Identify The Research Questions For This Study

Identify The Research Questions For This Studythe Obj

Week 5 collapseidentify The Research Questions For This Studythe Obj

Week 5collapseidentify The Research Questions For This Studythe Obj

Week 5 COLLAPSE Identify the research question(s) for this study. The objective of this study according to the authors Sibeoni et al. (2018), is to examine the factors that influence the quality of life for cancer patients during their active treatment. The study has a specific goal of understanding the positive and negative factors that affect the daily lives of patients during treatment. It focuses on the adverse effects of the treatment and the utilization of supportive objects, the evaluation of the effects of the cancer treatment, and the positive impacts of relationships. Provide a critique of the research design.

Paper For Above instruction

The research questions guiding Sibeoni et al.'s (2018) study primarily focus on understanding the multifaceted factors that influence the quality of life among cancer patients undergoing active treatment. Specifically, the study aims to explore what positive and negative factors affect patients' daily experiences, with particular attention to adverse effects of treatment, supportive objects or activities, and the role of relationships in patient well-being. By addressing these areas, the researchers seek to identify key elements that either hinder or facilitate patients' ability to cope during their treatment journey.

The primary research question can be articulated as: "What are the factors that influence the quality of life for cancer patients during active treatment?" Secondary questions may include: "How do adverse effects of treatment impact daily functioning and well-being?" "What supportive objects or activities do patients employ to cope with treatment-related challenges?" and "In what ways do relationships contribute positively or negatively to patients' overall quality of life?" These questions collectively enable a comprehensive understanding of the complex experience of cancer patients during treatment, addressing both physiological and psychosocial dimensions.

Critiquing the research design, Sibeoni et al. (2018) employed a qualitative, phenomenological approach which is well-suited to capturing the lived experiences of cancer patients. This design facilitates depth of understanding and highlights subjective interpretations, making it appropriate for exploring complex, personal phenomena such as quality of life during treatment. The use of purposive sampling with maximum variation ensured diversity among participants, thereby enhancing the richness and transferability of findings.

The choice of thematic analysis as a method for analyzing data supports the identification of overarching patterns and themes, which is beneficial for understanding commonalities across individual experiences. The inclusion of experienced qualitative researchers, including psychologists and psychiatrists, likely strengthened data collection and analysis, increasing the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings. Ethical considerations such as informed consent and rigorous reporting practices further add to the robustness of the study.

Nonetheless, there are limitations to consider. The study's context within the French healthcare system and cultural environment may influence the transferability of findings to other settings. Moreover, qualitative research inherently relies on subjective interpretation, which can introduce researcher bias, though this has been mitigated through systematic analysis and peer discussions.

Overall, the research design is adeptly aligned with the study’s objectives, providing detailed insights into patients' lived experiences, though future research could benefit from combining qualitative and quantitative methods to deepen understanding and facilitate broader generalization.

Discussion of Implications, Suggestions, and Additional Insights

The findings of Sibeoni et al. (2018) carry significant implications for clinical practice, particularly for oncology nursing and psychosocial support services. Recognizing the importance of supportive objects and activities as coping mechanisms suggests that healthcare providers should routinely assess patients' personal resources and preferences. Incorporation of such assessments into routine care could personalize interventions, enhance patient engagement, and potentially improve quality of life outcomes.

Furthermore, emphasizing the patient's subjective evaluation of treatment effectiveness indicates a need for shared decision-making models that value patient perspectives. Clinicians, especially nurses, should foster open communication to understand patients' perceptions and experiences, which may influence adherence to treatment and overall satisfaction.

From a research standpoint, these findings underscore the necessity for longitudinal studies to explore how support systems and psychosocial factors evolve throughout the treatment trajectory. Quantitative research could quantify the impact of specific supportive objects or activities on treatment outcomes and quality of life. Additionally, intervention studies could test the efficacy of tailored psychosocial support programs targeting identified factors.

To enhance future research, adopting mixed-methods designs could bridge the depth of qualitative insights with the generalizability of quantitative data. Furthermore, expanding research to diverse cultural settings would allow for cross-cultural comparisons, reducing the potential bias stemming from cultural influences identified in the French context.

Overall, integrating these insights into practice involves fostering holistic, patient-centered care that addresses psychological, social, and cultural factors influencing treatment experiences. Establishing multidisciplinary teams dedicated to psychosocial support, including psychologists, social workers, and nurses, could improve the effectiveness of interventions and enhance overall patient well-being during the arduous journey of cancer treatment.

References

• Sibeoni, J., Picard, C., Orri, M., et al. (2018). Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer, 18, 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-3983-8