Identify Root Causes From The Mobile Investigation

Identify Root Causes From The Mobile Investigation

Assignment Rubric Identify Root Causes From The Mobile InvestigationAssignment Rubric - Identify Root Causes from the Mobile Investigations Project Scenario A root cause has been identified for each risk. 3 The root causes have meaningful content and are relevant to the associated risk. 5 The text is grammatically correct and there are no spelling or punctuation errors. 2 Total 10 Assignment Rubric – Identify three risks, risk categories, and mitigation strategies using the Amusement Park Ride project scenario A total of three risks have been identified. The risks are relevant to the project scenario. 4 A risk category has been identified for each risk. The category is relevant to the risk. 4 At least one risk mitigation measure has been identified for each risk. The mitigation strategy presented is logical, clearly described, and is relevant to the risk presented. 10 The text is grammatically correct and there are no spelling or punctuation errors. 2 Total 20 Scenario for Advanced Issues in Risk Management PGMT 530 Individual Weekly Assignment, Topic 5 You work for the IT organization in an American company that owns and manages five family-oriented theme parks under a well known brand in the Midwest. The flagship, original park is situated on a stunning 6,000 acre lot on a hill overlooking a large, beautiful lake. You have been working in the company as a software developer, and you have had some success on projects involving migrating software to new versions, moving to cloud services, and addressing difficult technical issues in a variety of technology areas in the company. Most important, you are becoming known for your “people” skills, dealing well with emotional customers under stressful situations.

You don’t really know what that means. After all, you are just doing your job. You have a reasonable expectation that in the next few years, you will be promoted to oversee a team of developers in the data center. One day in late February you are called in to a meeting with the CIO for the company (your boss’s boss). It is a little alarming because you have never had a conversation with this lady, only saying “Hi” to her as she passed by in the hallway.

You are then pleased to learn that she has heard good things about your work, and surprised when she assigns you to be the project manager for a project aimed at building a mobile application to help the park customers get directions in real time to the various thrill rides and get an estimated number of minutes they might have to wait in line to take each ride. She hints that if you do well, you will be on a management fast track. The CIO is very excited about the new app, in large part because other theme parks, like Hersheypark, Busch Gardens and Disneyworld have already started to work on their own mobile apps. The potential downside of this assignment is that she does not say you are able to work full time on the project.

Apparently your current work on other projects and service issues continues. It’s your problem, not hers. The CIO wants to make a big splash by unveiling the new mobile app on the opening day for all five theme parks, which is always scheduled on Mother’s Day, May 11. The CIO does not seem to be too worried abut the short time to implementation. She tells you that she has already identified a small firm in Palo Alto, in southern California.

Turns out the head of the firm was a mentor for her when she started her career after attending Stanford University. “This is a pretty straightforward turn-key application,” she says casually. ASSIGNMENT: Identify three risks, then describe mitigation measures you would take to prevent each risk from occurring (or lessening their impact). Use at least 200 words for each risk. Risk 1 [Insert Name of Risk] [Insert Category: Scope, Resource or Schedule] [Insert Mitigation measure(s)] Risk 2 [Insert Name of Risk] [Insert Category: Scope, Resource or Schedule] [Insert Mitigation measure(s)] Risk 3 [Insert Name of Risk] [Insert Category: Scope, Resource or Schedule] [Insert Mitigation measure(s)] 1 Sheet1 Risk, Threat Business Priority Risk Management Strategy Status Risk Category EdUravic 2013: EdUravic 2013: Scope, schedule or resource Impact Occurrence Probability Rank Root Cause Mitigation Activities Contingency Assigned to: 1 Unplanned requirements are added during the project 0.00 [insert date, then status report] 2 More defects discovered during testing than anticipatied with the new technology 0.00 [insert date, then status report] 3 Resources not available due to re-assignment to other priority projects 0.00 [insert date, then status report] 4 Delay and missed deadines due to imposed deadline 0.00 [insert date, then status report] 5 Team member loss to the project due to resignation, promotion, reassignment, health, or other reasons 0.00 [insert date, then status report] 6 Lack of team buy-in 0.00 [insert date, then status report] &"Arial,Italic"&16[Insert Project Name]_x000D_&9Last Updated: [insert date]&16_x000D_&14Risk Log &F &P Sheet2 Sheet3

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario of developing a mobile app for a major amusement park chain presents significant risk management challenges that must be meticulously addressed to ensure project success. The tight timeline, technological uncertainties, and stakeholder dependencies necessitate a comprehensive analysis to identify potential risks, their root causes, and effective mitigation strategies. This paper discusses three critical risks associated with this project: schedule risk stemming from an aggressive deadline, resource risk due to limited availability of qualified personnel, and scope creep driven by unanticipated requirements.

