How Can Common Size Statements Be Useful For Comparison

How Can Common Size Statements Be Useful For Comparison Purposes T

Common size financial statements are essential analytical tools that express each line item as a percentage of a base figure, such as total assets or total sales. This standardization allows for meaningful comparisons across different companies, industries, or time periods, regardless of size differences or scale. Specifically, by converting financial data into percentages, analysts and stakeholders can easily identify relative strengths and weaknesses within the financial structure of an organization, facilitating effective evaluation and benchmarking.

For example, when comparing two companies in the retail sector, a common size balance sheet allows investors to observe the proportion of assets financed by liabilities versus equity. Similarly, a common size income statement reveals the percentage of sales consumed by various expenses, such as cost of goods sold or administrative expenses. These comparisons can highlight operational efficiencies or areas needing improvement. If Company A has a significantly higher percentage of its sales dedicated to marketing expenses compared to Company B, it may suggest either a more aggressive growth strategy or inefficiencies in marketing expenditure.

Companies can leverage common size statements to improve their internal performance by identifying areas where they are overspending or underperforming relative to peers. For instance, if a company's selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) constitute a higher percentage of sales than industry averages, management can investigate cost-control measures. Furthermore, these statements support trend analysis over multiple periods, enabling firms to track progress and implement strategic adjustments.

An illustrative example is Amazon’s operational analysis. By analyzing Amazon’s common size income statement over recent years, one can observe how its marketing and technology expenses relate to sales. Despite growing expenses, Amazon’s consistent sales growth and relatively stable expense ratios suggest efficiencies in scaling operations. This comparison helps investors understand the company’s competitive positioning and cost management effectiveness.

Why Are a Company’s Credit Policy and Accounts Receivable Management So Important?

A company’s credit policy and accounts receivable management are fundamental to maintaining healthy cash flow and financial stability. A robust credit policy delineates clear credit terms, credit limits, and collection procedures, reducing the risk of late payments or defaults. Effective accounts receivable management ensures timely collection of funds, minimizes bad debt, and optimizes working capital utilization.

Failing to manage credit policies and receivables properly can lead to significant repercussions. Poor management often results in increased days sales outstanding (DSO), cash flow shortages, and ultimately, difficulties in meeting financial obligations. Companies may face insolvency, deteriorating creditworthiness, and higher borrowing costs if their receivables remain unpaid and liquidity diminishes.

An example of the consequences of inadequate receivables management is the case of Enron. While primarily known for accounting fraud, Enron’s aggressive credit practices and minimal oversight contributed to its financial downfall. The company’s lax credit policy and poor receivables management led to overextension and recognition of fictitious profits, which collapsed when the underlying issues surfaced, contributing to its bankruptcy. This highlights the importance of diligent receivables management in safeguarding company health.

In another example, Borders Books struggled with credit management in the early 2010s. Its slow collection on receivables, coupled with underperforming sales, constrained cash flow and delayed inventory replenishment. These financial strains eventually led to the company’s bankruptcy filing in 2011. Had Borders implemented stricter credit policies and improved receivables collection, it might have mitigated some of these financial pressures.

In summary, both common size statements and effective credit and receivables management are vital tools for financial analysis and operational success. They enable companies to benchmark performance, identify inefficiencies, and maintain liquidity, which are essential for long-term sustainability and growth.

References

• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning.
• Gibson, C. H. (2018). Financial Reporting & Analysis. Cengage Learning.
• Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2013). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Wild, J. J., Subramanyam, K. R., & Halsey, R. F. (2014). Financial Statement Analysis. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management. Cengage Learning.
• Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Wiley Finance.
• Foster, G. (2013). Financial Statement Analysis. Pearson.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Powell, R. G., & Baker, G. A. (2014). Management Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.