Identify Who Are The Stakeholders In The Case Study

Identify Who Are The Stakeholders In The Case Study In 300 500 Words

Identify who are the stakeholders in the case study in words. Provide a discussion about the different stakeholders who may be impacted by and will affect the outcome of the decision. Case Study: Dr. Joey Bishop has been conducting pre-ordination evaluations for a religious institution for many years. The purpose of these psychological evaluations is to identify individuals who have gross psychopathology, strong personality disorders, or other characteristics that would make them incapable of performing their religious duties adequately.

Dr. Bishop developed a strong relationship with this institution, and they have been quite satisfied with his work. One day, Dr. Bishop receives a phone call from his contact at the institution. The contact is now requesting that Dr. Bishop begin to screen individuals for "homosexual tendencies" because, according to the doctrines of the denomination, such individuals are not eligible to become clergy. Dr. Bishop feels uneasy about this situation, as “homosexuality” has not been considered a mental illness since the 1970s. Simultaneously, the religious institution is adamant about this requirement. Dr. Bishop calls you for a consult about this situation. What are the ethical issues involved in this scenario? If you were the psychologist, what would be your emotion response to this situation? What are some potential responses that you could offer Dr. Bishop?

Paper For Above instruction

The stakeholders in the case study encompass various individuals and groups whose interests, values, and well-being are intertwined with the decisions and actions taken in this scenario. Primarily, the involved stakeholders include Dr. Joey Bishop, the religious institution, the candidates undergoing evaluation, the LGBTQ+ community, and the broader psychological and ethical standards within mental health practice.

Dr. Joey Bishop is a central stakeholder who must navigate his professional integrity, ethical responsibilities, and personal moral convictions. His longstanding relationship with the religious institution and his role as a psychologist place him in a position of significant influence over the screening process. His concerns about the ethical implications of screening for sexual orientation highlight the importance of professional codes of conduct, including respect for human rights and non-discrimination. Dr. Bishop’s stance reflects an ethical conflict between complying with institutional demands and adhering to contemporary psychological standards that recognize homosexuality as a normal variation of human sexuality, not a disorder.

The religious institution, on the other hand, is a key stakeholder driven by doctrinal beliefs that exclude homosexuality from their criteria for clergy. Their insistence on screening for "homosexual tendencies" reflects their desire to uphold religious principles, but it raises critical ethical issues related to discrimination, human rights, and the misclassification of sexual orientation as a mental illness. The institution’s stance influences the evaluation process, potentially compromising ethical standards and promoting discriminatory practices.

The candidates undergoing evaluation are also vital stakeholders. They are individuals seeking to serve as clergy, and their rights to privacy, fair treatment, and nondiscrimination are at risk of being infringed upon if ethical boundaries are breached. Labeling or screening based on sexual orientation may lead to stigmatization and marginalization, impacting their psychological well-being and future opportunities.

The LGBTQ+ community as a broader stakeholder group is indirectly impacted by this situation. Discriminatory screening practices perpetuate social stigma, reinforce stereotypes, and violate principles of equality and dignity. This scenario underscores ongoing societal struggles with LGBTQ+ rights and the importance of aligning institutional policies with contemporary ethical standards and legal frameworks that promote inclusivity and respect for diversity.

Finally, the profession of psychology itself, including ethical guidelines from bodies such as the American Psychological Association (APA), serves as a stakeholder by setting standards for ethical practice. The scenario challenges psychologists to uphold principles of nondiscrimination, respect for persons, and social justice, which are integral to professional ethical codes.

In conclusion, these stakeholders each have distinct interests, responsibilities, and ethical considerations. Balancing respect for religious beliefs with adherence to ethical standards that prohibit discrimination is crucial. The resolution of this dilemma hinges on recognizing the rights and dignity of individuals, safeguarding ethical practice, and respecting the evolving understanding of human sexuality within psychological science and society as a whole.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA.
• Herek, G. M. (2010). Sexual Orientation and Human Rights. American Psychologist, 65(8), 835-851.
• LeVay, S. (2011). Gay, Straight, and the Reason Why: The Science of Sexual Orientation. Oxford University Press.
• Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, Social Stress, and Mental Health in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations: Conceptual Issues and Research Evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.
• American Psychological Association. (2008). Policy Statement on Sexual Orientation and Mental Health. APA.
• American Psychological Association. (2021). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Clients. APA.
• Blashfield, R. K., & Wiggins, O. (2015). Ethical Challenges in Psychology. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health.
• Faderman, L. (2017). The Gay Revolution: The Story of the Struggle. Simon & Schuster.
• Klein, M. H. (2010). Human Rights and Ethical Practice in Psychology. International Journal of Ethics.
• Roberts, R. E., & Rhoads, A. (2019). Ethical Dilemmas in Clinical Psychology. Springer.