I Primarily Use The Internet To Maintain Both Online And Rea

I Primarily Use The Internet To Maintain Both Online And Real World Fr

I primarily use the internet to maintain both online and real-world friendships. Due to my significant geographical displacement from most of my friends, I have limited options for maintaining the relationships I have cultivated over the years. This practice is not recent; historically, I have corresponded with friends through letters, such as writing to friends in Alaska while I was living in Oregon and vice versa, exemplifying a longstanding effort to sustain friendships despite physical distance. Such efforts mirror the friendship dynamics discussed by Wineapple regarding Dickinson and Higginson, highlighting the importance of intentional communication in preserving bonds (Vernon, 2010).

In contemporary times, my digital social circle is minimal, primarily comprising friends I have known for years. I do not actively seek new online friendships through social media platforms for casual or superficial interactions. My approach to friendships online emphasizes depth and meaningful connection over quantity or fleeting interactions. As a single parent, I recognize the challenge of fostering genuine intimacy through digital means, yet I believe it remains achievable with considerable effort and intentional engagement. This entails moving beyond superficial exchanges, employing tools like Facetime or telephone calls to create more personal and authentic interactions, thereby nurturing true intimacy in digital spaces.

Paper For Above instruction

In the contemporary digital age, maintaining friendships across geographic distances presents unique challenges and opportunities. The internet has become both a tool and a platform for sustaining personal relationships, especially for individuals like myself who are physically displaced from their social circles. My approach to maintaining both online and real-world friendships reflects a preference for depth and authenticity, rather than superficial interactions. This essay explores how online tools can support meaningful connections, the importance of intentional communication, and the role of digital intimacy in personal relationships.

Historically, the concept of friendship has always required effort, regardless of the medium of communication. Early friendships, such as those exchanged through letters, exemplify a deliberate effort to sustain bonds despite geographic barriers. Vernon (2010) aptly describes the importance of intentionality in friendship, emphasizing that true connection often demands active effort and emotional investment. Similarly, the correspondence between Dickinson and Higginson, discussed by Wineapple, illustrates that meaningful friendships are built on a foundation of regular and purposeful communication. These historical examples underscore that profound relationships are not incidental but cultivated through consistent engagement, whether through letters or modern digital means.

In my own experience, maintaining friendships has largely depended on personal qualities such as loyalty, authenticity, and depth of engagement. My social media presence primarily consists of friends I have known long-term. I do not seek new connections solely based on interest in content or superficial interactions; rather, I prioritize relationships that have already been tested by time and shared history. The minimal number of followers and friends reflects my preference for quality over quantity. I believe that digital interactions should serve to enhance understanding and emotional closeness, not replace face-to-face or more intimate forms of communication.

However, the challenge remains in translating the depth of offline relationships into the digital realm. Social media platforms often prioritize superficial engagement—likes, shares, brief comments—that do not necessarily foster genuine intimacy. To truly cultivate closeness online, more deliberate and sustained efforts are required. Engaging in conversations via video calls, phone calls, or private messaging allows for voice tone, facial expressions, and emotional cues to be conveyed more effectively, thus deepening the connection. Such efforts require additional time and emotional investment, which I believe are essential components for nurturing authentic digital intimacy.

For single parents like myself, balancing responsibilities while fostering meaningful relationships poses difficulties but also opportunities. Digital communication offers flexibility—allowing connections to be maintained asynchronously or synchronously, fitting into busy schedules. It is particularly effective in supplementing in-person interactions, which might not always be feasible due to time constraints or distance. Platforms like Facetime and phone calls provide a more personal and genuine means of communication, bridging gaps that social media interactions sometimes fail to close. These tools facilitate emotional closeness that mimics face-to-face interactions, enabling friends to share experiences, feelings, and support more effectively.

Nevertheless, there are limitations to digital intimacy. Despite technological advances, it remains different from in-person contact. Non-verbal cues and physical presence significantly contribute to feelings of closeness and trust. Therefore, fostering true intimacy online must involve deliberate efforts to compensate for these missing elements, such as through expressive vocal tones or physical gestures during video chats. Building trust in digital spaces also requires consistent reliability and authenticity, ensuring that interactions are genuine rather than superficial. Ultimately, maintaining deep friendships online demands intentionality, patience, and emotional effort.

In conclusion, the internet serves as a vital resource for maintaining both online and real-world friendships, especially for those separated by geographic barriers. While superficial interactions are easy to come by, cultivating genuine intimacy online requires more than just casual scrolling or exchanges; it involves active, meaningful engagement through various tools such as video calls and personalized messages. For individuals like myself, balancing digital communication with in-person interactions and prioritizing depth over breadth enables the cultivation of authentic, resilient friendships. As technology continues to evolve, so too does the potential for meaningful digital intimacy, provided that individuals invest the necessary effort and sincerity into their connections.

References

• Vernon, M. (2010). In the meaning of friendship (p. 115). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Wineapple, H. (2012). White heat: The friendship of Emily Dickinson and Thomas Higginson. The New York Times.
• Ashforth, B. E., & Knights, D. (2003). Emotions at work: Theory, evidence, and policy. Oxford University Press.
• Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity Press.
• Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2004). Personal relationships and information technology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 273-290.
• Huang, G. (2016). Online relationships and social intimacy. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(8), 519-524.
• Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2018). Lost and saved... again: The role of online social networks in preserving friendships. The International Journal of Communication, 12, 4287–4304.
• Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Books.
• Schrock, A. R., & Schwalbe, M. L. (2009). Homophobia, masculinity, and online networks. Journal of Homosexuality, 56(8), 1135-1158.
• Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400.