Identify An Industry You Are Familiar With Then Choose
Identifyan Industry With Which You Are Familiar Then Choose Two Busin
Identify an industry with which you are familiar, then choose two businesses in that industry. Identify the business model and types of ownership for each, and complete a Comparison of Businesses Matrix. Write a 525- to 700-word paper evaluating and comparing different components of each business's model after completing the matrix. Describe the benefits of each business by analyzing how they built a sustainable competitive advantage. Explain the advantages and disadvantages of each business's ownership. Format your paper according to APA guidelines and submit both your paper and the Business Matrix.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
In the dynamic landscape of contemporary commerce, understanding different business models and ownership structures offers vital insights into how organizations sustain competitive advantages. This paper explores two distinct businesses within the hospitality industry: Marriott International and Hilton Worldwide. By analyzing their business models and ownership forms, the paper aims to compare their strategies, benefits, and disadvantages, revealing how each firma cultivates sustainability and competitive edge.
Industry Selection and Business Overview
The hospitality industry remains a cornerstone of service-oriented commerce, emphasizing accommodations, customer experience, and brand loyalty. Marriott International and Hilton Worldwide are prominent players, each with extensive global footprints, diversified portfolios, and unique ownership strategies. The analysis of these two businesses provides valuable insights into how different business models operate within the same industry.
Business Models and Ownership Structures
Marriott International primarily operates under a franchise and management contract model. Its extensive hotel portfolio comprises owned, leased, franchised, and managed properties. Marriott's revenue streams are primarily derived from franchise fees, management fees, and leasing income. Ownership of physical properties is minimal, which reduces capital expenditure and allows scalability across various markets. The company maintains a mixed ownership structure, with a significant portion of properties owned outright and many operated via franchise agreements.
Hilton Worldwide also adopts a mixed-model approach, emphasizing management contracts and franchising, with a smaller proportion of owned hotels. Hilton earns revenue through franchise fees, management fees, and direct ownership of some properties. Its ownership structure is similar to Marriott's, characterized by a combination of leased, managed, and franchised properties, allowing flexibility and minimized capital risks.
Comparison via the Matrix:
| Component | Marriott International | Hilton Worldwide |
|---|---|---|
| Business Model | Franchising, management contracts | Franchising, management contracts |
| Ownership Type | Mixed (owned, leased, franchised, managed) | Mixed (leased, managed, franchised) |
| Revenue Sources | Franchise fees, management fees, lease income | Franchise fees, management fees, owned properties' income |
| Capital Investment | Low (mostly franchised/managed) | Similar, with some owned properties |
| Strategic Focus | Brand diversification, global expansion | Brand loyalty, digital innovation |
Evaluation and Comparison of Business Components
Both Marriott and Hilton rely heavily on franchising and management contracts, which provide operational flexibility and reduce capital expenditure. This model allows rapid global expansion while maintaining operational control and brand standards. Marriott's diverse portfolio and extensive franchising enable it to capitalize on emerging markets more quickly, fostering a sustainable competitive advantage through brand recognition and diversified revenue streams.
Hilton's emphasis on digital innovation and loyalty programs has contributed significantly to its competitive positioning. The Hilton Honors program enhances customer retention, leading to a sustainable advantage through customer loyalty. Both companies' strategies of limited ownership minimize risk and capital requirements, facilitating scalability and resilience against market fluctuations.
Benefits and Building Sustainable Competitive Advantage
Marriott's diverse brand portfolio (e.g., Ritz-Carlton, Courtyard, Residence Inn) attracts a broad customer base, enabling the company to adapt to varying market needs while maintaining a reputation for quality. Its global footprint, combined with a focus on innovation and customer experience, fuels its competitive edge. Marriott's strategic focus on franchising allows rapid expansion, leveraging local entrepreneurs' knowledge.
Hilton's strengths include its robust loyalty program, which enhances customer stickiness and increases repeat bookings. The company's focus on technology integration, including mobile check-ins and personalized services, enhances guest experience and operational efficiency. Hilton's ability to balance owned and franchised properties ensures a steady revenue stream and mitigates risks associated with property ownership.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Ownership Structures
The ownership strategies of both Marriott and Hilton offer several advantages: reduced capital investment, flexibility in operations, scalability, and risk diversification. Franchising and management contracts allow rapid expansion without heavy capital commitments, making it easier to adapt to market shifts.
However, disadvantages include less control over franchisees, potential variability in service quality, and dependence on franchise partners' adherence to standards. Ownership of physical properties, although capital intensive, provides greater control and long-term asset appreciation, but it also entails higher financial risk and reduced flexibility amid market downturns.
Conclusion
Marriott International and Hilton Worldwide exemplify effective use of franchising and management contracts within the hospitality industry, balancing ownership, operational control, and strategic innovation to sustain competitive advantages. While their ownership models offer significant benefits in flexibility and risk management, they also pose challenges related to quality control and capital restrictions. Overall, both companies demonstrate how strategic business models and ownership structures can foster sustainable competitive advantages through brand diversification, technological innovation, and customer loyalty.
References
Barsky, J., & Parsa, H. G. (2014). Customer Satisfaction and Hospitality Industry Performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(2), 267–286.
Brooks, R. (2020). The Business of Hospitality Management. Routledge.
Chen, S., & Zhang, Y. (2018). A Study of Franchise Business Models in the Hospitality Industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 27(3), 310–324.
Gerrard, D., & Mudge, S. (2016). Hospitality Law: Managing Legal Issues in the Hospitality Industry. Wiley.
Hollensen, S. (2015). Marketing Management: A Relationship Approach. Pearson.
Jin, B., & Lee, J. (2019). Innovation Strategies in Hospitality: The Case of Hilton Hotels. Tourism Management Perspectives, 31, 100–107.
Kyle, R., & Kenyon, S. (2021). Strategic Management in Hospitality and Tourism. Cengage Learning.
Taplin, R. (2017). Franchising and Licensing in Hospitality. Journal of Business Models, 5(2), 78–94.
Vinh, T. T. (2016). Ownership Structures and Business Performance in International Hospitality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 21–30.
Wong, K. K. F., & Li, X. (2020). Digital Transformation and Customer Loyalty in the Hotel Industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(4), 1505–1524.