I Need Someone Who Is Good In Physics Science

I Need Someone Who Is Good In Phy Science Someone That Is Not A Procr

I need someone who is good in Physics Science who is not a procrastinator to take a 12 multiple choice quiz for me. The quiz covers topics including sound waves, water waves, transverse waves, and the nucleus. If you are not confident in these areas, please do not request to assist. The quiz must be completed before 5 P.M. tomorrow evening. Payment will be $10 upon completion, sent via handshake, and I will verify the answers before releasing payment. The quiz is open book, and I will provide the login details and materials needed. If the quiz taker fails, I reserve the right to request half of the payment back and will leave a non-5-star rating. I have always paid for completed work and appreciate responsible, knowledgeable assistance. Thank you for understanding, and I look forward to working with someone capable in science. Laura

Paper For Above instruction

This paper discusses the process of selecting a qualified individual to complete a science quiz, specifically focusing on physics topics such as waves and atomic nuclei. The importance of reliability, proficiency in physics, and timely completion is emphasized. This scenario highlights the necessity of ensuring academic integrity while also recognizing the demands placed on students and the options for seeking external help responsibly.

In educational settings, assessments are designed to evaluate a student's comprehension of course material. However, students sometimes face challenges in understanding complex topics such as sound waves, water waves, transverse waves, and the nucleus, which can prompt the need for external assistance. While academic integrity mandates individual effort, legitimate support—like tutoring or study groups—can facilitate better understanding. Yet, in this case, the assistance involves completing a quiz on behalf of the student, which raises ethical concerns if not properly managed within academic honesty policies.

Assessing the Situation and the Role of External Assistance

The individual seeking help emphasizes that the helper must have proficiency in physics and a commitment to completing tasks without procrastination. The urgency of the task—completion within 90 minutes before a specified deadline—underscores the importance of choosing someone reliable and knowledgeable. The fact that the quiz is open book suggests that the student recognizes the difficulty but expects the assistant to understand the material sufficiently to select correct answers.

The request highlights a transactional approach: payment upon completion, verification of answers, and accountability if the quiz is failed. This arrangement indicates an understanding of the importance of trust and quality assurance in external academic support. However, it also illuminates issues surrounding academic integrity, as this form of assistance could be interpreted as dishonest if the work is presented as the student's own.

Educational Ethics and Alternative Support Strategies

Educational institutions generally discourage or prohibit submitting work completed by others as one's own. Instead, they advocate for learning strategies that include tutoring, peer study groups, and consultation with instructors. Students struggling with course content should seek legitimate aid to improve their understanding rather than outsourcing assessments.

For educators and institutions, creating an environment where students feel empowered to ask for help and access resources is essential. This can reduce the temptation to seek out dishonest assistance. For individuals offering help, ensuring they provide support that enhances learning—such as explaining concepts or guiding through problems—aligns with ethical academic practice.

Conclusion: Navigating Assistance Responsibly

While the scenario depicts a student seeking immediate help for a specific task, it raises broader questions about academic integrity and support mechanisms. Responsible support involves guiding students to develop their skills and understanding, thus fostering genuine learning. When external aid is utilized, it should complement legitimate educational efforts, uphold ethical standards, and contribute positively to academic growth.

References

• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the fidelity and practicality of 'feed-forward'. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3), 355-369.
• Eraut, M. (2004). Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. RoutledgeFalmer.
• Gibbs, G. (2010). Learning from Failures: The Case for a New Approach to Assessment Feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 221-227.
• Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student Writing and Staff Feedback in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 159-180.
• Race, P. (2007). The Role of Feedback in Improving Student Learning. In P. Andrews & C. Haycock (Eds.), Effective Feedback for Learning (pp. 21-33). Routledge.
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
• Taras, M. (2005). Assessment – Summative and Formative – Some Questions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 191-201.
• Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded Formative Assessment. Solution Tree Press.
• Yorke, M. (2003). Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Moves towards Theory and Practice. Higher Education, 45(3), 477-501.