I Will Provide Microsoft Project File To Build On As A Proje

I Will Provide Microsoft Project File To Build Onas A Project Manager

I Will Provide Microsoft Project File To Build Onas A Project Manager

I WILL PROVIDE MICROSOFT PROJECT FILE TO BUILD ON. As a project manager, you are going to prepare two project outlines for the development of a mobile application. One project outline uses a waterfall model, another uses an agile method. Prepare two project outlines using Microsoft® Project. Each outline shall consist of a task list and a Gantt chart showing task durations and precedence relationships. Include a 350- to 700-word brief explanation of how the two project outlines differ. Be sure to address how Agile addresses complexity and uncertainty.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Effective project management methodologies are critical to the successful development of mobile applications, especially given the varying complexities and uncertainties inherent in software projects. The two predominant approaches, the traditional Waterfall model and the Agile methodology, offer contrasting frameworks for planning, execution, and adaptation. This paper presents two project outlines created using Microsoft Project—one adhering to the Waterfall approach and the other to Agile principles—highlighting their differences and addressing how Agile manages complexity and uncertainty.

Waterfall Model Project Outline

The Waterfall model is a linear, sequential approach where each phase depends on the deliverables of the previous one. The project begins with comprehensive requirements gathering and documentation, followed by system design, implementation, testing, deployment, and maintenance. In Microsoft Project, the task list includes:

- Requirements Analysis

- System Design

- Development

- Testing

- Deployment

- Maintenance

Each task is scheduled with specific durations, with dependencies establishing the precedence relationships—e.g., Development cannot start until Design is complete, and Testing follows Development. The Gantt chart visualizes these tasks linearly, emphasizing a planned and predictable progression. This model assumes stability in requirements and scope, which can create rigidity, potentially leading to delays if changes are needed later.

Agile Method Project Outline

Contrastingly, the Agile approach adopts an iterative and incremental process emphasizing flexibility, stakeholder collaboration, and responsiveness to change. In Microsoft Project, this outline breaks down the project into multiple sprints or iterations, each lasting a fixed time period (e.g., two weeks). Tasks include:

- Sprint Planning

- Sprint Development Cycles (multiple iterations)

- Sprint Review and Retrospective

- Integration and Deployment

Each sprint incorporates planning, development, testing, and review, allowing the team to adapt based on feedback and changing requirements. The Gantt chart here is more fluid, illustrating overlapping tasks and iterative cycles rather than a strict linear sequence. Agile manages uncertainty by embracing change, prioritizing high-value features, and encouraging continuous stakeholder engagement, which reduces risks associated with evolving project scopes.

Differences Between the Waterfall and Agile Outlines

The primary difference between the two project outlines lies in their structure and flexibility. The Waterfall model’s linear and sequential nature ensures clarity and straightforward scheduling but lacks adaptability. Changes late in the project can be costly and disruptive, making it less suitable for complex or innovative projects with uncertain requirements.

In contrast, Agile’s iterative cycles facilitate ongoing reassessment and re-prioritization, making it inherently more responsive to change. Agile explicitly addresses complexity and uncertainty by fostering collaboration, frequent testing, and incremental delivery—allowing teams to identify issues early and adapt quickly. For example, if user feedback indicates a need for significant alterations, Agile teams can incorporate these changes in subsequent sprints without disrupting the entire project plan. This approach reduces risk, enhances customer satisfaction, and improves the likelihood of delivering a product aligned with stakeholder expectations.

Conclusion

Both the Waterfall and Agile project outlines serve distinct purposes depending on project scope, complexity, and stakeholder involvement. While Waterfall offers a predictable, structured approach suitable for projects with fixed requirements, Agile provides a flexible, adaptive framework better suited to dynamic environments where requirements are likely to evolve. Understanding these differences is essential for project managers to select the appropriate methodology, especially when dealing with complex software development projects like mobile applications.

References

• Royce, W. (1970). Managing the Development of Large Software Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE WESCON, 26(8), 1-9.
• Scrum Alliance. (2021). The Scrum Guide. Retrieved from https://scrumguides.org.
• Highsmith, J. (2002). Agile Software Development: Principles, Patterns, and Practices. Addison-Wesley.
• Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile Software Development with Scrum. Prentice Hall.
• Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Business.
• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute.
• Chow, T., & Cao, D. (2008). A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 81(6), 961-971.
• Conforto, E., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., de Almeida, L. F. M., & di Tommaso, J. (2016). Contemporary trends in agile project management: A systematic review. Journal of Systems and Software, 117, 196-208.
• Retrieved from https://aspm.org.au/
• Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., et al. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Agile Alliance. Retrieved from https://agilemanifesto.org/.