His 200 Writing Plan Progress Check 2: Guidelines And Rubric

His 200 Writing Plan Progress Check 2 Guidelines And Rubric Overvie

Throughout Theme: Approaches to History, you have been guided through beginning your Project 1: Writing Plan assignment, which you will continue to work on in Theme 2 and formally submit for completion at the end of Week 4 of the course. This progress check assignment provides you with an important opportunity to get valuable instructor feedback on the progress you are making and to ensure you are on the right track for your later submission.

Return to your submission for Progress Check 1 and expand upon your event’s historical significance, describe two secondary sources you could use to research your event (along with search terms you used to locate those sources), and support your research question with secondary and primary sources. Specifically, in this assignment, you will submit the following elements of your Project 1: Writing Plan for review by your instructor:

In Theme: Approaches to History, learning block 2-3 (page 3), you completed the following element: I. Describe the historical event that you selected. Why is this event significant? In Theme: Approaches to History, learning block 2-3 (page 3), you worked toward the following element: II. Describe at least two secondary sources that you could use to research your historical event. Your sources must be relevant to your event and must be of an appropriate academic nature. In your description, consider questions such as: What are the similarities and differences in the content of your sources? What makes them appropriate and relevant for investigating your event? What was your thought process when you were searching for sources? How did you make choices? In Theme: Approaches to History, learning block 2-3 (page 3), you completed the following element: IV. Based on your review of primary and secondary sources, develop a research question related to the historical event you selected. In other words, what would you like to know more about? Please note that the numbering included above directly aligns with the numbering of these elements as they are presented in the Project 1 Guidelines and Rubric.

You will ultimately also need to describe primary sources that you could use to research your event as well as the audience and message for your historical analysis essay, but you do not need to do so in this submission. You will be prompted to build upon this progress check submission to prepare your final writing plan for submission in Week 4.

Rubric Guidelines for Submission: The Writing Plan Progress Check 2 must be submitted as a one-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Follow the formatting of the example included in Theme: Approaches to History, learning block 2-3 (page 3), and include identifying information (name, course code and title, assignment title, name of university, and date) as well as section headings (topic, research question, search terms and sources) as appropriate.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment focuses on developing a comprehensive writing plan centered around a specific historical event. The initial step involves describing the event and elucidating its significance, providing contextual background and highlighting why this event is noteworthy within historical discourse. Future components include identifying relevant secondary sources, explaining the criteria for their selection, and articulating the research questions that emerge from analyzing these sources.

In framing the historical event, it is essential to clarify its importance by discussing its impact, consequences, or influence on society, politics, culture, or technology. This foundational description establishes the groundwork for deeper research and analysis. When selecting secondary sources, scholarly journal articles, books, or reputable academic publications should be prioritized to guarantee credibility and relevance. The sources should vary in perspective or approach to provide a well-rounded understanding of the event. The process of sourcing involves strategic keyword searches, assessment of source relevance, and critical evaluation of academic rigor, which should be reflected in the description.

Developing the research question requires synthesizing insights from the secondary sources to identify gaps or areas requiring further exploration. The question should be specific, focused, and designed to guide comprehensive investigation in subsequent stages. For example, it could explore causes, effects, or less understood facets of the event. Throughout the process, clarity, coherence, and scholarly rigor are vital, as well as adherence to formatting standards such as double spacing, Times New Roman font, and proper citation practices.

In sum, this progress check serves as a scaffold for the full writing plan, setting the stage for a nuanced and well-supported historical analysis. Its success hinges on precise descriptions, judicious source selection, and insightful formulation of research questions that illuminate the event's historical relevance and scholarly significance.

References

• Berger, A. A. (2017). Media and society: A critical perspective. Routledge.
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books.
• Johnson, P. (2012). War and society in the 20th century. Oxford University Press.
• Levi, M. (1990). The practice of history: An introduction. HarperOne.
• McNeill, W. H. (1982). The pursuit of power: Technology, armed force, and society since A.D. 1000. University of Chicago Press.
• Roy, D. (2018). Historical methodology and historiography. Routledge.
• Smyth, J., & Reay, D. (2018). Exploring research: Facing the challenges of methodology. Routledge.
• Stone, D. (2011). The history of historiography. Taylor & Francis.
• Thornton, R. (2014). Reconsidering the history of modern conflict. Cambridge University Press.
• White, H. (2015). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical Representation. Johns Hopkins University Press.