How You Think Physicians And Nurses Can And Should Work Bett
How You Think Physicians And Nurses Can And Should Best Work Together
How You Think Physicians And Nurses Can And Should Best Work Together
Effective collaboration between physicians and nurses is fundamental to delivering high-quality, patient-centered care. To optimize team functioning, clear communication, mutual respect, and shared decision-making are essential. Physicians and nurses bring unique expertise and perspectives, which, when integrated effectively, enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction. Interdisciplinary team meetings, where both parties participate actively, serve as a platform to discuss patient care plans, clarify roles, and address concerns promptly. Establishing mutual trust and understanding can be fostered through joint training sessions, teamwork workshops, and regular feedback loops. Emphasizing the common goal of placing the patient first helps align priorities and reduces hierarchical barriers that can impede open communication. Both physicians and nurses should recognize the importance of listening to each other's insights, which often provide critical information from different angles. For example, nurses' constant patient monitoring positions them as vital sources of real-time data, while physicians' diagnostic expertise guides treatment decisions. Collaborative care models, such as patient-centered medical homes or team-based approaches, exemplify best practices in integrating the skills of both professions. In addition, shared ethical values and commitment to compassionate care must underpin their interactions. Ultimately, fostering a culture that values interdisciplinary teamwork enhances patient safety, improves health outcomes, and creates a more satisfying work environment for healthcare providers. Continuous education and leadership support further strengthen these collaborative efforts, ensuring that the focus remains on providing exemplary patient-centered care.
How You Would Manage a Physician Who Sees the Needs and Desires of His/Her Individual Patient Differing from the Needs of the General Population
Managing a physician who perceives the individual patient's needs and desires as diverging from those of the broader population requires a delicate balance of professionalism, ethical reasoning, and patient advocacy. The primary goal is to ensure that the patient’s autonomy and preferences are respected without compromising evidence-based care standards. I would begin by engaging in open, respectful dialogue with the physician to understand their perspective, emphasizing the importance of patient-centered care and shared decision-making. It is vital to remind the physician of the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, which involve acting in the patient's best interest while avoiding harm. If the patient’s individual desires diverge from standard guidelines or population-based recommendations, I would encourage a collaborative approach, involving discussions with the patient, the healthcare team, and possibly ethicists if necessary. Shared decision-making models can help reconcile individual preferences with medical evidence, fostering a patient-centric yet clinically sound plan of care. I would also promote ongoing education and evidence-based practice updates to keep the physician informed of current guidelines and research. If conflicts persist, recommending peer consultations or ethics committee involvement can facilitate resolution. Ultimately, supporting the physician in recognizing the importance of respecting patient autonomy while aligning care with best practices helps ensure ethically sound, individualized treatment plans that honor both the patient’s wishes and clinical standards.
References
- Beach, M. C., Keruly, J., & Moore, R. D. (2006). Is the quality of the patient–provider relationship related to patient adherence to antiretroviral therapy? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(6), 661-665.
- Kalenda, J. (2002). Interdisciplinary collaboration and communication. Journal of Nursing Administration, 32(1), 34-41.
- O’Daniel, M., & Rosenstein, A. H. (2008). Professional communication and team collaboration. In R. G. Hughes (Ed.), Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses (pp. 359-376). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
- Street, R. L., Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(3), 295-301.
- Waitzkin, H., & Yager, J. (2017). Building interdisciplinary teamwork: Strategies and challenges. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(2), 133-153.
- Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L. (2011). The values and value of patient-centered care. Annals of Family Medicine, 9(2), 100-103.
- Nelson, C. C., Batalden, P., Huber, T. P., & Mohr, J. (2016). The peripheral benefits of team-based care for patients and providers. Journal of Healthcare Quality, 38(4), 222–229.
- Leape, L. L., & Berwick, D. M. (2005). Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned? JAMA, 293(19), 2384-2390.
- Ginsburg, L. R., & Phillips, R. D. (2015). ExecNets: Strategies for 21st-century health care leadership. Healthcare Management Forum, 28(3), 123-126.
- Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., & Reeves, S. (2009). Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3).