How Ethics Differ In Research And Therapeutic Practice

How Ethics Differ In Research And Therapeutic Practiceprior To Beginni

Explain the differences between the ethical standards for clients being treated by psychologists in counseling sessions and the standards for conducting psychological research with human participants. Consider your future career in the field of psychology and describe the parts of the Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct you expect to relate directly to your future career. Select and provide the number for one ethical requirement that applies specifically to psychological research and briefly summarize the standard. Explain why this requirement may not apply to a therapy situation.

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical standards that guide psychologists in therapeutic practice and research are fundamentally designed to protect the well-being, rights, and dignity of individuals involved. Although these standards share common principles, their application differs distinctly within the contexts of therapy and research. This essay explores these differences, emphasizing specific standards relevant to each domain, and discusses an ethical requirement that applies specifically to research, with a reflection on its relevance—or lack thereof—to therapeutic settings.

Differences Between Ethical Standards in Therapeutic Practice and Research

In therapeutic practice, psychologists are primarily guided by standards that emphasize beneficence, nonmaleficence, confidentiality, and the therapeutic relationship's integrity. The American Psychological Association's (APA) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (2021) delineates standards such as Standard 4 on Privacy and Confidentiality and Standard 10 on Therapy. These standards underscore the importance of protecting client privacy, maintaining confidentiality, and establishing informed consent (APA, 2021). The therapist's obligation is to foster a safe environment where clients can explore personal issues without fear of judgment or breach of confidentiality.

By contrast, ethical standards in research focus on safeguarding the rights of participants, ensuring informed consent, minimizing risk, and conducting research with integrity. Standard 8 of the APA Code centers on Research and Publication, detailing obligations for honest data collection, analysis, and reporting, as well as the necessity of Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval to oversee research protocols (APA, 2021). The primary goal is to avoid harm, ensure voluntary participation, and promote scientific validity.

While both domains prioritize beneficence and respect for persons, the application varies. Therapeutic standards are primarily concerned with the ongoing well-being of individual clients, emphasizing confidentiality and informed consent within the context of a service relationship. In research, safeguarding participant welfare involves rigorous oversight, transparency, and adherence to protocols that prevent exploitation and harm, particularly when research involves vulnerable populations or sensitive topics.

Furthermore, the standards addressing dual relationships, competence, and informed consent are critical in both contexts but adapted differently. Therapists must navigate maintaining professional boundaries to ensure the therapeutic alliance remains ethical (Standard 10.04), whereas researchers must rigorously obtain voluntary, informed consent and clarify participants' rights under research protocols (Standard 8.02).

Ethical Standard Specific to Research

A pertinent ethical requirement for research is Standard 8.02, which states that psychologists must obtain informed consent from research participants. This involves providing clear information about the nature of the study, potential risks, benefits, and the voluntary nature of participation. Researchers are also obliged to ensure that participants understand they can withdraw at any time without penalty (APA, 2021).

This standard is vital for preserving autonomy and ensuring voluntary participation, aligning closely with the ethical principle of respect for persons. It helps safeguard against coercion and ensures that participants make informed decisions about their involvement.

However, this requirement may not directly apply to therapy situations because therapeutic relationships inherently involve ongoing, dynamic interactions tailored to individual clients' needs. While informed consent remains vital, it is often embedded within broader therapeutic agreements and disclosures. Unlike research participation, where consent is obtained before engaging in a specific activity, therapy involves continuous consent and negotiation based on the client’s evolving capacity, understanding, and comfort level. Additionally, therapeutic relationships may involve sensitive disclosures where the boundaries of consent are more fluid, making the concept of ongoing, explicit consent more complex than in research protocols.

In conclusion, the ethical standards guiding psychologists differ between research and therapy mainly in scope, application, and oversight procedures. Research standards emphasize transparency, minimizing risk, and protecting participant rights through mechanisms like IRB review and informed consent, whereas therapeutic standards focus on confidentiality, client welfare, and the therapeutic alliance. Recognizing these differences ensures that psychologists uphold ethical integrity tailored appropriately to each professional context and safeguards the rights and well-being of individuals involved.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2021). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (2011). Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions. Cengage Learning.
• Fisher, C. B. (2017). Decoding the Ethics Code: A Practical Guide for Psychologists. Sage Publications.
• American Psychological Association. (2022). Guidelines for Ethical Research. APA Website.
• Resnik, D. B. (2020). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects. Springer.
• Sieber, J. E. (2012). The Ethics of Social Research: Fieldwork, Regulation, and Publication. Springer.
• Shields, L. (2020). Ethical Dilemmas in Clinical Practice and Research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(3), 487-495.
• Wendler, D., et al. (2017). Assent and Consent in Pediatric Research: Ethical and Practical Dimensions. Pediatrics, 139(4), e20161211.
• Yeo, M., et al. (2019). Research Ethics: Cases and Materials. Routledge.