Identify Potential And Actual Risks Evidenced In The Text

Identify potential and actual risks that are evidenced in this email. Then develop a risk assessment which includes your assessment of the risks of: 1. Supplier Relationship 2. Information sharing 3. Performance 4. HR 5. Disruption sources 6. Financial Question 2: Do this case Using Teams at the Engineered Materials Business Unit

Assignment instructions: Analyze the email from Anil Patel regarding the sourcing from Golden Elephant castings in India, identifying potential and actual risks evidenced in the email. Develop a comprehensive risk assessment covering the following areas: supplier relationship, information sharing, performance, HR, disruption sources, and financial risks. Subsequently, apply the case of the Engineered Materials Business Unit of Consolidated Products to discuss how team members’ commitment can be encouraged through employee performance evaluation and reward systems. Explore how teams should establish goals, the importance of team goals, characteristics of effective team leaders, and the resources and training necessary for successful cross-functional sourcing teams.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The case of sourcing from Golden Elephant castings in India, as described in the email, presents multiple layers of potential and actual risks that require careful identification and assessment. These risks span across supplier relationships, information sharing, performance, human resources, disruption sources, and financial stability. A nuanced understanding of these risks ensures proactive measures to mitigate potential adverse impacts on the supply chain, operational performance, and financial outcomes.

Risks in the Supplier Relationship

Firstly, the supplier’s recent management change raises concerns about the stability and reliability of the relationship. The owner’s gloating attitude about the profitability of the deal suggests a potential lack of long-term strategic planning and perhaps complacency, which could jeopardize future cooperation. The supplier’s "lock" on the business due to their unique heat-treatment capabilities indicates a high dependency, increasing the risk of supplier over-reliance. Additionally, the owner’s assertion that workers are overpaid, coupled with a practice of keeping workers "in the dark," indicates potential issues with worker morale and transparency that could threaten ongoing supplier stability. The youthfulness of technical staff and high turnover further exacerbate risks related to technical competency and institutional knowledge, which are critical for maintaining quality standards.

Information Sharing Risks

There is limited evidence of formal statistical quality control mechanisms, as noted by the absence of control charts, despite owner assurances. This lack of transparency and formal documentation could hinder effective communication about quality issues, leading to misalignment in quality standards. Moreover, the supplier’s tendency to shop around for the lowest steel prices and deal with spot prices orally suggests a risk of incomplete or inconsistent information sharing. Such practices complicate forecasting, planning, and quality assurance, potentially leading to delays or surprises in supply chain operations.

Performance Risks

The supplier’s current condition presents risks related to performance reliability. The reliance on inexperienced personnel, like the newly hired engineer, raises questions about consistent product quality and process control. Additionally, rumors of union problems at the port could cause delays or disruptions in shipment, affecting delivery schedules. The potential shipping delays due to increased fuel prices and uncommitted quotes further threaten on-time performance. The absence of statistical quality control reports and high turnover hint at potential future inconsistencies in product quality and supplier capacity.

Human Resources (HR) Risks

The owner’s remark about overpaid workers and efforts to keep them "in the dark" point to HR transparency and labor morale issues. Employee dissatisfaction or low engagement could result in increased turnover or subpar performance. The newly recruited technical staff may lack institutional memory or experience, affecting process stability and innovation. The owner’s outsourcing and cost-cutting motives may lead to labor conflicts or reduced workforce motivation, risking operational disruptions.

Disruption Sources

Disruption risks include supply chain interruptions due to port labor disputes, rumors of union problems, steel shortages caused by global high demand, and transportation delays inflated by rising fuel prices. These sources could compromise the timeliness and cost of delivery to Omaha, California, and beyond. The reliance on a single trucking family-owned operation introduces additional vulnerability, especially if external factors affect the trucking company's operations.

Financial Risks

Financial risks encompass potential cost overruns due to shipping delays, fluctuating fuel prices, and uncertain shipping margins. The supplier’s willingness to provide quotes based on spot prices indicates exposure to market volatility. Moreover, the high initial revenue forecast ($50M in Year 1, increasing to $75M) amplifies the financial stakes; any disruptions could significantly impact revenue projections and profitability, especially given the supplier’s apparent limited capacity for quality control and operational stability.

Application to the Engineered Materials Business Unit Case

Transitioning to the second case involving the Engineered Materials Business Unit, the importance of effective team management becomes evident. The unit’s struggle with cross-functional teams highlights the need for fostering employee engagement through performance evaluations and rewards. Aligning employee incentives with team objectives encourages support and ownership of collective goals. For instance, recognizing contributions through bonuses, promotions, or public acknowledgment can motivate team members to participate actively and commit to team success.

Establishing clear and measurable goals is fundamental in creating focused and cohesive teams. Goals should be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound (SMART). For example, targeting a 15% cost reduction or a specific productivity improvement within a set timeframe provides clarity and direction. The importance of team goals lies in guiding behavior, fostering accountability, and enabling progress measurement, which ultimately leads to improved performance and morale.

Effective team leadership plays a pivotal role in cross-functional success. Characteristics of an effective leader include strong communication skills, emotional intelligence, decisiveness, and the ability to foster collaboration and trust. Leaders must also possess technical knowledge relevant to the team’s tasks and be capable of facilitating constructive conflict resolution. Cross-functional leaders, specifically, need to understand diverse functional perspectives, manage resources effectively, and align team efforts with organizational objectives.

Providing appropriate resources and training is essential for team success. Resources may include access to advanced tools, relevant information, management support, and sufficient time allocation for team activities. Training should encompass team-building, conflict management, technical skill development, and understanding of organizational goals. For example, the Engineered Materials team would benefit from training in project management, communication, and problem-solving to enhance their collaboration and effectiveness.

In conclusion, managing risks in sourcing decisions and fostering effective cross-functional teams are critical for organizational success. Both require strategic planning, clear communication, supportive leadership, and resource allocation. By addressing these areas proactively, organizations can mitigate potential failures and cultivate high-performing teams that drive innovation and competitive advantage.

References

• Thomas, L. (2018). Supply Chain Risk Management: Resilience and Risk in Supply Chains. Kogan Page.
• Crawford, L. (2017). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Kerzner, H. (2019). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• Harvard Business Review. (2019). Building Effective Cross-Functional Teams. HBR.org.
• Edmondson, A. (2014). Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy. Jossey-Bass.
• Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press.
• Brown, S. (2015). Human Resource Management. Pearson.
• Simons, R. L. (2014). Levers of Organizational Change. Harvard Business School Publishing.
• Vogt, E. & Sheckley, B. (2018). Managing Supply Chain Risk. Supply Chain Management Review.
• Salas, E. et al. (2015). Building High-Reliability Organizations through Teamwork and Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology.