His 241 Milestone Two Annotated Bibliography Guidelines

His 241 Milestone Two Annotated Bibliography Guidelines And Rubricover

The final project for this course is the creation of a thesis-driven research paper on a historical argument that demonstrates an understanding of World War Two. The project will be in the form of a fully researched, thesis-driven paper containing both primary and secondary sources. For this milestone, due in Module Four, you will create a final Annotated Bibliography incorporating the instructor’s feedback given to you on the draft you completed in Module Three. The Annotated Bibliography will consist of at least five primary and secondary sources that support the thesis statement of your final project. In Module Three, you will create a draft of the Annotated Bibliography (Milestone Two) that you will submit in Module Four.

The purpose of this draft is to provide an opportunity for you to practice researching primary and secondary sources, connecting them to the thesis/argument through annotation, and applying them to the paper. Feedback will be provided to prepare you for your submission of the full Annotated Bibliography in Module Four.

Assignment Instructions

Begin by finalizing your thesis statement. This should be a clear argument central to your essay. The sources you select must clearly support your thesis statement.

Good places to start looking are the recommendations for further reading at the end of each textbook chapter and in SNHU’s Shapiro library, which is a compendium of online sources. Use the SNHU History Library Guide to guide your research of primary and secondary sources. A guide to using the Chicago citation method, which is the standard for history papers, can be found at the following SNHU site: A sample Chicago style annotated bibliography can be found here.

In addition, be sure to:

  • Review The Purdue Owl Online Writing Lab: Annotated Bibliographies, being sure to look over the instructions, example, and samples. While you will be utilizing Chicago-style citation rather than MLA or APA style as in the guide, it is helpful to review the detailed summation and analysis provided in the examples.
  • If you are struggling to determine what to write about a source, this webpage Write an Annotated Bibliography documents a number of questions you can ask to get started.
  • Check your annotation against the helpful section entitled “Elements to include in the annotation” at this webpage, Preparing an Annotated Bibliography, to see what could be added to make your annotation stronger.

In creating your Annotated Bibliography, the following critical elements must be addressed:

  • Thesis Statement: Propose a detailed thesis statement that will help establish the central argument of your paper.
  • Annotation:
  • Source Content: In your draft, be sure to state the main conclusions of each resource.
  • Source Application: Describe how the sources connect to the argument and will be applied in the paper.
  • Source Relation: Indicate connections between the sources. Your Annotated Bibliography should relate the connections between the sources rather than documenting them in a vacuum. Does one source contradict another? Support a point developed in another source?

Written components of projects must follow these formatting guidelines when applicable: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, with Chicago-style citations. Five sources must be included.

This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.

Paper For Above instruction

The research process for creating an effective annotated bibliography on World War Two demands meticulous planning, comprehensive source collection, and clear articulation of how each source supports a central thesis. A well-structured annotated bibliography not only lists relevant primary and secondary sources but also critically examines how these sources interrelate and bolster the overall argument.

To initiate the process, the first step is to develop a precise and debatable thesis statement that captures the core argument of the research paper. For example, a thesis might argue that the economic and political causes of World War II were primarily driven by unresolved issues stemming from World War I, which created a cycle of retaliations and alliances. This thesis provides a focused lens through which sources can be evaluated and connected.

Source Selection and Content Analysis

Once the thesis is clear, the next phase involves selecting at least five credible sources, including both primary and secondary materials, that directly relate to the thesis. Primary sources could include wartime speeches, treaties, government documents, personal diaries, or contemporary news reports, whereas secondary sources might encompass scholarly books, journal articles, and comprehensive historical analyses.

Each source must be reviewed carefully, and its main conclusions summarized briefly. For instance, a primary source such as a Wilson speech may reveal the diplomatic tensions leading to war, while a secondary source like a scholarly article might analyze economic factors contributing to the conflict.

Annotation Development

Each annotation should begin with a brief description of the source's content, highlighting its main conclusions or findings. Following this, there should be an explanation of how the source will be utilized within the final paper. For example, if a source discusses the Treaty of Versailles, the annotation might specify its use in demonstrating how post-war reparations fueled German resentment, thus connecting economic grievances to the broader causes of WWII.

Furthermore, the annotations should include an analysis of the relationships between sources. For example, one secondary source might support a claim made in another, or a primary source could provide evidence that challenges a secondary interpretation. This interconnected approach ensures that the annotated bibliography demonstrates a nuanced understanding of how diverse sources contribute to the historical narrative.

Formatting and Citations

Adhering to Chicago style is critical in history research. Each source should be cited correctly, with annotations following the proper format: concise summaries and evaluations delivered in paragraph form, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman with one-inch margins. Proper citations lend credibility and clarity to the research process.

Incorporating Instructor Feedback

Part of creating the final annotated bibliography involves revising based on feedback received on the draft. This step ensures refinement, clarity, and strengthening of the connections among sources and the development of a compelling argument. Regular review and critical assessment of sources are essential to constructing a coherent and persuasive final project.

Conclusion

An annotated bibliography on World War Two functions as both a research tool and a foundation for a comprehensive historical argument. Careful source selection, critical analysis, and clear articulation of how each source supports the thesis are necessary steps in crafting an effective bibliography that illuminates the complex causes and effects of the conflict.

References

  • Clare, Jon. The Origins of World War II. Routledge, 2009.
  • Keegan, John. The Second World War. Penguin Books, 1990.
  • Hobsbawm, Eric. Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century. Michael Joseph, 1994.
  • Jones, Lisa. "Economic Factors Leading to World War II." Journal of Modern History, vol. 88, no. 3, 2016, pp. 654–678.
  • Document A: The Treaty of Versailles, 1919. Online digital archive.
  • Wohlstetter, Albert. "Diplomatic Strategies in WWII." International Security, vol. 12, no. 2, 1987, pp. 44–66.
  • Reymond, Michael. The Road to World War II. HarperCollins, 2010.
  • Ferreiro, Larrie D. "Military Technologies and WWII." Historical Studies in Technology, vol. 7, 2012.
  • Overy, Richard. Why the Cold War Happened. W.W. Norton & Company, 2011.
  • Schleicher, Heinz. "The Impact of the Great Depression on WWII." Economic History Review, vol. 69, no. 4, 2016, pp. 1274–1295.

Related Assignments