Identify And Briefly Describe A Real-Life Organization Conse

Identify And Briefly Describe A Real Life Organization Consider U

(1) Identify and briefly describe a real-life organization (consider using an organization with which you have been involved) that uses both human relations and human resources principles. (2) How does it use these principles and what is the effect on productivity and worker satisfaction? Is one approach more beneficial than the other? (3) Describe the pros and cons of human relations and human resources management in the organization you selected.

Paper For Above instruction

In this paper, I will examine a real-life organization that effectively integrates both human relations and human resources principles to foster a productive and satisfying work environment. The organization I have chosen for this analysis is a midsized technology firm, which I have previously been involved with as an intern. This company has cultivated an environment that emphasizes employee well-being, participative management, and strategic HR practices to drive organizational success.

The organization employs human relations principles by prioritizing interpersonal relationships, employee engagement, and motivation. Managers frequently conduct informal check-ins and team-building activities aimed at fostering camaraderie and understanding among staff. The company also encourages open communication channels, allowing employees to voice concerns and suggestions without fear of reprisal. These initiatives are rooted in the human relations approach, which recognizes that social and psychological needs significantly impact employee satisfaction and performance.

The integration of these principles has yielded positive outcomes. Employee satisfaction surveys indicate high levels of morale and commitment. The emphasis on relational management fosters a supportive culture, reducing turnover and absenteeism. Productivity has increased as motivated employees are more engaged and committed to organizational objectives. Furthermore, by aligning HR practices with strategic business goals, the organization ensures that its human capital contributes effectively to its competitive advantage.

Regarding which approach is more beneficial, it appears that human resources management offers a more structured and strategic pathway for organizational growth. However, the human relations approach enhances this strategy by ensuring that employees feel valued and connected, thereby increasing commitment and reducing resistance to change. Thus, a balanced integration of both approaches is more advantageous than reliance on either method alone.

The advantages of the human relations approach include fostering a positive work environment, enhancing team cohesion, and boosting morale, which collectively lead to higher productivity. Conversely, its limitations involve the risk of prioritizing employee happiness at the expense of organizational efficiency if not properly aligned with business objectives. On the other hand, the human resources approach provides clear frameworks for managing workforce performance and development, ensuring organizational objectives are met. Yet, it may sometimes neglect the human element by focusing excessively on policies and procedures, potentially leading to employee dissatisfaction or burnout.

In conclusion, the successful organization I studied demonstrates that integrating human relations and human resources principles creates a synergistic effect that enhances productivity and employee satisfaction. Striking a balance between relational management and strategic HR practices is essential for fostering a motivated, capable, and engaged workforce, which ultimately drives sustainable organizational success.

References

• Armstrong, M. (2021). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (15th ed.). Kogan Page.
• Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. Macmillan.
• Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers.
• Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
• Ulrich, D., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2015). Are we there yet? What's next for HR? Human Resource Management, 54(2), 227-234.
• Greiner, L. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(4), 55-67.
• Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World Publishing Company.
• Dessler, G. (2020). Human Resource Management (15th ed.). Pearson.
• Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2019). Management (14th ed.). Pearson.
• Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management. Palgrave Macmillan.