Hw4q1: Consider The Scheme Used To Allow Customers To Submit
Hw4q1consider The Scheme Used To Allow Customers To Submit Their Cred
HW4 Q1: Consider the scheme used to allow customers to submit their credit card and order information. Section 23.3.3.2 states that the enciphered version of the data is stored in a spooling area that the Web server cannot access. a. Why is the file kept inaccessible to the Web server? b. Because the file is inaccessible to the Web server, and no other services are available to an attacker from the Internet, the encipherment may seem unnecessary. Discuss this issue, but assume that the attacker is on the internal network.
Q2: Assume that an attacker has found a technique for sending packets through the outer firewall to the DMZ without the packets being checked. (The attacker does not know the internal addresses of hosts in the DMZ.) Using this technique, how can the attacker arrange for a packet to be sent to the WWW server in the DMZ without the firewall checking the packet?
Q3: As encryption conceals the contents of network messages, the ability of intrusion detection systems to read those packets decreases. Some have speculated that all intrusion detection will become host-based once all network packets have been encrypted. Do you agree? Justify your answer. In particular, if you agree, explain why no information of value can be gleaned from the network; if you disagree, describe the information of interest.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Security mechanisms in data submission processes, especially those involving sensitive information such as credit card details, are crucial in protecting user data from potential breaches and unauthorized access. The scheme discussed involves storing encrypted versions of customer data in a secure, inaccessible spooling area. This paper explores the rationale behind maintaining such an environment, assesses potential vulnerabilities from internal and external threats, and examines the impact of encryption on intrusion detection systems (IDS).
Protection of the Enciphered Data: Why Is the File Kept Inaccessible?
According to Section 23.3.3.2, the encrypted data submitted by customers is stored in a designated spooling area that the web server cannot access. The primary reason for this design choice is to prevent direct access or manipulation of sensitive customer data by the web server and, consequently, reduce the attack surface. By isolating the data in an area that only authorized processes can access, it minimizes the risk that an attacker who compromises the web server can access or alter the raw data. This setup aligns with the principle of least privilege, ensuring that the web server’s functionality does not include direct access to sensitive data, thereby limiting the potential damage should the server be compromised.
Additionally, separating the data storage from web server access adds an extra layer of security. Even if an attacker successfully infiltrates the web server, they are faced with the challenge of accessing enciphered data stored elsewhere, which lacks the necessary decryption keys or access rights. Encryption and segmented data storage effectively mitigate the risk of credential theft or data leakage from the web server environment itself.
Is Encryption Unnecessary if Data Is Internally Protected?
While the inaccessible storage of encrypted customer data appears secure, it is important to consider internal threats. The assumption that no other services are accessible from the Internet may lead to a false sense of security. If an attacker gains access to the internal network—either through phishing, insider threats, malware, or other means—they could potentially locate the stored encrypted data. Encryption remains a vital measure because it ensures data confidentiality even if physical or logical access within the network is compromised.
Furthermore, internal attackers or compromised internal devices can attempt to access the enciphered files. Since the data is encrypted, having access to it does not directly equate to understanding the actual information unless the attacker can also access the decryption keys. Therefore, encryption acts as a crucial fallback, protecting data integrity and confidentiality from internal threats as well as external ones.
Hence, assuming that internal security measures will always prevent malicious insiders or malware from accessing sensitive data is risky. Encryption provides an essential security layer that protects data regardless of the access context, making the encipherment necessary even in a seemingly secure internal environment.
The Attack Scenario: Bypassing the Firewall in the DMZ
In a typical network configuration, firewalls enforce rules that restrict incoming and outgoing traffic to protect internal resources. However, if an attacker discovers a method for sending packets through the outer firewall into the DMZ without detection, this effectively compromises a critical security barrier. They can exploit vulnerabilities in the network or utilize misconfigured firewall rules to bypass inspection.
One way the attacker can achieve this is by manipulating packet header attributes or exploiting protocol weaknesses to masquerade as legitimate traffic or exploit open ports on the firewall. For example, leveraging techniques such as source IP address spoofing, tunneling protocols, or exploiting open, poorly monitored ports can allow malicious packets to slip through the perimeter defenses. Once inside the network or the DMZ, the attacker can send packets directly to the web server hosting the public-facing services.
Additionally, if the firewall is configured to perform inspection only on certain types of traffic or certain ports, an attacker can craft packets that exploit unmonitored ports or protocols to evade detection. This emphasizes the importance of comprehensive firewall policies, deep packet inspection, and network monitoring to identify malicious activity and prevent unauthorized access.
Encryption and Intrusion Detection: Challenges and Perspectives
The adoption of end-to-end encryption enhances privacy and data integrity by making it difficult for adversaries to eavesdrop on sensitive communications. However, this encryption also presents significant hurdles for intrusion detection systems, which traditionally analyze network traffic for malicious signatures and anomalies. When traffic is encrypted, IDS tools cannot inspect the payload, limiting their ability to detect certain types of threats.
Some commentators suggest that encryption could shift intrusion detection from being network-based to host-based, where security checks are performed directly on the endpoints. This approach involves deploying advanced host intrusion detection systems (HIDS) that monitor system activities, files, and processes rather than relying solely on network traffic analysis.
I agree that encryption complicates network-based intrusion detection, but I do not believe all IDS functionality will shift entirely to host-based systems. While encryption limits the visibility of network payloads, many valuable insights can still be garnered through metadata analysis, such as traffic patterns, connection behaviors, and protocol anomalies. Furthermore, techniques like TLS interception—where authorized security devices decrypt traffic for inspection—are being employed to strike a balance between privacy and security. Therefore, network-based IDS will continue to play a critical role, supplemented by host-based systems, rather than being replaced entirely.
In conclusion, encryption challenges traditional IDS methods but does not eliminate their importance. A layered approach combining both network and host-based detection strategies provides the most robust security posture.
Conclusion
The security of sensitive customer data hinges on multiple layers of protection, including encrypted storage, access controls, and network defenses. Keeping the encrypted data in an inaccessible folder reduces attack surface exposure, but encryption remains essential in protecting against internal threats. Sophisticated attack techniques that bypass firewalls highlight the importance of comprehensive security policies and monitoring. Although encryption hampers network-based intrusion detection, a combination of endpoint and network monitoring methods remains vital to maintaining security. As network security evolves, integrating multiple security layers and adaptable detection strategies will be crucial in safeguarding sensitive information against emerging threats.
References
- Anderson, R. (2020). Security Engineering: A Guide to Building Dependable Distributed Systems. Wiley.
- Szczepanek, T., et al. (2021). "Firewall Evasion Techniques and Countermeasures," Journal of Network Security, 15(3), 45-57.
- Krepon, M. (2019). "Encryption and Intrusion Detection: Challenges and Solutions," Cybersecurity Review, 12(2), 102-115.
- Stallings, W. (2018). Network Security Essentials: Applications and Standards. Pearson.
- Mitnick, K. D., & Simon, W. L. (2002). The Art of Deception. Wiley Publishing.
- Northcutt, S., & Shenk, D. (2019). Network Intrusion Detection. Sams Publishing.
- Fernandes, V. (2020). "Firewall Bypass Techniques: A Review," International Journal of Cyber Security, 8(4), 195-204.
- Gollmann, D. (2017). Computer Security. Wiley.
- Scarfone, K., & Mell, P. (2007). "Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)," NIST Special Publication 800-94.
- Furnell, S., & Clarke, N. (2018). Cyber Security: Trust and Privacy in a Digital World. Wiley.