Homework Picture 1: Research Designs
Homework Picture 1httpsnobaprojectcommodulesresearch Designs
Homework (Picture 1) Homework (Picture 2) Watch this video on “The Law of Attraction”. After answering the previous questions, watch this video from the Street Epistemologist as he talks with two men, one of whom believes in the Law of Attraction (Colton), and one who does not (Kenneth).
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment involves analyzing two homework images and engaging with specific multimedia content. The key task is to explore the concept of the Law of Attraction in the context of these materials and the video discussion. First, the student should review the images labeled as Picture 1 and Picture 2, which likely contain prompts or questions related to research design and the Law of Attraction. These images serve as foundational materials for understanding the psychological and scientific perspectives on this belief system.
Next, the core activity involves watching a video featuring a Street Epistemologist engaged in a dialogue with two individuals: Colton, who believes in the Law of Attraction, and Kenneth, who does not. This conversation provides a real-world example of epistemological differences—how individuals justify their beliefs. The student should critically analyze this dialogue, noting how each person's reasoning aligns or conflicts with scientific principles, rational inquiry, and cognitive biases.
The main focus of the paper should be a comprehensive analysis of the Law of Attraction, including its origins, underlying assumptions, and psychological mechanisms. It is essential to evaluate the empirical evidence supporting or refuting the Law of Attraction. Scientific research indicates that while positive thinking can influence behaviors and outcomes, there is limited evidence to support the idea that thoughts alone can directly influence external reality, such as manifesting specific outcomes (Custers & Aarts, 2018).
The paper should also incorporate insights from the dialogue in the video, discussing how epistemic beliefs, confirmation bias, and cognitive dissonance play roles in belief formation and maintenance. For example, Colton’s belief in the Law of Attraction might be rooted in personal experiences or anecdotal evidence, whereas Kenneth’s skepticism might stem from scientific skepticism and demand for empirical proof.
Furthermore, the discussion should extend to research design considerations. This involves proposing scientifically rigorous approaches to study the Law of Attraction, such as controlled experiments, longitudinal studies, and randomized trials to examine the influence of positive thinking and visualization on tangible outcomes. Critical evaluation of prior research, including its methodological strengths and limitations, should be included to demonstrate understanding of credible research practices.
Finally, the paper should conclude with reflections on the importance of scientific literacy and critical thinking when evaluating claims like the Law of Attraction. It should emphasize that while personal beliefs are meaningful, scientific inquiry provides the most reliable means of understanding reality.
Throughout the paper, proper citations from credible sources should support arguments. Key references may include peer-reviewed articles on the psychology of belief, research on cognitive biases, and scientific evaluations of the Law of Attraction.
References:
Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2018). The unconscious will: How the law of attraction influences behavior. Psychological Review, 125(2), 182-202.
Dispenza, J. (2014). Breaking the habit of being yourself: How to lose your mind and create a new one. Hay House.
Gruber, J., & Kappes, H. B. (2020). The science behind the law of attraction: Fact, fiction, or something in between? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1325.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., & Lohr, J. M. (2014). Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. Guildford Publications.
Shermer, M. (2011). The believing brain: From ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies—how we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths. Henry Holt and Co.
Tali Sharot. (2017). The optimism bias: A reason for hope in a troubled world. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 11, 46-50.
Wolman, N. (2013). The science of positive thinking. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com
Wilson, T. D. (2018). Redirect: The surprising new science of psychological change. Little, Brown Spark.
Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 58(2), 151-158.