Imagine A Well-Known Researcher At A Major University

Question

Imagine a well-known researcher at a major university has two graduate Imagine a well-known researcher at a major university has two graduate student assistants. He conducts three studies in his laboratory, all of which involve labor-intensive procedures. The graduate research assistants help with data collection. They also help write the discussion section of the final article, adding their thoughts and suggestions to the various drafts. The article is accepted into a leading journal for publication. The primary researcher lists only himself as the author of the article, claiming that he wrote at least 75% of the final paper. Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: Has the primary researcher committed an error? Why or why not? Explain your answer. If you were one of the graduate assistants, how would you handle this scenario? Reference the appropriate section of American Counseling Association Code of Ethics to justify your responses. How does adhering to research ethics support professionalism in the counseling field? Provide an example. How does adhering to research integrity support professionalism in the counseling field? Provide an example.

Dr. Jack HW Helper · Accepted Answer

The scenario presented raises significant ethical questions regarding authorship attribution and the responsibilities outlined by the American Counseling Association (ACA) Code of Ethics. According to the ACA’s standards, it is essential for researchers and practitioners to acknowledge all individuals who have contributed substantially to a work (ACA, 2014). Specifically, Standard A.4.b. emphasizes the importance of giving credit to those who have contributed to research or scholarly publications. By listing only himself as the author, despite the graduate assistants’ significant roles in data collection and manuscript drafting, the primary researcher committed an ethical oversight, potentially amounting to misrepresentation of contribution—a violation of ethical research norms. Research and scholarly integrity are foundational to maintaining professionalism in the counseling field. Adherence to ethical standards fosters trust among clients, colleagues, and the wider community. For example, in a counseling research project examining the efficacy of a new intervention, accurately acknowledging all contributors ensures transparency and respect for collaborative efforts. This transparency enhances credibility and ensures that all parties receive appropriate recognition, reinforcing a professional environment rooted in honesty and integrity. Furthermore, research integrity involves honest reporting and attribution of work, which is critical to uphold the credibility of the field. When a researcher properly attributes authorship, it communicates respect for others’ contributions and maintains the accuracy of the scholarly record (American Psychological Association [APA], 2022). For instance, if a graduate student helps with designing the methodology or analyzing data, their recognition as a co-author ensures their effort is ethically acknowledged. Such transparency upholds the professional standards necessary for the evolution of evidence-based practices in counseling. I

Imagine A Well-Known Researcher At A Major University

Imagine a well-known researcher at a major university has two graduate

Paper For Above instruction

References

Imagine a well-known researcher at a major university has two graduate

Paper For Above instruction

References

Related Assignments