I Need This Today By 5 Pm Question 1 After Reading About The

I Need This Today By 5pmquestion 1after Reading About The Advantages

I Need this today by 5pm Question 1 after reading about the advantages and disadvantages of incineration of medical waste on p. 566 of the textbook, do you think that incineration is the best option for medical waste? Why, or why not? What are some good alternatives? Which of these alternatives do you think to be the most "sustainable" for the safety of the process and our future ecosystem environment. What's "Sustainability"....Provide a good, working definition. This concept is growing rapidly and will be part of our lives for many years to come. APA Format and 150-word minimum

Paper For Above instruction

The incineration of medical waste has long been a standard practice due to its effectiveness in reducing pathogens and volume of waste, as well as its ability to prevent the spread of infectious diseases (Sharma & Kumar, 2018). However, considering environmental and health concerns, incineration may not be the optimal solution. Incineration releases harmful pollutants, including dioxins and furans, which are persistent environmental toxins linked to cancer and reproductive issues (WHO, 2016). These disadvantages suggest the need for alternative waste management practices that prioritize sustainability and safety.

One promising alternative to incineration is autoclaving, which uses pressurized steam to sterilize waste without releasing toxic emissions (Bell et al., 2018). Chemical disinfection is another option but may pose risks of chemical exposure and residual waste. Additionally, advanced waste treatment technologies like plasma arc destruction utilize high temperatures to break down waste safely and with minimal emissions (Gao & Hu, 2019). Among these options, autoclaving is often considered the most sustainable due to its lower environmental impact and effectiveness.

Sustainability, in this context, refers to the capacity to meet present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs (Brundtland Commission, 1987). It involves managing waste and resources responsibly to minimize ecological footprints, protect human health, and ensure environmental integrity over the long term. For medical waste, this means adopting practices that are environmentally sound, economically feasible, and socially responsible.

In conclusion, while incineration effectively manages infectious waste, its environmental drawbacks outweigh its benefits. Alternatives like autoclaving or plasma arc destruction offer safer, more sustainable solutions that protect ecosystems and human health, aligning with the principles of sustainable development.

References

Bell, R., Das, S., & Sharma, S. (2018). Advances in Medical Waste Management: Autoclaving and Beyond. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(7), 3704-3714.

Gao, H., & Hu, L. (2019). Plasma Arc Technology for Waste Treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 1082-1090.

Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.

Sharma, P., & Kumar, A. (2018). Environmental Impacts of Medical Waste Incineration. Waste Management, 78, 227-237.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2016). Waste incineration and its impact on health and environment. Geneva: WHO.

(Note: For demonstration, fictional references have been formatted; replace with actual credible sources for real academic work.)