Risk 1: Schedule Risk due to Tight Deadline

The primary risk associated with the project is the schedule risk, which arises from the ambitious deadline of launching the mobile application by Mother’s Day, May 11. The CIO's expectation for a quick turnaround, coupled with the decision to outsource development to a small firm in California, intensifies this risk. The root cause of this schedule risk lies in the overly optimistic project timeline that underestimates the complexity of app development, testing, and deployment within a limited window. Additionally, relying on a third-party vendor with known mentor relationships and perhaps limited experience with similar projects can further threaten timely delivery.

Mitigation measures to address schedule risk include developing a detailed project schedule with clear milestones, contingency plans, and buffer time for unforeseen delays. Establishing rigorous project management practices such as regular progress reviews and milestone tracking ensures early identification of schedule slippages. Furthermore, adopting an agile development approach can facilitate incremental delivery and early detection of issues, allowing for adjustments without jeopardizing the overall timeline. Close coordination with the outsourced firm through regular meetings and status updates is essential to maintain momentum and address potential bottlenecks proactively.

Risk 2: Resource Risk from Limited Availability of Skilled Personnel

Another significant risk involves resource availability, particularly the limited availability of key skilled personnel, given that the project is not the main focus of the current team. The project manager must depend partly on existing staff and the external vendor, which introduces the risk that essential expertise or personnel may be unavailable due to commitments elsewhere or re-allocation to pressing priorities. The root cause of this risk is inadequate resource planning and lack of dedicated personnel allocated specifically to the project, which can delay development stages or compromise quality.

To mitigate resource risk, a strategic resource management plan should be implemented. This includes early identification of critical skills needed and securing commitments from internal staff and external vendors for dedicated availability throughout the project duration. Cross-training team members ensures that knowledge is distributed, reducing reliance on single points of failure. Additionally, establishing clear communication channels and expectations with the external vendor helps ensure they understand the urgency and importance of timely deliverables. In case of resource conflicts, having backup personnel or alternative vendors identified in advance can minimize delays and maximize project continuity.

Risk 3: Scope Creep and Unanticipated Requirements

The third prominent risk is scope creep, which can occur when unanticipated requirements or changes are added mid-project due to evolving stakeholder expectations or misunderstandings. The root cause of scope creep is often insufficient initial requirements analysis and stakeholder management, making it difficult to control the project boundaries. Scope creep can lead to missed deadlines, increased costs, and compromised quality, especially within a constrained timeframe.

Mitigating scope creep entails establishing a comprehensive scope definition during project initiation, including detailed scope statements and agreed-upon deliverables. Implementing a formal change management process allows stakeholders to request changes but ensures they are evaluated, prioritized, and approved systematically. Regular stakeholder engagement and transparent communication help align expectations and reduce the likelihood of significant scope modifications. Additionally, adopting an incremental development process allows the team to deliver working features periodically, providing opportunities for feedback and scope adjustments within controlled parameters, thereby minimizing disruptive changes later in the project.

Overall, addressing these risks proactively with targeted mitigation strategies enhances the likelihood of delivering a successful mobile application on time and within scope, ultimately supporting the company's strategic objectives and customer satisfaction initiatives.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• PMBOK Guide. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Heldman, K. (2018). PMP Exam Practice Test and Study Guide. Wiley.
• Chapman, C., & Ward, S. (2011). How to Manage Project Opportunity and Risk. Wiley.
• Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2020). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Williams, T. (2017). Risk Management in Projects. Project Management Journal, 48(4), 22-33.
• Standish Group. (2020). Chaos Report: Success and Failure in Software Projects. The Standish Group.
• ISO 21500:2012. (2012). Guidance on project management. International Organization for Standardization.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.