How Companies Develop Distinctive Competencies And How Compe

How Companies Develop Distinctive Competencies And How Competencies

Explain how companies develop distinctive competencies and how these competencies lead to a competitive advantage. Discuss how these competencies help a company position itself in the market. Describe why companies choose outsourcing and how outsourcing impacts value chain activities. Explain the use of value chain activities in outsourcing or offshoring and how outsourcing contributes to developing competitive advantage. Explore why companies diversify and how key success factors (KSFs) influence decision-making in diversification. Identify the types of assets a company must possess for successful diversification. Analyze the advantages offered by the global market to companies and examine various strategies multinational corporations use to participate in the global market. Discuss which strategy best fits the company's goals and purposes. Define global drivers and their relationship to economies of scale, and how economies of scale can be achieved. Describe the different entry modes in the global market, considering political risk factors, and identify which entry mode best minimizes political risk. Explain how companies select their entry modes in the global marketplace.

Paper For Above instruction

Developing distinctive competencies is fundamental to a firm's long-term success and competitive advantage. These competencies are the unique bundle of skills, resources, and capabilities that an organization develops over time through learning, innovation, and strategic investments. According to Barney (1991), a core competency must be valuable, rare, difficult to imitate, and non-substitutable. Firms achieve these competencies through continuous improvement, leveraging proprietary knowledge, and effectively managing resources, which enables them to differentiate their offerings and outperform competitors. This differentiation translates into a sustained competitive advantage, allowing firms to secure a stronger market position and customer loyalty.

Distinctive competencies help companies position themselves in the market by establishing unique value propositions that resonate with target customers. For example, Apple's innovation in product design and user experience differentiates it from competitors, enabling it to command premium prices. Effective positioning also involves aligning competencies with market needs, leveraging branding, and creating barriers to entry for competitors. These competencies serve as a basis for strategic planning and market segmentation, reinforcing the company's competitive stance.

Outsourcing is a strategic decision companies make to focus on their core competencies while delegating non-core activities to specialized external providers. This approach impacts the value chain by allowing firms to reconfigure activities such as manufacturing, customer service, or logistics, often at lower costs or with higher quality. For example, many technology firms outsource manufacturing to countries with lower production costs, enabling cost advantages and flexibility.

In the context of the value chain, outsourcing or offshoring involves transferring specific activities to external suppliers or relocating units across borders. This not only reduces costs but also enhances the firm's strategic agility. Outsourcing contributes to developing competitive advantage by enabling companies to access specialized skills, technologies, and innovation capabilities that they may lack internally. This allows for a focus on activities that deliver the highest value and bolster differentiation in the marketplace.

Diversification is driven by the desire to spread risk, capitalize on new market opportunities, and leverage existing assets. According to the Ansoff Matrix, companies diversify to enter new markets or develop new products, which can stabilize revenues and enhance growth prospects. Key success factors (KSFs) such as financial strength, managerial expertise, and resource availability influence diversification decisions, ensuring that the company possesses the necessary assets and capabilities.

For successful diversification, a firm must have a robust financial position to fund new ventures, adaptable organizational structures, and the managerial expertise to manage diverse operations. Assets like technological know-how, brand reputation, and operational efficiencies are critical for entering new sectors or geographical markets.

The global market offers several advantages such as access to larger customer bases, increased revenue potential, diversification of market risk, cost efficiencies through economies of scale, and access to global talent and resources. Multinational corporations employ various strategies to compete effectively on a global scale, including global standardization, localization, transnational, and multidomestic strategies.

The choice of strategy depends on the company's objectives, industry characteristics, and market conditions. For instance, a company seeking cost leadership might prefer a global standardization strategy to exploit economies of scale, whereas a company aiming to meet local preferences may adopt a localization approach. The strategy that best fits the company's overall goals is one that balances efficiency and adaptability, aligning with its competitive position and growth ambitions.

Global drivers such as technological advancements, deregulation, and increased trade liberalization facilitate international expansion. These drivers contribute to economies of scale by enabling larger production volumes, reducing per-unit costs, and improving competitive positioning. Economies of scale are achieved through increased production levels that spread fixed costs over additional units, optimize supply chain efficiencies, and leverage shared resources.

Entry modes into the global market include export, licensing, franchising, joint ventures, wholly owned subsidiaries, and strategic alliances. Each mode involves a different level of commitment, risk, control, and resource investment. Political risk considerations are paramount; joint ventures or strategic alliances often serve as a way to mitigate political risks by sharing ownership and control with local partners familiar with the regulatory environment.

Choosing an entry mode involves evaluating the political stability, legal environment, and economic conditions of the host country. When political risk is high, partnership-based entry modes like joint ventures or licensing are preferred as they provide local insight and shared risk. Conversely, wholly owned subsidiaries offer greater control but entail higher risk exposure. Companies typically conduct comprehensive risk assessments and align their entry strategies with their risk appetite, resource availability, and long-term objectives.

References

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  • Hill, C., & Hult, G. (2019). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
  • Contractor, F. J. (2010). The growing importance of international business: Strategic considerations for multinational firms. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 1-10.
  • Ghemawat, P. (2007). Redefining Global Strategy: Crossing Borders in a World Where Differences Still Matter. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Lu, V. (2020). Global Strategy and Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 567-583.
  • Peng, M. W. (2017). Global Strategy (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Yip, G. S. (1989). Global Strategy...In a World of Nations? Sloan Management Review, 31(1), 29-41.
  • Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2008). Different Approaches to Analyzing Multinational Enterprises. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25(2), 134-147.
  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The Internationalization Process of the Firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.