How Reinforcement Schedules Work In Operant Conditioning ✓ Solved

How Reinforcement Schedules Work Operant conditioning is a

Operant conditioning is a learning process in which new behaviors are acquired and modified through their association with consequences. Reinforcing a behavior increases the likelihood it will occur again in the future, while punishing a behavior decreases the likelihood that it will be repeated. In operant conditioning, schedules of reinforcement are an important component of the learning process. When and how often we reinforce a behavior can have a dramatic impact on the strength and rate of the response.

A schedule of reinforcement is basically a rule stating which instances of a behavior will be reinforced. In some cases, a behavior might be reinforced every time it occurs. Sometimes, a behavior might not be reinforced at all. Either positive reinforcement or negative reinforcement might be used, depending on the situation. The goal of reinforcement is always to strengthen the behavior and increase the likelihood that it will occur again in the future.

Training might call for starting out with one schedule and switching to another once the desired behavior has been taught. Certain schedules of reinforcement may be more effective in specific situations. The two types of reinforcement schedules are continuous reinforcement and partial reinforcement.

Continuous Reinforcement Schedules

In continuous reinforcement, the desired behavior is reinforced every single time it occurs. This schedule is best used during the initial stages of learning in order to create a strong association between the behavior and the response. For example, when teaching a dog to shake hands, the owner reinforces the behavior each time it is performed correctly until it is well established.

Partial Reinforcement Schedules

In partial or intermittent reinforcement, the response is reinforced only part of the time. This method acquires learned behaviors more slowly but results in responses being more resistant to extinction. There are four schedules of partial reinforcement:

• Fixed-ratio schedules: A response is reinforced only after a specified number of responses.
• Variable-ratio schedules: A response is reinforced after an unpredictable number of responses.
• Fixed-interval schedules: The first response is rewarded only after a specified amount of time has elapsed.
• Variable-interval schedules: A response is rewarded after an unpredictable amount of time has passed.

Choosing a Schedule of Reinforcement

Choosing when to reinforce behavior can depend on various factors. In teaching a new behavior, a continuous schedule is often effective, while switching to a partial schedule once the behavior is learned can be more practical for real-life scenarios. Partial schedules are more realistic and easier to implement, producing higher response rates and being less susceptible to extinction.

Extinction in Psychology

Extinction refers to the gradual weakening of a conditioned response, causing the behavior to decrease or disappear. For instance, if the reinforcement for a dog to shake hands is removed, over time, the dog will stop exhibiting that behavior.

Factors influencing extinction include the strength of the original conditioning and habituation, whereby repeated exposure to a stimulus can lead to a reduced response. Personality factors may also play a role; anxious individuals may take longer to extinguish a conditioned response than non-anxious individuals.

Conclusion

Understanding reinforcement schedules is essential in operant conditioning, influencing how behaviors are learned and sustained. Continuous reinforcement is effective for initial learning, while partial reinforcement tends to be more advantageous for maintaining learned behaviors. Extinction is a complex process influenced by various factors, highlighting the importance of reinforcement schedules in behavioral psychology.

References

• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Free Press.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• McSweeney, F. K., & Murphy, E. S. (2009). Partial Reinforcement: Pigeon and Human Studies. Oregon State University Press.
• Ferster, C. B. & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Rescorla, R. A. (2004). Spontaneous recovery. In J. M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 1277–1285). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. London: Oxford University Press.
• Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in Animals. New York: Macmillan.
• Catania, A. C. (1992). Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Schultz, W. (2006). Behavioral theories and neurophysiological mechanisms of reinforcement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(2), 111-126.
• Hernández, A., et al. (2011). Conditioning and behavior: The principle of reinforcement. Animal Learning & Behavior, 39(2), 123-133.