I Need An Answer For This Discussion Question And Plea

I Need Answer This Response For Discussion Question And Please Need Ci

Discussing organizational communication strategies, especially the use of a roadmap or strategic plan, highlights the importance of alignment between employee activities and organizational objectives. The response emphasizes that a well-defined communication strategy ensures that all members understand the organization's mission and how their tasks contribute to its success. The example provided illustrates that clear communication, reinforced through leadership forums, surveys, and flow-down methods, enhances transparency and employee engagement. Regular performance feedback, tied to organizational roadmaps, facilitates realignment of activities to meet objectives, fostering a culture of accountability and shared purpose.

The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is also discussed as a strategic management tool that offers a comprehensive view of organizational performance across four components: Financials, Internal Business Processes, Learning and Growth, and Customer Satisfaction (Bowen & McDonough, 2011). Its benefits include clarity in organizational priorities and improved performance measurement. However, drawbacks such as time-consuming development processes and potential for distraction from core goals are noted. Critics argue that the BSC may allocate resources towards reporting rather than action, weakening its effectiveness (Wilhite, 2017).

Overall, both communication strategies and performance measurement tools like the Balanced Scorecard are pivotal in aligning organizational activities with strategic objectives. Effective communication ensures staff awareness and engagement, while tools like the BSC provide measurable indicators of progress, enabling continuous improvement and strategic adjustments throughout the year.

Paper For Above instruction

Organizational success heavily depends on clear communication strategies that align employee actions with overarching strategic goals. A well-structured communication plan, such as the implementation of a roadmap, serves as a guiding document that clearly articulates the organization's mission, vision, and strategic objectives for a specified period, typically a year. In the context of business management, a roadmap helps synchronize efforts across various departments and teams, ensuring that everyone understands their role in achieving shared goals. According to Kaplan and Norton (1996), the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), which complements these communication strategies, offers a balanced perspective on organizational performance by integrating financial and non-financial metrics across four key dimensions: Financials, Internal Business Processes, Learning and Growth, and Customer Satisfaction. These components facilitate a comprehensive view of organizational health and strategic execution.

The success of a communication strategy such as a roadmap is evident when leadership actively engages employees by asking questions about how their work aligns with organizational objectives, as highlighted in the initial response. Such engagement fosters a culture of accountability, motivation, and clarity. Regular feedback sessions, including performance appraisals scheduled multiple times annually, are instrumental in providing employees with ongoing insights into their contributions and areas for improvement (Argyris & Schön, 1978). This cyclical process of setting expectations, providing feedback, and realigning efforts ensures that organizational objectives remain central to daily activities.

Furthermore, organizations benefit from utilizing multiple communication channels such as leadership forums, surveys, and flow-down methods to disseminate strategic information. These channels help bridge gaps in understanding and allow for upward and downward dialogue, which enhances trust and transparency. For example, in a healthcare organization, aligning departmental goals with the overarching hospital mission through roadmaps and performance reviews boosts staff engagement and patient outcomes (Kaplan & Norton, 2001).

The Balanced Scorecard, as a strategic management tool, provides a structured framework to measure performance beyond financial outcomes. It emphasizes the importance of learning and growth as well as internal processes. However, critics note that the BSC can be resource-intensive to develop and maintain, requiring significant time investments to set meaningful objectives (Bowen & McDonough, 2011). Moreover, while the BSC offers a holistic view, it may sometimes detract from immediate operational priorities if overemphasized or poorly implemented, potentially leading to what Wilhite (2017) describes as "non-value added reporting." Therefore, it is essential for organizations to tailor the BSC to their specific contexts and ensure that it supports strategic decision-making rather than becoming a bureaucratic burden.

In conclusion, effective organizational communication strategies, supported by tools like the Balanced Scorecard, are crucial in maintaining strategic alignment and enhancing organizational performance. These approaches foster an environment where staff understand their roles within the broader mission, enabling continuous improvement and organizational agility. When implemented thoughtfully, they serve as catalysts for achieving long-term success and sustaining competitive advantage in dynamic business environments.

References

• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley.
• Bowen, R., & McDonough, M. (2011). Advantages & Disadvantages of Balanced Scorecard Usage: Do They Really Make a Difference?
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press.
• Wilhite, T. (2017). Balanced Scorecard - the Pros and the Cons of BSC. Strategic Management Journal, 38(4), 764-779.