Identify A Company In The News During The Last 12 Months

Identify A Company In The News During That Last 12 Months That Has Exp

Identify a company in the news during the last 12 months that has expressed what you believe to be a compelling vision for the future. Describe what you found particularly compelling about this vision and explain why you consider it to be a genuine vision rather than merely a marketing message. Consider this statement from a senior leader: “That is a behavior that needs to be rewarded but not promoted.” Envision and describe a scenario where an employee might have done something that prompted the senior leader to say this, and explain the rationale behind the leader's statement. Recognize that there is seldom a reward for playing it safe and not taking risks. If you want employees to take well-considered risks, how would you differentiate between “good” risk-taking that may not have the desired outcome and ill-considered mistakes? Finally, identify a job you have worked in and assess it using the Hackman and Oldham model. Compare and contrast your feelings about that job with the results from your assessment. List and prioritize what you consider the most effective aspects of this model and, for the least effective aspect, describe how it might be improved according to your perspective.

Paper For Above instruction

The modern corporate landscape is dynamic, requiring organizations to articulate compelling visions that inspire and guide their stakeholders through rapid change and competitive markets. One such corporation that has recently garnered attention is Tesla, Inc., renowned for its ambitious vision of accelerating the world’s transition to sustainable energy. Tesla's articulation of a future where renewable energy sources and electric vehicles dominate the global market exemplifies a compelling vision grounded in innovation, environmental responsibility, and technological advancement. The company's leadership, particularly Elon Musk, emphasizes not just profit or market share but a transformative future where humanity shifts towards sustainable energy solutions, which resonates deeply with stakeholders committed to environmental sustainability. This vision stands out not merely as a marketing slogan but as a strategic aspiration shaping Tesla’s ongoing investments, product development, and corporate culture. It embodies clarity, purpose, and a challenging yet achievable goal that inspires employees and investors alike.

In the realm of corporate leadership, statements like “That is a behavior that needs to be rewarded but not promoted” reflect nuanced management philosophies. This statement suggests that certain behaviors, such as innovative risk-taking or proactive problem-solving, should be recognized and incentivized without necessarily advancing the employee’s formal position within the organization. For instance, imagine an employee who, noticing a recurring safety issue, takes it upon themselves to develop a novel solution outside of formal procedures. Their initiative prevents a potential accident but does not directly lead to a promotion or official recognition; instead, their proactive approach is appreciated and rewarded through praise or a bonus. The rationale behind this statement is that rewarding valuable behaviors encourages continuous engagement and initiative without automatically endorsing all actions as part of career advancement, which might inadvertently discourage cautious or compliant behavior. Leaders aim to foster an environment where employees feel safe to experiment and take calculated risks without the pressure that every risk must be linked to a promotion.

Understanding the importance of risk management, it is crucial to distinguish between “good” risks and misguided mistakes. Good risks are well-calculated, align with strategic goals, and are based on thorough analysis, even if they do not always succeed. These are opportunities where innovative approaches could result in significant benefits or learning. Conversely, ill-considered mistakes often stem from impulsiveness or insufficient planning, leading to avoidable setbacks. To articulate this to employees, leaders should emphasize the value of deliberate risk assessment and learning from failures. For example, they might communicate that “good” risk-taking involves asking: Is this aligned with our core objectives? Do I understand the potential outcomes and mitigations? If the risk does not produce the desired result, it can still serve as a valuable learning experience, whereas careless mistakes highlight the need for better judgment and caution.

Looking at individual work experiences through the lens of Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model provides insight into job design and motivation. I previously worked as a customer service representative in a retail environment. Applying the model, I experienced high levels of task identity, as I handled complete customer transactions independently, which gave me a sense of ownership. The task significance was also evident, as my role directly impacted customer satisfaction and the store’s reputation. However, I found that skill variety was limited, as my tasks mainly involved routine procedures with minimal variation. The autonomy I experienced was moderate, as I followed strict guidelines but had some flexibility in handling customer interactions.

From my assessment, the most effective aspects of the model relate to task identity and task significance, which fostered a sense of purpose and personal accomplishment. These aspects motivated me to perform well despite moderate skill variety and autonomy. Conversely, the least effective aspect was the limited skill variety, which led to monotony over time. To improve this, I suggest incorporating more varied responsibilities, such as participating in inventory management or marketing initiatives, to enhance skill development and engagement. Increasing autonomy in decision-making could also foster greater intrinsic motivation and innovation among employees, aligning with the model’s emphasis on enriching job design.

References

• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
• Tesla. (2023). Our Mission. Retrieved from https://www.tesla.com/about
• Musk, E. (2017). Master plan, part deux. Tesla Blog. Retrieved from https://www.tesla.com/blog/master-plan-partDeux
• Hackman, J. R. (1980). Work redesign and motivation. California Management Review, 22(4), 23-32.
• Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action regulation of work and personal development. In H. C. Triandis (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 163-185). Oxford University Press.
• Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. John Wiley & Sons.
• Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39(11), 1005-1016.
• Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 463-479.