Identify The Tasks, Duration, And Resources To Be Done

Identify The Tasks Task Duration And Resources That Should Be Added

Identify the tasks, task duration, and resources that should be added or already exist in the project plan to monitor and control quality. Calculate the additional contingency or primary budget that has been set aside for these tasks. Discuss how you will use at least 2 of the following quality performance tools and techniques to perform monitoring and control: Cause and effect charts Control charts Benchmarking Flowcharting Histogram Pareto chart Run chart Scatter diagram Statistical sampling Inspection. Be sure to include a sample of this tool or technique in use.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective monitoring and controlling of quality within a project are foundational to delivering a successful outcome that meets stakeholder expectations. To achieve this, it is essential to identify specific tasks, the duration of these tasks, and the resources needed or already allocated to maintain quality standards. Additionally, understanding the budget implications and selecting suitable quality performance tools are critical components in ensuring robust quality management.

Identifying Tasks and Resource Allocation for Quality Monitoring and Control

The first step involves delineating specific activities aimed at quality assurance and control. These tasks include developing quality measurement criteria, conducting inspections, performing audits, and analyzing defect rates. For instance, implementing continuous process audits to detect deviations early and conducting supplier quality evaluations are vital tasks. The duration of these activities varies; inspections might be scheduled weekly, audits quarterly, and defect analysis a continuous process. Resources encompass skilled quality inspectors, process analysts, and necessary quality management systems.

Existing project plans might already include some of these tasks, such as routine inspections or supplier evaluations; however, additional tasks may be necessary based on the project's complexity. For example, real-time monitoring tools or increased frequency of quality audits could be introduced to catch deviations promptly, enhancing the overall quality control process.

Estimating Additional Budget and Contingencies

Allocating a contingency budget specifically for quality monitoring ensures preparedness for unforeseen issues. Typically, organizations reserve around 5% to 10% of the total project budget for quality-related activities, depending on the industry and project complexity. For example, if the primary budget is $1,000,000, an additional contingency of $50,000 to $100,000 might be set aside for enhanced quality activities, including advanced inspection tools, additional personnel, or training programs.

Application of Quality Performance Tools and Techniques

Two critical tools for monitoring and control are control charts and Pareto analysis. Control charts enable ongoing process performance tracking, detecting trends that suggest deviations before defects occur. For example, using an X-bar and R chart helps monitor process stability over time, and a sample control chart might look like plotting the average defect rate per week, allowing managers to spot abnormal variations proactively.

Pareto analysis, based on the Pareto principle, involves identifying the most significant causes of quality issues. By analyzing defect types, teams can focus on the few causes that contribute most to the problem, facilitating targeted improvements. For instance, if 80% of defects result from a handful of causes such as incorrect assembly or equipment malfunction, addressing these causes can substantially elevate overall quality.

Sample Implementation

A practical example involves applying control charts during a manufacturing process. Suppose a assembly line produces parts with a target dimension of 10 mm ± 0.2 mm. Using control charts, sample measurements are plotted over time, and any points outside control limits indicate process instability requiring action. Concurrently, a Pareto chart is used to analyze defect data, revealing that 70% of defects stem from misaligned machinery. Addressing this single issue could significantly reduce defects.

Conclusion

In sum, effective quality monitoring and control require identifying appropriate tasks, estimating necessary resources and budgets, and implementing suitable tools like control charts and Pareto analysis. These activities ensure early detection of issues, targeted process improvements, and ultimately, the delivery of high-quality project outcomes.

References

  • Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1999). Juran's Quality Handbook (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (8th ed.). Wiley.
  • ISO. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems — Requirements. International Organization for Standardization.
  • Oakland, J. S. (2014). Total Quality Management and Operational Excellence: text with cases. Routledge.
  • Goh, T. N., & Goh, T. T. (2009). Process Control: A Quality Control and Improvement Approach. Wiley.
  • Chiarini, R. (2013). Total Quality Management & Operational Excellence: Camfinding and Innovation in the 21st Century. Springer.
  • Dalal, D., & Sarda, A. (2013). Implementation of Control Charts for Quality Improvement. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 30(3), 292-305.
  • George, M. L. (2002). The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook. McGraw-Hill.
  • Feigenbaum, A. V. (1991). Total Quality Control. McGraw-Hill.
  • Shewhart, W. A. (1931). Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Related Assignments