Human Made Hazards: Terrorism, Civil Unrest, And Technology
3human Made Hazards Terrorism Civil Unrest And Technological Hazard
3 Human-Made Hazards: Terrorism, Civil Unrest, and Technological Hazards What are some of the factors that influence the public’s perception of the level of risk we face from human-made hazards? How can this public perception affect how emergency managers follow the emergence preparedness plan and other mitigation and preparedness activities? Read the case study on the Flooding in Texas from Hurricane Harvey. (Links to an external site.) and discuss how the public’s perception of the human-made hazard may affect future preparedness plans. Your paper should be 4-5-
Paper For Above instruction
Understanding public perception of human-made hazards such as terrorism, civil unrest, and technological failures is crucial for effective emergency management. Public perception influences how communities respond to risks, adhere to safety protocols, and support mitigation efforts. Several factors shape this perception, including media coverage, personal experience, cultural beliefs, education level, trust in authorities, and previous exposure to hazards.
Media plays a vital role in shaping public perception by highlighting specific risks, often emphasizing worst-case scenarios or sensational stories that may either exaggerate or downplay the actual threat. For instance, extensive media coverage of terrorism incidents or technological disasters can heighten public fears, prompting more cautious or even overreactive behaviors. Conversely, lack of media emphasis can lead to complacency, causing the public to underestimate risks. Personal experience also significantly impacts perception; individuals who have directly experienced or witnessed a hazard tend to perceive it as more threatening, influencing their support for preparedness measures.
Cultural beliefs and education influence how communities interpret risk information. For example, certain groups may distrust governmental agencies due to historical or socio-political reasons, affecting their willingness to comply with official guidance. Trust in authorities is pivotal; when trust is high, the public is more likely to accept and follow emergency directives, whereas distrust can lead to resistance or denial, undermining preparedness activities.
The case study of flooding in Texas during Hurricane Harvey offers valuable insights into how public perception of hazards impacts future preparedness. During the event, the community’s perception of flood risks was influenced by prior awareness, trust in local authorities, and media reporting. Some residents underestimated the flood threat due to previous experiences with minor flooding, leading to delayed evacuation responses. Others overestimated the danger, causing unnecessary panic and resource allocation. This variance in perception affected emergency response strategies and highlighted the necessity for clear communication to align public understanding with actual risks.
Public perception directly influences the effectiveness of emergency management plans. If the community perceives a hazard as unlikely or non-threatening, they may neglect preparedness activities such as evacuation plans, securing property, or adhering to safety advisories. Conversely, heightened perception can lead to proactive behaviors but also to panic or complacency if not properly managed. Emergency managers must work to foster accurate perceptions through credible, consistent communication, public education campaigns, and community engagement.
Looking ahead, perceptions of technological hazards—like cyber-attacks or industrial accidents—will shape future preparedness strategies. As technological reliance increases, so does the public consciousness of potential risks. Proper risk communication organizations can enhance awareness without inciting unnecessary fear, ensuring that communities actively participate in mitigation efforts. The Texas flooding case underscores the importance of understanding community perceptions to develop tailored messaging and effectively allocate resources.
Ultimately, public perception acts as a significant determinant in the success of emergency preparedness and response efforts. By understanding and influencing these perceptions through transparent communication, education, and building trust, emergency managers can improve community resilience to human-made hazards. The case of Hurricane Harvey demonstrates that aligning public perception with actual risks facilitates more effective preparedness planning, timely response, and recovery efforts, minimizing loss of life and property damage.
References
- Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in HSPD-8 and the Homeland Security Act: Building community resilience. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 4(4), 1-33.
- Mileti, D. S. (1999). Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press.
- Paton, D., & McClure, J. (2009). Ready or not? Exploring the psychological preparedness for natural hazards. Disaster Prevention and Management, 18(2), 170-187.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2012). Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative. The National Academies Press.
- Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012). The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical improvements and empirical tests. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 616-632.
- Tierney, K. (2019). Emergency Management in the Federal System. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 16(2).
- Haddow, G. D., Bullock, J. A., & Coppola, D. P. (2017). Introduction to Emergency Management. Elsevier.
- Glik, D. C. (2007). Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 33-54.
- Wray, R., & Halpern, D. (2010). Community resilience to natural disasters. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(4), 1643–1651.
- Schmid, K., et al. (2013). Community perceptions of flooding and adaptive responses: A case study in Texas. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 6(2), 157–167.