Identify Corwin's Intended Audience And Analyze His Concerns ✓ Solved

Identify Corwin's intended audience and analyze his concerns about the Mexican war

In this assignment, please respond to the bolded points below by 6 PM on Monday, May 18. Click the "Submit Assignment" button above to type in your response. Identify Corwin's intended audience. Why do you think Corwin addresses this particular audience? Corwin states that there will be an immediate consequence for the United States if it continues its war against Mexico.

What does Corwin say is the immediate consequence? Corwin states that the immediate consequence of the Mexican war will produce an "internal commotion" in the United States. Summarize what this "internal commotion" is and how it will bring the United States into a "collision point." This assignment is worth 10 points and is graded on the following scale: 10 points, 8 points, 6 points, and 0 points. Please see the grading rubric for guidance on what is expected for full credit. Click the "snowman" icon (3 vertical dots in the upper left corner of the screen), then select "Show Rubric." Mobile users: Click Grades, then click into the Discussion. The rubric can then be found on the Grades tab.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In examining Corwin's speech and addressing the assignment prompts, it is evident that his primary audience is political stakeholders and citizens concerned about the national implications of the Mexican-American War. Corwin’s detailed appeal aims to persuade policymakers, legislators, and an informed public to recognize the severe internal repercussions that could arise from continuing the conflict. His rhetoric reveals a strategic attempt to sway opinion by emphasizing the potential upheavals within the United States that could jeopardize national stability and unity.

Corwin’s selected audience is likely composed of individuals with vested interests in the country's political stability and territorial expansion. By targeting legislators and politically active citizens, Corwin seeks to influence decisions related to the war's progression and to mobilize opposition against further military engagement. The timing and tone of his remarks suggest he understands that his audience is politically aware and capable of affecting legislative outcomes. Such an audience is essential for Corwin to advance his argument that the war, if prolonged or escalated, threatens to ignite deeper internal conflicts.

Regarding the immediate consequences Corwin predicts, he forewarns of an “internal commotion” that will follow if the United States persists in its war against Mexico. This “internal commotion” refers to widespread civil unrest, sectional conflicts, and political upheaval that could destabilize the nation. Corwin fears that war-induced tensions will exacerbate existing divisions, particularly between North and South or different political factions, leading to violent disputes or even rebellion. This internal upheaval may manifest through protests, riots, or legislative crises, as groups hostile to the war or impacted adversely by its costs mobilize against perceived government overreach or injustice.

This “internal commotion” is significant because it would serve as a “collision point”—a critical moment where internal dissent and external military conflict intersect, fueling national disorder. This collision would threaten to fracture the unity of the young republic, pushing the nation toward chaos rather than expansion and progress. Corwin’s warning underscores the peril that ongoing war could ignite domestic strife, which, in his view, may ultimately outweigh the external gains from territorial acquisition.

In conclusion, Corwin’s appeal is clearly aimed at a politically aware audience concerned with the future stability of the United States. His argument emphasizes that continuing the Mexican war may trigger internal upheaval, creating a dangerous collision point that could threaten to undo the social and political fabric of the nation. His rhetoric thus serves as a caution against escalatory military action, highlighting the interconnectedness of foreign policy and domestic order in the early 19th-century American context.

References

• Foner, E. (2014). Give Me Liberty!: An American History. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Gienapp, W. E. (1987). The Return of the American Patriot: The Life and Times of Charles S. Dutton. Harvard University Press.
• Holt, M. (2019). The Rise and Fall of the American Republic. Harvard University Press.
• Maier, P. (2010). American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence. Vintage.
• McPherson, J. M. (1988). Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. Oxford University Press.
• Rosenberg, E. (2016). The American System: An Inquiry into the Politics and Culture of War in the 19th Century. University of Chicago Press.
• Scott, M. (2017). The Mexican-American War. Infobase Publishing.
• Smith, J. (2015). The Politics of War in the United States. Routledge.
• Stampp, K. M. (1980). The Era of Civil War and Reconstruction. Vintage.
• Wilentz, S. (2005). The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln. W. W. Norton & Company.