If AutoEdge Decided To Increase Its Prices And Return To The ✓ Solved

If AutoEdge Decided to Increase Its Prices and Return to the

The board of directors at AutoEdge is actively discussing options to address flagging revenue, including the potential relocation of manufacturing back to the United States. Chief Financial Officer Ingrid Adams is particularly interested in understanding how such a decision, combined with an increase in prices, would impact consumer demand, specifically in relation to the elasticity of demand for auto parts. This document aims to clarify the concept of elasticity in the context of AutoEdge's situation.

Understanding Elasticity of Demand

Elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of consumers to price changes for a particular good or service. There are primarily two types of elasticity relevant to this discussion: price elasticity of demand and income elasticity of demand. In the case of AutoEdge, we will focus on price elasticity of demand.

Price Elasticity of Demand

Price elasticity of demand (PED) is defined as the ratio of the percentage change in quantity demanded to the percentage change in price. The classification of elasticity can be grouped into several categories:

  • Relatively elastic: A PED greater than 1, indicating that a price increase leads to a proportionally larger decrease in quantity demanded.
  • Relatively inelastic: A PED less than 1, where a price increase does not significantly reduce the quantity demanded.
  • Unitary elastic: A PED equal to 1, indicating a proportional relationship between price changes and quantity demanded.
  • Perfectly elastic: A theoretical situation where consumers will only purchase at a specific price, and anything higher results in zero demand.
  • Perfectly inelastic: A hypothetical case where the quantity demanded remains the same regardless of price changes.

Elasticity of Auto Parts

Auto parts generally exhibit characteristics of relatively inelastic demand. This means that even if AutoEdge were to increase its prices in conjunction with relocating manufacturing to the U.S., the impact on consumer demand might not be significantly negative. Several factors contribute to this assessment:

1. Necessity of Auto Parts

For many consumers, auto parts are necessities. When vehicles break down or require parts for maintenance, consumers are often willing to pay higher prices to ensure their vehicles remain operational. This necessity drives the relatively inelastic nature of demand within this market segment.

2. Availability of Substitutes

While there are alternatives available for auto parts, such as aftermarket products, the distinctions in quality and compatibility can limit consumer switching. If AutoEdge's parts are known for reliability and performance, consumers may be less likely to turn to alternatives, even at higher prices, further indicating inelastic demand.

3. Brand Loyalty

AutoEdge may also have cultivated brand loyalty among its consumers. If customers trust AutoEdge products, they might prioritize purchasing auto parts from the company, regardless of price hikes associated with U.S. manufacturing. This loyalty can further reinforce the inelastic nature of demand.

4. Market Trends

Additionally, the broader economic climate can influence consumer behavior. In periods of economic stability or growth, consumers may be more willing to absorb higher prices for products they deem necessary, such as auto parts.

Conclusion

In summary, should AutoEdge decide to increase its prices while relocating manufacturing back to the United States, the demand for its auto parts is likely to remain relatively inelastic. This means that while price increases may impact sales to some extent, the overall effect on quantity demanded may not be drastic. This understanding will be essential for addressing shareholder concerns regarding revenue and consumer preferences.

References

  • Colander, D. C. (2016). Economics. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2018). Microeconomics. Worth Publishers.
  • Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of Microeconomics. Cengage Learning.
  • Tucker, I. B. (2017). Microeconomics for Today. Cengage Learning.
  • Sullivan, A., & Sheffrin, S. M. (2018). Economics: Principles in Action. Pearson.
  • Case, K. E., & Fair, R. C. (2017). Principles of Economics. Pearson.
  • Ruffin, R. C., & Gregory, M. (2020). Principles of Economics. Routledge.
  • Baumol, W. J., & Blinder, A. S. (2016). Microeconomics: Principles and Policy. Cengage Learning.
  • Bade, R., & Parkin, M. (2019). Foundations of Microeconomics. Pearson.

Related Assignments