Identify Two Claims In Each Video And Give A Detailed Explan

Identify Two Claims In Each Video And Give A Detailed Explanation Of

Identify two claims in each video and give a detailed explanation of how the evidence gives you the claims. Use the following questions to help you identify claims: -Who are they trying to persuade? How do you know who they are addressing? -How do they get their audience's attention? -Are there any opposing views? (Links to an external site.) (take me to church) (Links to an external site.) (king without a crown)

Paper For Above instruction

This paper aims to analyze two videos, namely "Take Me to Church" and "King Without a Crown," by identifying two central claims in each and exploring how the evidence presented in the videos supports these claims. The analysis will focus on understanding the target audience, the methods used to capture attention, and the presence or absence of opposing views, thus providing a comprehensive understanding of the persuasive strategies employed in these videos.

Introduction

Video content, especially in the realm of social and political commentary, often revolves around conveying compelling claims to influence public perception and opinions. Recognizing these claims and understanding the evidence backing them are crucial steps in critically engaging with any media. This analysis considers "Take Me to Church" by Hozier and "King Without a Crown" by Matisyahu, examining their claims, evidence, audiences, and persuasive techniques.

Analysis of "Take Me to Church"

Claim 1: The song criticizes institutionalized religion for promoting discrimination, particularly against LGBTQ+ individuals.

The evidence supporting this claim is rooted in the lyrics of the song, which depict religion as a force that fosters hate and violence. For instance, lyrics like "The church allows you to be gay" juxtapose the idea that religious doctrines often condemn or marginalize LGBTQ+ community members, thus suggesting a disconnect between spiritual love and institutionalized religion. The visual imagery in the music video further accentuates this point by showing scenes of discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ individuals, reinforcing the critique.

The target audience appears to be individuals disillusioned with or skeptical of organized religion, particularly those advocating for LGBTQ+ rights. Hozier employs emotional imagery and evocative lyrics to attract attention and evoke empathy, aiming to persuade viewers to question religious institutions' role in social injustice. The tone and visuals challenge institutional authority, fostering a critical perspective among viewers who seek social equality.

Claim 2: The song calls for compassion and human rights, emphasizing that love should transcend religious dogma.

The evidence for this claim is in the chorus and recurring themes emphasizing love and acceptance, such as "Love's no different than a sin." This suggests that love, regardless of sexual orientation, should be accepted and celebrated, countering religious condemnation. The emotional appeal is enhanced by the soulful delivery of the singer and the music's somber yet uplifting tone, which seeks to inspire compassion and moral reflection.

The audience for this message is anyone interested in social justice, human rights, and equality. The emotional and moral appeals are designed to resonate universally with viewers who believe in compassion and love as foundational human values. The video effectively employs visual symbolism, such as imagery of love and acceptance, to strengthen this message.

Analysis of "King Without a Crown"

Claim 1: The song portrays the artist as a spiritual figure who seeks to reconcile the struggles of life with a divine connection.

The evidence lies in the lyrics like "I'm a king without a crown" and "All I have is my soul," which suggest humility and a search for inner spiritual authority without reliance on material or institutional power. The artist emphasizes personal spirituality over traditional religious authority, positioning himself as a seeker of divine truth and connectivity.

The audience likely consists of individuals interested in spiritual self-discovery and authenticity. The song’s introspective tone and poetic lyrics attract listeners who value genuine spiritual experience over dogma. The evidence encouraging self-reflection is designed to persuade listeners towards personal spiritual awakening outside institutional confines.

Claim 2: The song emphasizes resilience and hope in the face of adversity, framing personal struggles as part of a divine plan.

The evidence includes lyrics like "Stand up for what you believe in," and "Hold your head up high," which promote resilience and optimism. These themes are supported by the uplifting melody and rhythm, which evoke a sense of strength and hope. The song encourages viewers to maintain faith and integrity despite life's challenges, portraying adversity as a pathway to spiritual growth.

The audience targeted here is individuals facing personal struggles or societal oppression. The emotional tone and encouraging lyrics serve to motivate resilience and a hopeful outlook, persuading listeners to see their struggles as meaningful and part of a divine journey.

Conclusion

Both "Take Me to Church" and "King Without a Crown" employ powerful claims grounded in emotional and visual evidence to connect with their audiences. The first challenges societal injustices associated with religious institutions, advocating for love and equality, while the second promotes personal spirituality, resilience, and hope. Analyzing these claims reveals the strategic use of evidence and rhetoric aimed at persuading specific audiences and challenging opposing views.

References

• Hozier. (2013). "Take Me to Church" [Music Video]. YouTube.
• Matisyahu. (2005). "King Without a Crown" [Music Video]. YouTube.
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Public Opinion. Political Behavior, 29(3), 215-242.
• Nelson, T. E. (2002). Political Information and Campaign Effects. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 329-356.
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
• Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109.
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217.
• McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
• Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media. Cambridge University Press.