Identify The Subject, Predicator, Complement, And Adjunct In
Iidentify The Subject Predicator Complement And Adjunct In Each Of
Iidentify The Subject Predicator Complement And Adjunct In Each Of
I. Identify the subject, predicator, complement, and adjunct in each of the following clauses . (2.5 Points) 1- I couldn't find the word in the dictionary. 2- Fog and ice are making the roads very dangerous. 3- Her husband was driving the car at the time of the accident. 4- Many residents must travel long distances to a grocery store. 5- He is a distinguished professor of law at the University of Illinois. There are TWO tests for elements of clause structure. Explain in detail and support your answer with examples.
Paper For Above instruction
Understanding the Elements of Clause Structure: Subject, Predicator, Complement, and Adjunct
Language is constructed around clauses, which are units of meaning that encompass a subject and a predicate. To analyze sentence structure systematically, linguists identify key elements within clauses: the subject, predicator, complement, and adjunct. Each of these elements plays a distinct role in conveying meaning and facilitating grammatical coherence. Additionally, understanding the tests for clause elements deepens our comprehension of how sentences are formed and interpreted.
Defining the Clause Elements
Subject: The subject is typically a noun phrase (NP) that the clause is about. It often indicates who or what performs the action or is described.
Predicator: Also called the verb or verb phrase, it expresses action, state, or occurrence. It is the core of the predicate.
Complement: A complement completes the meaning of the predicator and is often necessary to complete the thought. It can be a noun phrase, adjective, or clause.
Adjunct: An adjunct provides additional information such as time, place, manner, or reason. It is usually optional and can be omitted without affecting the grammaticality of the sentence.
Analyzing Sample Sentences
1. I couldn't find the word in the dictionary.
Subject: I
Predicator: couldn't find
Complement: the word
Adjunct: in the dictionary
This sentence demonstrates how the subject 'I' performs the action of finding, with 'the word' completing the action, and 'in the dictionary' providing additional locational information.
2. Fog and ice are making the roads very dangerous.
Subject: Fog and ice
Predicator: are making
Complement: the roads (which are very dangerous)
Adjunct: (none explicitly, but 'very dangerously' acts as an adverbial modifier)
The subject here is compound, and 'are making' is the action, with 'the roads' as the direct object being described.
3. Her husband was driving the car at the time of the accident.
Subject: Her husband
Predicator: was driving
Complement: the car
Adjunct: at the time of the accident
This sentence features a subject performing the action with a directly affected object, and the adjunct 'at the time...' specifies when.
4. Many residents must travel long distances to a grocery store.
Subject: Many residents
Predicator: must travel
Complement: long distances
Adjunct: to a grocery store
The adjunct indicates destination, adding spatial context.
5. He is a distinguished professor of law at the University of Illinois.
Subject: He
Predicator: is
Complement: a distinguished professor of law
Adjunct: at the University of Illinois
The complement describes his role, and the adjunct specifies location.
Two Tests for Elements of Clause Structure
Determining the functions of elements within a clause can be achieved via specific tests. Two primary tests are:
1. Substitutability Test
This involves replacing a potential element with a pronoun or other suitable substitute. If the sentence retains grammaticality and meaning, the element likely serves a particular structural role. For example, replacing 'the word' with 'it' in the first sentence:
"I couldn't find it in the dictionary."
Since the sentence remains sound, 'the word' functions as a noun phrase object, likely a complement.
2. Movement Test
This assesses whether an element can be moved within the sentence without altering grammaticality, indicating its structural role. For instance, moving the adjunct 'in the dictionary' to the beginning:
"In the dictionary, I couldn't find the word."
This is acceptable, confirming 'in the dictionary' as an adjunct. If movement causes ungrammaticality or awkwardness, the element's function is confirmed.
Conclusion
Understanding clause structure elements enriches our grasp of language intricacies. The subject, predicator, complement, and adjunct each contribute uniquely to making sense of sentences. Tests like substitutability and movement serve as practical tools in analyzing and validating these elements. Mastery of these concepts enhances linguistic analysis, enabling clearer communication and better comprehension of syntactic patterns in English and other languages.
References
- Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold.
- Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.
- Huddleston, R., & Pullman, G. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.
- Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course. Heinle & Heinle.
- Radford, A. (2004). English Syntax: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
- Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to Theoretical Syntax. Cambridge University Press.
- Brinton, L. J. (2000). The Structure of Modern English: A syntactic analysis. Routledge.
- Adger, D. (2003). Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford University Press.
- Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Blackwell Publishing.