Hiu Did Homework For Me Last Week; Please I Need This Homewo
Hiu Did A Homework For Me Last Weekplease I Need This Hw To Be Done Wi
Hiu Did A Homework For Me Last Weekplease I Need This Hw To Be Done Wi
Hi U did a homework for me last week Please i need this hw to be done within 2 hours Please write the question followed by your answer
1. Would you like to work for a large firm or a small business? Private or public? In an office or out in the field? Give your reasons for each answer.
2. What kind of leader would you be? Do you have evidence to show that?
3. Do you see any problems with a participative (democratic) leadership style? Can you see a manager getting frustrated when he or she can’t control others?
4. Can someone who’s trained to give orders (like a military sergeant) be retrained to be a participative leader? How? What problems may emerge?
Paper For Above instruction
Choosing between working in a large firm or a small business involves weighing several advantages and disadvantages. Large firms often offer stability, extensive resources, and structured career progression, providing employees with security and opportunities for advancement. Conversely, small businesses usually allow for greater flexibility, closer team relationships, and a broader scope of responsibilities, which can foster a more dynamic and personal work environment. The decision between private and public sectors depends on individual preferences: the private sector often offers higher salaries, innovation, and fast-paced environments, while the public sector tends to provide job security, pension benefits, and a focus on community service. Regarding the physical work environment, working in an office is typically suited for roles involving administrative tasks, meetings, or computer work, emphasizing comfort and collaboration. Fieldwork, on the other hand, is essential for roles requiring direct interaction with clients or physical activity, such as in construction, inspection, or environmental assessment.
When considering the type of leadership I would embody, I resonate more with a transformational or participative style. Evidence of this can be seen in my tendency to encourage collaboration, value team input, and motivate others towards shared goals. For instance, in academic projects or team sports, I often involve my peers in decision-making and inspire collective effort, which demonstrates my leadership inclination. However, leadership styles should adapt to circumstances. For example, in crisis situations, a more authoritative approach might be necessary, whereas in routine operations, a participative style can foster innovation and morale.
The participative or democratic leadership style offers several benefits, including increased team motivation, improved decision quality, and enhanced creativity. Nevertheless, it can pose challenges, such as potential delays in decision-making due to the need for consensus or disagreements among team members. Additionally, there is the risk of decision paralysis if the team cannot reach agreements promptly. A manager who heavily relies on participative approaches might become frustrated if team members do not provide timely input or if the decision-making process becomes too slow for urgent matters. The ability to balance democratic principles with authoritative decision-making is crucial for effective leadership.
Re-training a military or authoritarian trainer to adopt a participative leadership approach is feasible but challenging. The key steps involve fostering emotional intelligence, developing active listening skills, and encouraging empathy and collaboration. These leaders must learn to delegate authority appropriately and trust the judgment of their team, which may be difficult given their training to command and control. Potential problems include resistance from the leader, as it may conflict with ingrained habits of control and discipline, and initial mistrust from team members unaccustomed to shared decision-making. Transitioning from an order-giving role to a participative leader requires patience, ongoing training, and a cultural shift within the organization to value collective input.
In conclusion, leadership styles and work environment preferences significantly influence individual career satisfaction and effectiveness. Embracing flexible leadership approaches and understanding the dynamics of various organizational settings can enhance personal growth and organizational success. Whether working in large or small firms, private or public sectors, or adopting different leadership styles, adapting to the context and cultivating important skills are essential for professional development and leadership excellence.
References
Bass, B. M. (1990). Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. Free Press.
Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
Yukl, G. A. (2012). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in child-treatment programs. Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 269-299.
Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and Decision-Making. University of Pittsburgh Press.
George, B. (2003). Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value. Jossey-Bass.
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work, motivation, and personality. World Publishing Company.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The Leadership Challenge (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Sadler-Smith, E. (2016). Imposter feelings among entrepreneurs: Uncertainty and the entrepreneurial self. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(6), 930-952.