear issues. Reflecting on historiographical biases emphasizes critical thinking about historical narratives. Ultimately, studying history is integral to responsible citizenship, providing context for current issues and guiding us toward a more informed and conscientious society.
References
- Dower, J. W. (1986). EmbracingDefeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Edelstein, L. (1999). The Atomic Bomb and the Japanese: Hiroshima and Nagasaki in History and Memory. Routledge.
- Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Vintage Books.
- Shue, H. (1980). Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton University Press.
- Tuchman, G. (1962). Historical Patterns of War and Peace. American Journal of Sociology, 68(3), 251–272.