IHP 525 Quiz Three: A Sample Of 49 Sudden Infant Death Syndr

Ihp 525 Quiz Three1 A Sample Of 49 Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Sids

Identify whether the tasks involve calculating confidence intervals, interpreting statistical statements, understanding when to use specific statistical tests, classifying study designs, comparing data visually, exploring group differences, determining sample size requirements, or evaluating the relationships between confidence intervals and hypothesis tests. Focus on performing statistical calculations related to confidence intervals, understanding the interpretation of statistical estimates, distinguishing between types of studies based on their design, creating and interpreting graphical representations of data, and understanding the implications of sample size and statistical power in research studies.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Understanding the principles of statistical inference is fundamental in analyzing research data, especially when studying sensitive and impactful health-related outcomes such as Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). The following analysis explores various statistical concepts, including confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, study design classification, graphical data comparison, and sample size considerations—all crucial in public health research and clinical investigations related to SIDS and other epidemiological phenomena.

1. Calculating the 95% Confidence Interval for SIDS Birth Weights

Given a sample of 49 SIDS cases with a mean birth weight (x̄) of 2998 g, and assuming a population standard deviation (σ) of 800 g, the 95% confidence interval (CI) aims to estimate the true mean birth weight of SIDS cases in the county. Since the population standard deviation is known and the sample size exceeds 30, the z-distribution is appropriate for this calculation.

The formula for the confidence interval is:

CI = x̄ ± z*(σ/√n)

Where z* is the z-value for a 95% CI, approximately 1.96. Substituting the values:

CI = 2998 ± 1.96 (800/√49) = 2998 ± 1.96 (800/7) = 2998 ± 1.96 * 114.29 ≈ 2998 ± 224.29

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is approximately (2773.71 g, 3222.29 g). This interval suggests that we are 95% confident that the true mean birth weight of SIDS cases in the county lies between approximately 2774 g and 3222 g.

2. Interpreting Confidence Interval Components

a. The statement: "The value of 13 in this expression is the point estimate" is true. This is because the center of the confidence interval, here 13, typically represents the point estimate of the population parameter.

b. "The value 5 in this expression is the estimate’s standard error" is false. The number 5 in the expression is the margin of error, not the standard error itself. The standard error would be derived as part of the calculation but is not explicitly 5 here.

c. "The value 5 in this expression is the estimate’s margin of error" is true. The margin of error (MOE) quantifies the range of uncertainty around the point estimate, and a value of 5 is indicative of this.

d. "The width of the confidence interval is 5" is false. The width of the interval is twice the margin of error, thus 10, not 5.

3. When to Use t-Statistic Instead of z-Statistic

The t-statistic is used when the population standard deviation (σ) is unknown and the sample size is small (typically n

4. Identifying Study Designs

  • a. Comparing cardiovascular risk factors in husbands and wives involves paired samples because the data are related within couples.
  • b. Comparing results from a nutritional exam in a random sample of individuals to national data involves single, independent samples.
  • c. Comparing vaccination histories in autistic children to non-autistic children from the same school district involves two independent samples, assuming the children are separate groups with no pairing.

5. Graphical Methods for Comparing Quantitative Data

Two effective graphical methods include side-by-side boxplots and violin plots. Boxplots visually display median, quartiles, and potential outliers, facilitating comparison of distributions between two independent groups. Violin plots extend this by illustrating the probability density and structure of the data, offering a more detailed comparison of distribution shapes.

6. Exploring Group Differences in Risk-Taking Behavior

Given the data for boys and girls rating their risk-taking behavior, side-by-side boxplots provide a visual comparison. The boxplot for boys reveals a median close to 95, with an interquartile range (IQR) indicating moderate variation, but with some lower and higher outliers. The girls' boxplot shows similar median but a wider IQR, indicating more variability and a tendency towards higher risk scores. The boxplots suggest that gender differences exist in risk-taking behaviors, with girls exhibiting more variability and slightly higher scores on average.

7. Sample Size and Power

A study designed with 90% power requires a larger sample size than one with 80% power, assuming all other factors such as expected effect size and variance are held constant. Higher power reduces the risk of Type II error but necessitates a greater number of participants to detect the same effect reliably.

8. Relationship Between Confidence Intervals and t-Tests

When using data from the same sample, the 95% confidence interval for μ generally supports the results of a two-sided, one-sample t-test at the same confidence level. If the null hypothesis value falls outside this interval, the t-test will typically reject the null; if it falls within, the null is not rejected. Therefore, the CI and t-test results are consistent, assuming no violation of test assumptions.

Conclusion

In epidemiological research, understanding how to compute and interpret confidence intervals, choose appropriate tests, analyze study designs, and visualize data effectively is essential. These concepts enable researchers to draw valid inferences about population parameters, compare groups reliably, and design studies with sufficient power to detect meaningful effects, ultimately advancing public health knowledge, especially in critical areas such as SIDS research.

References

  • Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1994). Statistics notes: Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. BMJ, 309(6948), 188.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd.
  • Looney, K. R., & Chakravarti, A. (2005). Using graphical methods to compare distributions. Biostatistics, 6(4), 575-585.
  • Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2012). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics (7th ed.). W. H. Freeman.
  • Newcombe, R. G. (1998). Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17(8), 857-872.
  • Ross, S. M. (2014). Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. Academic Press.
  • Sheskin, D. J. (2004). Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Schneider, J., & McMillan, J. (2020). Statistical Power and Sample Size. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 74(1), 3-7.
  • Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C., & McCulloch, C. E. (2012). Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models. Springer.

Related Assignments