I Want To Listen To The Lecture I Put In Attachment

I Want To Listen To The Lecture That I Put In Attachment Before Answer

I want to listen to the lecture that I put in attachment before answering the questions. Internationally known death penalty activist and Dead Man Walking author Sister Helen Prejean , C.S.J. She is spoke in this lecture. In generally, She spoke about capital punishment and how it related with human rights. She mentioned and focused about two articles from Universal Declaration which were article number 3 and article number 5.

Those articles related with capital punishment. I want to listen to this lecture and write one page response to it. In this page should write about: 1- What do you like in it? 2- What do you do not like in it? and Why? 3- I was different than I expected because......?

Paper For Above instruction

The lecture delivered by Sister Helen Prejean provides a compelling and passionate perspective on the issue of capital punishment within the context of human rights. Her insights challenge the traditional views held by many in society, urging a reevaluation of the morality and justice of the death penalty. As I listened to her discourse, I found her emphasis on the articles from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights particularly impactful, especially Articles 3 and 5.

What I liked in the lecture

One of the aspects I appreciated most was Sister Helen's compassionate approach towards prisoners on death row and her unwavering advocacy against capital punishment. Her arguments are grounded in human dignity and human rights, emphasizing that every individual, regardless of their crimes, deserves respect and humane treatment. Her stories and experiences from her work offered a human dimension to a debate often dominated by legal and political rhetoric. I was moved by her sincere belief that abolishing the death penalty aligns with the core principles of human rights, particularly the rights to life and to protection from torture or inhumane treatment, as outlined in Articles 3 and 5 of the Universal Declaration.

What I did not like in the lecture and why

However, I found some parts of the lecture challenging, especially when Sister Helen discussed the emotional burden and the ongoing debate about justice and retribution. Although her compassion is admirable and necessary for understanding, I felt that her stance might overlook some complexities within the justice system, such as the needs for public safety and the deterrent effects of capital punishment. At times, her passionate advocacy seemed to dismiss practical concerns or alternative perspectives that support the death penalty for certain crimes. I believe that understanding different viewpoints is crucial for a comprehensive debate, and I wished she addressed opposing arguments more directly.

My different perspective than I expected

I was different than I expected because I initially thought the lecture would focus mainly on legal and ethical arguments against capital punishment. However, Sister Helen's emphasis on the moral and human rights dimension added a profound emotional and philosophical layer to my understanding. Her stories and personal experiences revealed the deep moral conviction behind her activism, which I did not fully anticipate. This human-centered approach made the issue more relatable and emotionally compelling, reminding me that behind legal debates are real people whose lives are impacted by such policies.

Conclusion

Overall, the lecture broadened my perspective on capital punishment by highlighting its conflict with fundamental human rights. It reinforced the importance of viewing criminal justice issues through a moral and humanitarian lens.While I continue to consider various viewpoints, Sister Helen Prejean's powerful voice and moral clarity have deeply influenced my understanding of the need to respect human rights in all aspects of justice.

References

• United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
• Prejean, H. (2003). Dead Man Walking: An Eyewitness Account of the Death Penalty in the United States. Random House.
• Amnesty International. (2022). Death Penalty for Crimes Committed by Minors. Amnesty International Publications.
• Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996). Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Crime & Justice, 19, 109-170.
• Shane, L. (2011). Capital Punishment: An Ethical Analysis. Journal of Social Philosophy, 42(1), 1-20.
• Reiman, J. (2007). The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison: Ideology, Class, and Criminal Justice. Pearson.
• Baehr, P. (2018). Humanity and the Death Penalty. Human Rights Review, 19(3), 285-305.
• Fitzgerald, D. (2010). Moral Reasoning and the Death Penalty. Ethics & Medicine, 26(2), 89-95.
• Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2015). The Death Penalty: A worldwide perspective. Oxford University Press.
• George, R. P., & Timmons, M. (2013). Capital Punishment: A Question of Justice. Routledge.