Hulls' Theory Is Based On Associations And Tolman's Theory
Hulls Theory Is Based Around Associations And Tolmans Theory Is Base
Hull’s theory emphasizes the role of associations formed through stimulus-response connections and drive reduction in motivating behavior. According to Clark Hull, motivation is primarily a function of maintaining homeostasis, with behaviors reinforced when they reduce physiological drives like hunger, thirst, or fatigue. Learning, in this context, involves strengthening stimuli and responses through reinforcement, leading to habitual behaviors aimed at drive reduction. Hull’s model suggests that learners are motivated by external stimuli that trigger responses reinforced by internal drives, thus facilitating goal-directed behavior necessary for academic success.
In contrast, Edward Tolman’s theory underscores purposive behavior, emphasizing cognitive processes and goal-oriented actions. Tolman proposed that motivation is driven by cognitive maps and expectations, where learners develop mental representations of their environment and associate behaviors with their expected outcomes. He argued that learning involves acquiring knowledge of relationships among stimuli and responses, which guides future behavior even in the absence of reinforcement. Tolman’s perspective indicates that motivation arises from an understanding of goals and the belief that certain actions will lead to desired results, thereby shaping learning strategies conducive to academic achievement.
Comparison of Hull’s and Tolman’s Theories on Motivation and Learning
| Hull’s Theory | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Associative Learning Through Reinforcement | Hull believed that behaviors are learned and maintained through associations formed via reinforcement. For example, a student who receives praise after submitting a good paper is more likely to repeat this behavior, driven by the drive reduction and reinforcement cycle. |
| Drive Reduction as Motivation | Hull posited that biological drives create motivation to act; in academic settings, the drive to succeed academically is motivated by internal needs such as the desire for approval or fear of failure, leading to behaviors aimed at reducing those drives. |
| Tolman’s Theory | Explanation |
| Cognitive Goals and Expectations | Tolman emphasized that motivation is linked to expectations about future rewards; learners are motivated by the belief that their actions will lead to positive outcomes, such as good grades or mastery of a subject. |
| Learning as Acquisition of Knowledge and Mental Maps | In Tolman’s view, learners develop mental representations that inform behavior even without immediate reinforcement. For instance, a student studying for a test understands the relationship between study time and potential grades, guiding their motivation. |
Application of Hull’s Theory to Scenarios
Scenario 1: Alan and Cynthia’s Drinking Behaviors
Using Hull’s theory, Alan’s behavior of drinking beers while watching sports can be explained as a response reinforced by the association between relaxation, social activity, and the pleasurable act of drinking. The external stimulus of watching sports creates a drive or motivation to relax, which is fulfilled by alcohol consumption, reinforcing this behavior through a reduction in stress or tension. Similarly, Cynthia’s glass of wine with dinner can be understood as a learned response where social and cultural associations reinforce the behavior, possibly serving to satisfy a social drive or to enhance the dining experience. Both behaviors are driven by learned associations that are reinforced through the reduction of internal drives such as stress or social desire.
Application of Tolman’s Theory to Scenarios
Scenario 2: Tim and Gerald’s Beliefs about Grades
According to Tolman’s theory, Tim’s belief that studying leads to good grades reflects an expectation and mental mapping that studying will result in positive academic outcomes. His motivation is based on his understanding of the relationship between effort and reward, which sustains his drive to study. Conversely, Gerald’s belief that grades depend on whether the instructor grades on the curve illustrates a different expectation; he perceives the outcome as contingent upon external factors outside his control. His motivation is influenced by this expectation, which might decrease his effort if he believes the curve is unpredictable or unfavorable. These contrasting beliefs demonstrate how cognitive expectations shape motivation and learning, according to Tolman.
Comparative Chart
| Hull’s Theory | Key Points | How It Directs Motivation & Learning |
|---|---|---|
| Associations formed through reinforcement | Behaviors are learned when stimuli are reinforced by drives that reduce physiological needs. | Students are motivated to repeat behaviors that have previously been reinforced, such as studying and receiving praise, to satisfy internal drives. |
| Drive reduction | Motivation stems from biological needs; behavior aims to reduce drive states. | Academic behaviors are driven by the desire to reduce stress or failure anxiety, promoting consistent effort in learning. |
| Tolman’s Theory | Key Points | How It Directs Motivation & Learning |
| Expectations and cognitive maps | Behavior is guided by mental representations and anticipated outcomes. | Students are motivated by their expectations of success; belief in the relationship between effort and reward influences study habits. |
| Learning as acquisition of knowledge and purpose | Learning involves understanding relationships between stimuli and responses based on goals. | Academic motivation is sustained when learners comprehend how their actions lead to desired results, such as good grades or mastery. |
Conclusion
Both Hull’s and Tolman’s theories offer valuable insights into motivation and learning in academic settings. Hull’s emphasis on associations and drive reduction underscores the importance of reinforcement and physiological needs, which reinforce behaviors contributing to academic success. Tolman’s focus on purposive behavior and cognitive expectations highlights the role of mental representations and goals in sustaining motivation. Understanding these theories can help educators tailor instructional strategies that motivate students effectively by considering both stimulus-response associations and cognitive expectations, thereby enhancing learning outcomes in diverse educational environments.
References
- Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men. New York: Psychological Review.
- Miller, R. L. (2004). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Boston: Pearson.
- Schunk, D. H. (2012). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Pearson.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
- Weiner, B. (2010). The Future of Achievement Motivation Theory. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 37-49.
- Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Educational Psychology: Developing Learners. Pearson.
- Reeve, J. (2015). Understanding Motivation and Emotion. Wiley.
- Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge.
- Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–669.