If You Choose To Handle My Essay Please Make Sure Thi 558226

If You Choose To Handle My Essay Please Make Sure This Is100 Original

If you choose to handle my essay please make sure this is 100% original work. Here are my requirements of this essay: Word counts: words Format: This is going to be graded automatically by the system, so please provide a 5-paragraph format which includes an introduction, 3 paragraphs of discussion, and a conclusion. At the beginning of each paragraph, please clearly indicate main points of that paragraph. Contents: Please read the instruction carefully and answer all the questions. If you need any text readings, please let me know. Grammar: There should be as few grammar errors as possible. Quality: Please provide a 80%+ work. Instruction of this essay: Imagine a friend has just lost his job which helped him cover tuition costs. Apply Lazarus and Folkman's cognitive theory of stress and describe his potential reactions to this job loss. In your answer, be sure to describe the following: Stressful Event, Primary Appraisal, Secondary Appraisal, and Stress Response.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction: The experience of losing a job can be profoundly stressful, especially when that job is a primary source of financial support for vital needs such as tuition. Lazarus and Folkman’s cognitive theory of stress offers a comprehensive framework to understand how individuals appraise and respond to such stressful events. This essay will analyze a friend's reaction to losing his job by exploring the stages of stress appraisal and response, illustrating how he might perceive and cope with this life-changing event.

Main Point of Paragraph 1 – Stressful Event: The initial step in Lazarus and Folkman's model involves identifying the stressful event. In this scenario, the stressful event is the sudden loss of a job that provides necessary income for tuition and living expenses. This event is significant because it threatens the individual's financial stability and academic progress, creating a state of alarm and distress. The loss of employment not only signifies economic hardship but also impacts the individual’s self-esteem and future prospects, making it a profoundly stressful situation that warrants further cognitive processing.

Main Point of Paragraph 2 – Primary and Secondary Appraisal: The individual’s reaction depends heavily on the appraisal process. Primary appraisal involves evaluating whether the event poses a threat, challenge, or harm. In this case, the friend is likely to perceive the job loss as a threat to his financial stability, educational goals, and overall well-being. Following this, secondary appraisal involves assessing available resources and options to cope with the event. The friend might consider factors such as savings, emotional support, job prospects, and skills. His perception of his ability to manage and resolve the situation will influence his emotional response and coping strategies. If he views his resources as inadequate, stress levels may escalate, leading to feelings of helplessness or anxiety.

Main Point of Paragraph 3 – Stress Response: The stress response encompasses emotional, physiological, and behavioral reactions to the event and its appraisal. The friend may experience emotional responses such as anxiety, fear, and frustration. Physiologically, he might notice symptoms associated with stress, including increased heart rate or tension. Behaviorally, he may adopt maladaptive coping behaviors, such as withdrawal, excessive worrying, or seeking alternative employment opportunities. Alternatively, if he perceives sufficient resources and support, he might engage in proactive behaviors like updating his resume or seeking advice. The overall stress response will depend on the balance between perceived threat and available coping mechanisms.

Conclusion: Understanding how Lazarus and Folkman’s cognitive appraisal model explains reactions to job loss can help in developing adaptive strategies. Recognizing the importance of primary and secondary appraisal highlights the need to foster resilience and resourcefulness in stressful situations. By managing how one perceives and evaluates threats, individuals can reduce negative stress responses and better navigate financial and personal difficulties caused by unforeseen setbacks such as job loss. This framework emphasizes the importance of cognitive appraisal in determining emotional and behavioral outcomes during stressful life events.

References

• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
• Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745-774.
• Thoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? Journal of health and social behavior, 53-79.
• Hobfoll, S. E. (1988). The ecology of stress: Sources of resilience and vulnerability. American Psychologist, 43(4), 209-217.
• Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2011). Stress, coping, and resilience in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 34(6), 1015-1028.
• Lazarus, R. S., & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions and coping processes. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Perspectives in interactional psychology (pp. 287-327). Academic Press.
• Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679-704.
• Skalski, A., Hofmann, S. G., & Whelton, N. (2017). Stress and coping in the face of adversity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 49, 34-45.
• Compas, B. E., et al. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127.
• Patel, P., & Sharma, S. (2020). Resilience and adaptive coping in stressful events: A review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(3), 679-693.