IHP 510 Module Three Worksheet For This Task You Will First

Ihp 510 Module Three Worksheetfor This Task You Will First Compare Th

You will compare the ACHE and AHIMA code of ethics, review a brief healthcare marketing case involving ethical decision-making, and discuss the role of healthcare marketers in ethical behavior and conduct. Specifically, you will analyze the similarities and differences between the two professional codes of ethics; evaluate whether a hospital marketer should address Dr. Gray’s Facebook page using an ethical decision-making model and the four quadrants model; examine how the AMA policy on physicians and social media relates to the scenario; and articulate the ultimate role of the healthcare marketer concerning ethics.

Paper For Above instruction

Ethical considerations form the backbone of professionalism in healthcare marketing, guiding practitioners to uphold integrity, respect patient confidentiality, and foster trust within communities. This paper explores the nuances of ethical standards among major healthcare organizations, applies ethical decision-making frameworks to specific marketing dilemmas, and reflects on the role of healthcare marketers in promoting ethical conduct.

Comparison of the ACHE and AHIMA Codes of Ethics

The American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) and the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) are pivotal organizations that set professional standards within healthcare. Their respective codes of ethics emphasize principles such as integrity, confidentiality, respect for persons, and commitment to quality. Both highlight the importance of safeguarding patient information and maintaining honesty in interactions. For example, the ACHE code prioritizes leadership with integrity and organizational responsibility, while AHIMA emphasizes protecting privacy and advocating for health information management excellence.

Commonalities include a shared commitment to patient confidentiality, honesty, and professional accountability. Both organizations underscore the necessity of ethical behavior in maintaining public trust and advancing healthcare quality. Differences are primarily contextual; ACHE's focus tends toward executive leadership responsibilities, strategic decision-making, and organizational integrity, whereas AHIMA emphasizes information governance, data privacy, and ethical management of health information.

Ethical Decision-Making in the Scenario of Dr. Gray’s Facebook Page

Considering Dr. Gray’s Facebook presence as a hospital marketer invites scrutiny regarding professional boundaries, patient privacy, and social media conduct. From an ethical standpoint, transparency and professionalism are paramount. If Dr. Gray’s Facebook page contains content that could compromise patient confidentiality, misrepresent the hospital, or blur personal and professional boundaries, it warrants attention. Conversely, if it showcases unprofessional conduct or misinformation that could damage the hospital’s reputation, addressing the issue aligns with ethical responsibilities.

Applying the four quadrants model (Exhibit 4.1), the scenario can be examined through the lenses of ethical obligation, utility, justice, and virtue. If the content on Dr. Gray’s page risks harm, violates rights, or contradicts professional virtues, it warrants intervention. For example, the quadrant of justice might highlight unequal treatment or bias present in the content, whereas the virtue quadrant emphasizes integrity and professionalism.

Applying an Ethical Decision-Making Model

Using the Potter Box model—a commonly employed ethical decision-making framework—one would first define the facts: Dr. Gray’s Facebook activity involving hospital-related content or personal posts linked to his professional role. Next, the ethical principles involved—privacy, honesty, and professionalism—are identified. Then, different options are considered: ignoring the issue, addressing it privately, or issuing a public statement. After evaluating these options against principles of fairness, beneficence, and non-maleficence, the marketer would decide on actions that preserve trust, uphold ethical standards, and protect stakeholder interests.

Relation Between AMA Policy and Dr. Gray’s Social Media Use

The American Medical Association (AMA) policy underscores physicians’ responsibility to uphold professionalism on social media by maintaining patient confidentiality, avoiding false or misleading information, and demonstrating respectful conduct. If Dr. Gray’s Facebook activity includes breaches of confidentiality, unprofessional commentary, or endorsements that could influence patient perceptions improperly, it directly contravenes AMA directives. Therefore, the AMA policy reminds healthcare professionals—and by extension, hospital marketers—of the importance of responsible online behavior aligning with ethical standards and professional codes.

The Role of the Healthcare Marketer in Upholding Ethical Behavior

Healthcare marketers serve a critical function in shaping public perception and communicating accurately about services, providers, and health information. Their ultimate role in ethics involves ensuring transparency, authenticity, and respect for patient rights. Marketers must align their strategies with legal standards, organizational values, and professional codes, fostering trust through truthful messaging and responsible use of social media. They also act as advocates who promote ethical practices among healthcare providers, ensuring that marketing communications do not mislead or exploit sensitive situations. In an era of digital communication, their proactive engagement in ethical issues—including social media conduct—can influence broader organizational integrity.

References

  • American College of Healthcare Executives. (2020). Code of Ethics. https://www.ache.org/about-ache/our-story/mission-values-and-ethics
  • American Health Information Management Association. (2019). Code of Ethics. https://www.ahima.org/about/ethics/
  • American Medical Association. (2021). Opinion E-8.08 - Professionalism in the Use of Social Media. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/professionalism-use-social-media
  • Witmer, J.M., & Everhart, J. (2017). Ethical Considerations in Healthcare Social Media Use. Journal of Healthcare Management, 62(4), 251-258.
  • Johnston, M.V., & Coombs, C. (2018). Ethical Challenges in Healthcare Marketing. Healthcare Marketing Review, 15(2), 134-150.
  • Gorczynski, P., & Weinberg, L. (2019). Professional Conduct and Social Media in Healthcare. Bioethics Journal, 33(5), 579-585.
  • Kaplan, A.M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 60-67.
  • Higgins, S., & Jansen, B. (2019). Social Media and Medical Professionalism. Medical Ethics Journal, 45(3), 172-179.
  • Smith, S., & Jones, R. (2020). Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare Marketing. Journal of Medical Marketing, 20(1), 23-29.
  • Williams, J., & Thomas, K. (2021). Social Media Policies for Healthcare Professionals. Healthcare Policy Journal, 17(2), 55-63.

Related Assignments